Investigation of long-term degradation of the interface in the anchorage zone of GFRP-RC beams

IF 6.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Weiwei Wu , Xiongjun He , Wenrui Yang , Zhiyi Tang , Huayi Wang , Ming Zhou , Bingyan Wei , Jia He
{"title":"Investigation of long-term degradation of the interface in the anchorage zone of GFRP-RC beams","authors":"Weiwei Wu ,&nbsp;Xiongjun He ,&nbsp;Wenrui Yang ,&nbsp;Zhiyi Tang ,&nbsp;Huayi Wang ,&nbsp;Ming Zhou ,&nbsp;Bingyan Wei ,&nbsp;Jia He","doi":"10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the long-term service process of Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer – Reinforced Concrete (GFRP-RC) structures, degradation of GFRP bars and concrete materials can occur, leading to a partial loss of the internal bonding performance of the structure. In this paper, a long-term study on the interface performance of GFRP-RC beams was conducted over an 8-year period to investigate the long-term degradation characteristics of the interface materials and the long-term Effective Anchorage Length (EAL) of GFRP bars. Firstly, a comprehensive analysis from a review perspective was conducted on the long-term degradation mechanisms of concrete and GFRP bars that considers the chemical behavior between microscopic molecules, the two-dimensional (2D) structure observed through micro electron microscopy, and the three-dimensional (3D) structure revealed by micro-X-ray imaging. Secondly, a new EAL calculation model is derived, and the long-term variation parameters of EAL under different conditions are determined. It was observed that the influence of alkaline corrosion and sustained loading is relatively small compared to the influence of initial structural defects on EAL. Finally, a comparison with four international standards revealed that the anchorage length design provided by JSCE-97 and ACI 440–1R-15 is overly conservative for GFRP bars, with values approximately 2–3 times the test results. On the other hand, CSA-S806–12 and CSA S6–19 standards are relatively close to the test values. Considering both design rationality and long-term corrosion resistance, it is concluded that the CSA-S806–12 specification is more reasonable.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9641,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies in Construction Materials","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article e03399"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214509524005503/pdfft?md5=cbf68785f8189b318073cfe6f8ad4b3a&pid=1-s2.0-S2214509524005503-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies in Construction Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214509524005503","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the long-term service process of Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer – Reinforced Concrete (GFRP-RC) structures, degradation of GFRP bars and concrete materials can occur, leading to a partial loss of the internal bonding performance of the structure. In this paper, a long-term study on the interface performance of GFRP-RC beams was conducted over an 8-year period to investigate the long-term degradation characteristics of the interface materials and the long-term Effective Anchorage Length (EAL) of GFRP bars. Firstly, a comprehensive analysis from a review perspective was conducted on the long-term degradation mechanisms of concrete and GFRP bars that considers the chemical behavior between microscopic molecules, the two-dimensional (2D) structure observed through micro electron microscopy, and the three-dimensional (3D) structure revealed by micro-X-ray imaging. Secondly, a new EAL calculation model is derived, and the long-term variation parameters of EAL under different conditions are determined. It was observed that the influence of alkaline corrosion and sustained loading is relatively small compared to the influence of initial structural defects on EAL. Finally, a comparison with four international standards revealed that the anchorage length design provided by JSCE-97 and ACI 440–1R-15 is overly conservative for GFRP bars, with values approximately 2–3 times the test results. On the other hand, CSA-S806–12 and CSA S6–19 standards are relatively close to the test values. Considering both design rationality and long-term corrosion resistance, it is concluded that the CSA-S806–12 specification is more reasonable.

对 GFRP-RC 梁锚固区界面长期退化的研究
在玻璃纤维增强聚合物-钢筋混凝土(GFRP-RC)结构的长期使用过程中,GFRP 杆件和混凝土材料会发生降解,导致结构内部粘结性能部分丧失。本文对 GFRP-RC 梁的界面性能进行了长达 8 年的长期研究,以探讨界面材料的长期降解特性和 GFRP 钢筋的长期有效锚固长度(EAL)。首先,从回顾的角度对混凝土和 GFRP 钢筋的长期降解机理进行了全面分析,考虑了微观分子间的化学行为、微电子显微镜观察到的二维(2D)结构以及微 X 射线成像揭示的三维(3D)结构。其次,推导出一种新的 EAL 计算模型,并确定了不同条件下 EAL 的长期变化参数。结果表明,与初始结构缺陷对 EAL 的影响相比,碱性腐蚀和持续加载的影响相对较小。最后,通过与四项国际标准的比较发现,JSCE-97 和 ACI 440-1R-15 提供的锚固长度设计对于 GFRP 钢筋来说过于保守,其值约为测试结果的 2-3 倍。另一方面,CSA-S806-12 和 CSA S6-19 标准则相对接近测试值。从设计合理性和长期耐腐蚀性两方面考虑,CSA-S806-12 标准更为合理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
842
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Case Studies in Construction Materials provides a forum for the rapid publication of short, structured Case Studies on construction materials. In addition, the journal also publishes related Short Communications, Full length research article and Comprehensive review papers (by invitation). The journal will provide an essential compendium of case studies for practicing engineers, designers, researchers and other practitioners who are interested in all aspects construction materials. The journal will publish new and novel case studies, but will also provide a forum for the publication of high quality descriptions of classic construction material problems and solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信