Self-reported awareness of genetic testing, the impact of family history, and access to clinical trials for people diagnosed with ovarian cancer in Australia
{"title":"Self-reported awareness of genetic testing, the impact of family history, and access to clinical trials for people diagnosed with ovarian cancer in Australia","authors":"Deborah Roczo , Vanessa Alford , Alison Trainer , Anna DeFazio , Amy Pearn , Caitlin Delaney , Megan Cotter , Sue Hegarty","doi":"10.1016/j.gore.2024.101427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess the understanding of people diagnosed with ovarian cancer regarding genetic testing; to understand knowledge gaps among people diagnosed with ovarian cancer that may impact best practice care; and to monitor overall changes in understanding from 2015 to 2022.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Longitudinal ’opt-in’ study using an online survey tool at three timepoints: 2015, 2018 and 2022.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>People in Australia (or their families / caregivers) diagnosed with ovarian cancer between 2010 and 2022).</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>Self-reported awareness of heritable risk factors for ovarian cancer, genetic testing approaches and participation in clinical trials.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study indicated that there have been improvements in the understanding and awareness of people diagnosed with ovarian cancer regarding familial risk (an increase from 43.6% (45 of 149) in 2015 to 62.9% (166 of 264) in 2022); but people were less likely to be aware of the difference between somatic (tumour) and germline testing (120 of 266, 45.1%). However, there were self-reported improvements to clinical trial access in non-metropolitan areas (12 of 64, 18.8% in 2022 compared to 22 of 145, 15.2% in 2018), bringing it on par with metropolitan areas (32 of 169, 18.9% in 2022).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite improved awareness about genetic testing among people diagnosed with ovarian cancer, there remain knowledge gaps in understanding of genetic testing types (germline and somatic) and gene variant targeted therapies; and further work to improve clinical trial awareness and access is required.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12873,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578924001061/pdfft?md5=1cb37abdd636a40d68103691ea733050&pid=1-s2.0-S2352578924001061-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic Oncology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352578924001061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
To assess the understanding of people diagnosed with ovarian cancer regarding genetic testing; to understand knowledge gaps among people diagnosed with ovarian cancer that may impact best practice care; and to monitor overall changes in understanding from 2015 to 2022.
Design
Longitudinal ’opt-in’ study using an online survey tool at three timepoints: 2015, 2018 and 2022.
Participants
People in Australia (or their families / caregivers) diagnosed with ovarian cancer between 2010 and 2022).
Main outcome measures
Self-reported awareness of heritable risk factors for ovarian cancer, genetic testing approaches and participation in clinical trials.
Results
The study indicated that there have been improvements in the understanding and awareness of people diagnosed with ovarian cancer regarding familial risk (an increase from 43.6% (45 of 149) in 2015 to 62.9% (166 of 264) in 2022); but people were less likely to be aware of the difference between somatic (tumour) and germline testing (120 of 266, 45.1%). However, there were self-reported improvements to clinical trial access in non-metropolitan areas (12 of 64, 18.8% in 2022 compared to 22 of 145, 15.2% in 2018), bringing it on par with metropolitan areas (32 of 169, 18.9% in 2022).
Conclusions
Despite improved awareness about genetic testing among people diagnosed with ovarian cancer, there remain knowledge gaps in understanding of genetic testing types (germline and somatic) and gene variant targeted therapies; and further work to improve clinical trial awareness and access is required.
期刊介绍:
Gynecologic Oncology Reports is an online-only, open access journal devoted to the rapid publication of narrative review articles, survey articles, case reports, case series, letters to the editor regarding previously published manuscripts and other short communications in the field of gynecologic oncology. The journal will consider papers that concern tumors of the female reproductive tract, with originality, quality, and clarity the chief criteria of acceptance.