Causal Relationships of Ligamentous Injuries in the Knee on Corticospinal Tract Structure: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Le Yu, Weichu Tao, Zhengbiao Jin, Yi Li, Xiao'ao Xue, Ru Wang, Yinghui Hua
{"title":"Causal Relationships of Ligamentous Injuries in the Knee on Corticospinal Tract Structure: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis.","authors":"Le Yu, Weichu Tao, Zhengbiao Jin, Yi Li, Xiao'ao Xue, Ru Wang, Yinghui Hua","doi":"10.1177/19417381241255342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The association between ligamentous knee injuries and corticospinal tract (CST) structure has attracted attention; however, any causal relationship remains uncertain. We performed Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to identify the causal effects of ligamentous knee injuries on the CST.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>Ligamentous knee injuries impair CST microstructure (ie, by reducing fractional anisotropy [FA] and increasing mean diffusivity [MD]).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>MR analysis.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 2.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MR uses genetic variants as instrumental variables to infer causal relationships between exposures and outcomes. Summary data for ligamentous injuries in knee and CST structure were obtained from genome-wide association study datasets. Significant and independent (5 × 10<sup>-6</sup>; <i>r</i><sup>2</sup> < 0.001; 10,000 kb) single-nucleotide polymorphisms were extracted for MR analysis. Three methods for MR analysis were used (hypothesis-driven 1-tailed inverse variance weighted, MR-Egger, and weighted median), and sensitivity analyses were conducted to test reliability and stability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results from 3 MR methods consistently demonstrated that ligamentous knee injuries increased MD of the right CST (β, 0.063; 90% CI, 0.003-0.123; <i>P</i> = 0.04), and weak statistical significance suggested increased MD of the left CST (β, 0.060; 90% CI, -0.002 to -0.121; <i>P</i> = 0.05). However, no significant causal relationships were observed in CST FA, and no significant pleiotropy or heterogeneity was observed. Sensitivity analysis utilizing 2-tailed tests had no significant associations between ligamentous knee injuries and changes in CST structure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is statistically weak genetic evidence that corticospinal pathway abnormalities may evolve after ligamentous knee injuries, which manifests as abnormally organized neurites.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Ligamentous knee injuries require attention not only to damage to the structure of the knee joint itself but also to the process of maladaptive neuroplasticity that leads to structural and functional changes of the CST; novel interventions that target the corticospinal pathway may provide subsequent treatment of ligamentous knee injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":54276,"journal":{"name":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19417381241255342","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The association between ligamentous knee injuries and corticospinal tract (CST) structure has attracted attention; however, any causal relationship remains uncertain. We performed Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to identify the causal effects of ligamentous knee injuries on the CST.

Hypothesis: Ligamentous knee injuries impair CST microstructure (ie, by reducing fractional anisotropy [FA] and increasing mean diffusivity [MD]).

Study design: MR analysis.

Level of evidence: Level 2.

Methods: MR uses genetic variants as instrumental variables to infer causal relationships between exposures and outcomes. Summary data for ligamentous injuries in knee and CST structure were obtained from genome-wide association study datasets. Significant and independent (5 × 10-6; r2 < 0.001; 10,000 kb) single-nucleotide polymorphisms were extracted for MR analysis. Three methods for MR analysis were used (hypothesis-driven 1-tailed inverse variance weighted, MR-Egger, and weighted median), and sensitivity analyses were conducted to test reliability and stability.

Results: Results from 3 MR methods consistently demonstrated that ligamentous knee injuries increased MD of the right CST (β, 0.063; 90% CI, 0.003-0.123; P = 0.04), and weak statistical significance suggested increased MD of the left CST (β, 0.060; 90% CI, -0.002 to -0.121; P = 0.05). However, no significant causal relationships were observed in CST FA, and no significant pleiotropy or heterogeneity was observed. Sensitivity analysis utilizing 2-tailed tests had no significant associations between ligamentous knee injuries and changes in CST structure.

Conclusion: There is statistically weak genetic evidence that corticospinal pathway abnormalities may evolve after ligamentous knee injuries, which manifests as abnormally organized neurites.

Clinical relevance: Ligamentous knee injuries require attention not only to damage to the structure of the knee joint itself but also to the process of maladaptive neuroplasticity that leads to structural and functional changes of the CST; novel interventions that target the corticospinal pathway may provide subsequent treatment of ligamentous knee injuries.

膝关节韧带损伤与皮质脊髓束结构的因果关系:孟德尔随机分析法
背景:膝关节韧带损伤与皮质脊髓束(CST)结构之间的关系引起了人们的关注;然而,其中是否存在因果关系仍不确定。我们进行了孟德尔随机化(MR)分析,以确定膝关节韧带损伤对 CST 的因果关系:假设:膝关节韧带损伤会损害CST的微观结构(即通过降低分数各向异性[FA]和增加平均扩散率[MD]):研究设计:磁共振分析:研究方法:MR 分析:MR利用基因变异作为工具变量来推断暴露与结果之间的因果关系。膝关节韧带损伤和 CST 结构的汇总数据来自全基因组关联研究数据集。提取重要且独立(5 × 10-6; r2 < 0.001; 10,000 kb)的单核苷酸多态性进行磁共振分析。使用了三种 MR 分析方法(假设驱动的 1-tailed 逆方差加权法、MR-Egger 法和加权中位法),并进行了敏感性分析以测试可靠性和稳定性:3种MR方法的结果一致表明,膝关节韧带损伤会增加右侧CST的MD(β,0.063;90% CI,0.003-0.123;P = 0.04),弱统计学意义表明左侧CST的MD会增加(β,0.060;90% CI,-0.002至-0.121;P = 0.05)。然而,在 CST FA 中没有观察到明显的因果关系,也没有观察到明显的多义性或异质性。利用双尾检验进行的敏感性分析表明,膝关节韧带损伤与 CST 结构变化之间没有明显关联:结论:统计学上有微弱的遗传证据表明,膝关节韧带损伤后可能会出现皮质脊髓通路异常,表现为异常组织的神经元:临床意义:膝关节韧带损伤不仅需要关注膝关节本身结构的损伤,还需要关注导致 CST 结构和功能变化的适应性神经可塑性过程;针对皮质脊髓通路的新型干预措施可能会对膝关节韧带损伤起到后续治疗作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach
Sports Health-A Multidisciplinary Approach Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach is an indispensable resource for all medical professionals involved in the training and care of the competitive or recreational athlete, including primary care physicians, orthopaedic surgeons, physical therapists, athletic trainers and other medical and health care professionals. Published bimonthly, Sports Health is a collaborative publication from the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine (AMSSM), the National Athletic Trainers’ Association (NATA), and the Sports Physical Therapy Section (SPTS). The journal publishes review articles, original research articles, case studies, images, short updates, legal briefs, editorials, and letters to the editor. Topics include: -Sports Injury and Treatment -Care of the Athlete -Athlete Rehabilitation -Medical Issues in the Athlete -Surgical Techniques in Sports Medicine -Case Studies in Sports Medicine -Images in Sports Medicine -Legal Issues -Pediatric Athletes -General Sports Trauma -Sports Psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信