Selection of Convolutional Neural Network Model for Bladder Tumor Classification of Cystoscopy Images and Comparison with Humans.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Ju Young Lee, Yong Seong Lee, Jong Hyun Tae, In Ho Chang, Tae-Hyoung Kim, Soon Chul Myung, Tuan Thanh Nguyen, Jae Hyeok Lee, Joongwon Choi, Jung Hoon Kim, Jin Wook Kim, Se Young Choi
{"title":"Selection of Convolutional Neural Network Model for Bladder Tumor Classification of Cystoscopy Images and Comparison with Humans.","authors":"Ju Young Lee, Yong Seong Lee, Jong Hyun Tae, In Ho Chang, Tae-Hyoung Kim, Soon Chul Myung, Tuan Thanh Nguyen, Jae Hyeok Lee, Joongwon Choi, Jung Hoon Kim, Jin Wook Kim, Se Young Choi","doi":"10.1089/end.2024.0250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> An investigation of various convolutional neural network (CNN)-based deep learning algorithms was conducted to select the appropriate artificial intelligence (AI) model for calculating the diagnostic performance of bladder tumor classification on cystoscopy images, with the performance of the selected model to be compared against that of medical students and urologists. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A total of 3,731 cystoscopic images that contained 2,191 tumor images were obtained from 543 bladder tumor cases and 219 normal cases were evaluated. A total of 17 CNN models were trained for tumor classification with various hyperparameters. The diagnostic performance of the selected AI model was compared with the results obtained from urologists and medical students by using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve graph and metrics. <b><i>Results:</i></b> EfficientNetB0 was selected as the appropriate AI model. In the test results, EfficientNetB0 achieved a balanced accuracy of 81%, sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 74%, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 92%. In contrast, human-derived diagnostic statistics for the test data showed an average balanced accuracy of 75%, sensitivity of 94%, and specificity of 55%. Specifically, urologists had an average balanced accuracy of 91%, sensitivity of 95%, and specificity of 88%, while medical students had an average balanced accuracy of 69%, sensitivity of 94%, and specificity of 44%. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Among the various AI models, we suggest that EfficientNetB0 is an appropriate AI classification model for determining the presence of bladder tumors in cystoscopic images. EfficientNetB0 showed the highest performance among several models and showed high accuracy and specificity compared to medical students. This AI technology will be helpful for less experienced urologists or nonurologists in making diagnoses. Image-based deep learning classifies bladder cancer using cystoscopy images and shows promise for generalized applications in biomedical image analysis and clinical decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0250","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: An investigation of various convolutional neural network (CNN)-based deep learning algorithms was conducted to select the appropriate artificial intelligence (AI) model for calculating the diagnostic performance of bladder tumor classification on cystoscopy images, with the performance of the selected model to be compared against that of medical students and urologists. Methods: A total of 3,731 cystoscopic images that contained 2,191 tumor images were obtained from 543 bladder tumor cases and 219 normal cases were evaluated. A total of 17 CNN models were trained for tumor classification with various hyperparameters. The diagnostic performance of the selected AI model was compared with the results obtained from urologists and medical students by using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve graph and metrics. Results: EfficientNetB0 was selected as the appropriate AI model. In the test results, EfficientNetB0 achieved a balanced accuracy of 81%, sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 74%, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 92%. In contrast, human-derived diagnostic statistics for the test data showed an average balanced accuracy of 75%, sensitivity of 94%, and specificity of 55%. Specifically, urologists had an average balanced accuracy of 91%, sensitivity of 95%, and specificity of 88%, while medical students had an average balanced accuracy of 69%, sensitivity of 94%, and specificity of 44%. Conclusions: Among the various AI models, we suggest that EfficientNetB0 is an appropriate AI classification model for determining the presence of bladder tumors in cystoscopic images. EfficientNetB0 showed the highest performance among several models and showed high accuracy and specificity compared to medical students. This AI technology will be helpful for less experienced urologists or nonurologists in making diagnoses. Image-based deep learning classifies bladder cancer using cystoscopy images and shows promise for generalized applications in biomedical image analysis and clinical decision making.

选择用于膀胱镜图像膀胱肿瘤分类的卷积神经网络模型并与人类进行比较。
目的:对各种基于卷积神经网络(CNN)的深度学习算法进行研究,以选择合适的人工智能(AI)模型来计算膀胱镜图像上膀胱肿瘤分类的诊断性能,并将所选模型的性能与医学生和泌尿科医生的性能进行比较:方法:评估了从 543 个膀胱肿瘤病例和 219 个正常病例中获得的共 3731 张膀胱镜图像,其中包含 2191 张肿瘤图像。共训练了 17 个 CNN 模型,使用不同的超参数进行肿瘤分类。通过使用接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)图和指标,将所选人工智能模型的诊断性能与泌尿科医生和医学生的诊断结果进行了比较:结果:EfficientNetB0 被选为合适的人工智能模型。在测试结果中,EfficientNetB0 的平衡准确率为 81%,灵敏度为 88%,特异性为 74%,AUC 为 92%。相比之下,测试数据的人类诊断统计数据显示,平均平衡准确率为 75%,灵敏度为 94%,特异性为 55%。具体来说,泌尿科医生的平均平衡准确率为 91%,灵敏度为 95%,特异性为 88%,而医科学生的平均平衡准确率为 69%,灵敏度为 94%,特异性为 44% 结论:在各种人工智能模型中,我们认为 EfficientNetB0 是用于判断膀胱镜图像中是否存在膀胱肿瘤的合适人工智能分类模型。在多个模型中,EfficientNetB0 的性能最高,与医学生相比,其准确性和特异性都很高。这项人工智能技术将有助于经验不足的泌尿科医生或非泌尿科医生做出诊断。基于图像的深度学习可利用膀胱镜图像对膀胱癌进行分类,并有望在生物医学图像分析和临床决策中得到广泛应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信