Adolescents’ Intention to Use Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Postpartum

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
{"title":"Adolescents’ Intention to Use Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Postpartum","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jpag.2024.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study Objective</h3><p>Multiparous teens, compared to primiparous teens, are at increased risk for adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes. Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is infrequently used among postpartum teens. This study identifies predictors of teens’ intentions to use LARC postpartum when it is widely available.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Colorado teens who were patients during their pregnancy in an adolescent-centered clinic where all common methods of contraception were easily accessible were surveyed in clinic during their third trimester and following delivery regarding life circumstances (relationships, stress, and family function) and intended method of postpartum contraception. Multinomial logistic regression analyses were used to examine predictors of intended postpartum contraceptive method: LARC, non-LARC effective (condoms, birth control pills, shot, patch, or ring), or low-effective method or no contraception (abstinence, no method, or undecided).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 1203 patients were enrolled. Greater life stress was associated with greater likelihood of intending to use low-effective contraception versus LARC postpartum. Teens in a longer relationship with their baby's father (versus those never in a relationship with the baby's father) were less likely to intend to use low-effective contraception or non-LARC effective methods and more likely to intend to use LARC postpartum.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>When structural barriers are minimized, non-clinical factors such as relationship context and life stress are most associated with postpartum LARC use intentions. Health care providers can help teen patients obtain the postpartum contraception the patients believe is best by employing developmentally appropriate, person-centered care that is sensitive to life stressors and relationship context.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16708,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology","volume":"37 5","pages":"Pages 510-515"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1083318824002316","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study Objective

Multiparous teens, compared to primiparous teens, are at increased risk for adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes. Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is infrequently used among postpartum teens. This study identifies predictors of teens’ intentions to use LARC postpartum when it is widely available.

Methods

Colorado teens who were patients during their pregnancy in an adolescent-centered clinic where all common methods of contraception were easily accessible were surveyed in clinic during their third trimester and following delivery regarding life circumstances (relationships, stress, and family function) and intended method of postpartum contraception. Multinomial logistic regression analyses were used to examine predictors of intended postpartum contraceptive method: LARC, non-LARC effective (condoms, birth control pills, shot, patch, or ring), or low-effective method or no contraception (abstinence, no method, or undecided).

Results

A total of 1203 patients were enrolled. Greater life stress was associated with greater likelihood of intending to use low-effective contraception versus LARC postpartum. Teens in a longer relationship with their baby's father (versus those never in a relationship with the baby's father) were less likely to intend to use low-effective contraception or non-LARC effective methods and more likely to intend to use LARC postpartum.

Conclusion

When structural barriers are minimized, non-clinical factors such as relationship context and life stress are most associated with postpartum LARC use intentions. Health care providers can help teen patients obtain the postpartum contraception the patients believe is best by employing developmentally appropriate, person-centered care that is sensitive to life stressors and relationship context.

青少年产后使用长效可逆避孕药具的意向。
研究目的与初产少女相比,多产少女患新生儿和产妇不良后果的风险更高。产后青少年很少使用长效可逆避孕药(LARC)。本研究确定了在 LARC 广泛使用的情况下青少年产后使用 LARC 的意向预测因素:方法:科罗拉多州的青少年在怀孕期间曾在一家以青少年为中心的诊所就诊,该诊所提供所有常见的避孕方法,这些青少年在怀孕三个月期间和分娩后在诊所接受了关于生活环境(人际关系、压力和家庭功能)和产后避孕方法的调查。采用多项式逻辑回归分析来研究产后避孕方法的预测因素:LARC、非 LARC 有效方法(避孕套、避孕药、避孕针、避孕贴或避孕环)、低效方法或无避孕方法(禁欲、无方法或未决定):共招募了 1 203 名患者。生活压力越大,产后打算使用低效避孕药具或 LARC 的可能性就越大。与孩子父亲保持较长时间关系的青少年(与从未与孩子父亲保持关系的青少年相比)打算使用低效避孕药具或非 LARC 有效方法的可能性较小,而打算在产后使用 LARC 的可能性较大:结论:当结构性障碍最小化时,关系背景和生活压力等非临床因素与产后使用 LARC 的意愿关系最大。医疗服务提供者可以帮助青少年患者获得他们认为最好的产后避孕方法,方法是采用适合其发展的、以人为本的医疗服务,并对生活压力和关系背景保持敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
251
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology includes all aspects of clinical and basic science research in pediatric and adolescent gynecology. The Journal draws on expertise from a variety of disciplines including pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, reproduction and gynecology, reproductive and pediatric endocrinology, genetics, and molecular biology. The Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology features original studies, review articles, book and literature reviews, letters to the editor, and communications in brief. It is an essential resource for the libraries of OB/GYN specialists, as well as pediatricians and primary care physicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信