Size matters: Total testicular volume predicts sperm count in Tanner V varicocele patients

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
{"title":"Size matters: Total testicular volume predicts sperm count in Tanner V varicocele patients","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.05.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div><span>It is known the prevalence of varicoceles in adolescent men is 14–29% but there is debate surrounding implications on fertility. As obtaining a </span>semen analysis (SA) may be challenging, there is need for objective tests as measures of fecundity. Our aim was to investigate the relationship between testicular volume differential (TVD), varicocele grade, and total testicular volume (TTV) on seminal parameters including total motile sperm count (TMSC).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective single-center chart review over 14 years of 486 Tanner V adolescent males. Three hundred and four met inclusion of palpable, non-operated left-sided varicocele who underwent at least one SA and ultrasound. Abnormal TMSC was defined by World Health Organization 2010 criteria for minimal reference ranges. Multivariate logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic analysis with Youden J-statistic and descriptive statistics were performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Three hundred and four Tanner V adolescents with median age of 18.0 years (18.0–19.0), median TTV of 34.5 cc (28.9, 40.2) and median TMSC of 62.5 million/ejaculate (25.4, 123.4) were evaluated. TTV cutoff of 29.5 cc was found to predict TMSC of &lt;9 million/ejaculate with negative predictive value of 96.2% and odds ratio of 6.08 ([2.13–17.42], p &lt; 0.001). TVD greater than 20% did not reach statistical significance with an odds ratio of 1.66 ([0.41–6.62], p = 0.50).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>In clinical practice, each patient will need to have an individualized plan. Based on our data, for older adolescents (17 or 18 years) with varicocele and an abnormal TTV, clinicians may have a lower threshold for advising SA, and if unable to obtain, surgical intervention and/or closer surveillance should be stressed. Patients should be informed of their six-fold increase in abnormal SA. Patients with normal TTV should be advised they are at lower risk of having abnormal SA. Younger patients with varicocele and an initial TVD&gt;20%, should be followed closely but intervention delayed until 17 or 18 to better assess TTV. The importance of trending patient data should be emphasized as a single measurement has low predictive value for developing adolescents. Limitations of our study include a retrospective design and the lack of uniform correlation between adolescent SA and paternity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div><span>Total testicular volume less than 29.5 cc increased odds of abnormal semen analysis by over six times and had a negative predictive value of 96.2%. Ultrasound results may be useful for risk stratification and counselling on appropriateness of surgical intervention.</span><span><figure><span><img><ol><li><span><span>Download: <span>Download high-res image (159KB)</span></span></span></li><li><span><span>Download: <span>Download full-size image</span></span></span></li></ol></span><span><span><p><span>Summary Figure</span>. <!-->A: ROC curve of TTV as a predictor of abnormal TMSC (defined as &lt;9 million/ejaculate) – all patients. AUC 0.712 [0.611–0.814], sensitivity of 76.1%, specificity of 60.7%, NPV of 96.2%, PPV of 16.2% and Youden J-statistic determined ideal cutoff of 29.5 cc as predictor of abnormal TMSC. B: ROC curve of TTV as a predictor of abnormal TMSC (defined as &lt;9 million/ejaculate) – left testicular hypotrophy subgroup. AUC 0.801 [0.697–0.906], sensitivity of 78.3%, specificity of 76.9%, NPV of 98.2%, PPV of 25.6% and Youden J-statistic determined ideal cutoff of 29.1 cc as predictor of abnormal TMSC.</p></span></span></figure></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":16747,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1477513124002705","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

It is known the prevalence of varicoceles in adolescent men is 14–29% but there is debate surrounding implications on fertility. As obtaining a semen analysis (SA) may be challenging, there is need for objective tests as measures of fecundity. Our aim was to investigate the relationship between testicular volume differential (TVD), varicocele grade, and total testicular volume (TTV) on seminal parameters including total motile sperm count (TMSC).

Materials and methods

We conducted a retrospective single-center chart review over 14 years of 486 Tanner V adolescent males. Three hundred and four met inclusion of palpable, non-operated left-sided varicocele who underwent at least one SA and ultrasound. Abnormal TMSC was defined by World Health Organization 2010 criteria for minimal reference ranges. Multivariate logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic analysis with Youden J-statistic and descriptive statistics were performed.

Results

Three hundred and four Tanner V adolescents with median age of 18.0 years (18.0–19.0), median TTV of 34.5 cc (28.9, 40.2) and median TMSC of 62.5 million/ejaculate (25.4, 123.4) were evaluated. TTV cutoff of 29.5 cc was found to predict TMSC of <9 million/ejaculate with negative predictive value of 96.2% and odds ratio of 6.08 ([2.13–17.42], p < 0.001). TVD greater than 20% did not reach statistical significance with an odds ratio of 1.66 ([0.41–6.62], p = 0.50).

Discussion

In clinical practice, each patient will need to have an individualized plan. Based on our data, for older adolescents (17 or 18 years) with varicocele and an abnormal TTV, clinicians may have a lower threshold for advising SA, and if unable to obtain, surgical intervention and/or closer surveillance should be stressed. Patients should be informed of their six-fold increase in abnormal SA. Patients with normal TTV should be advised they are at lower risk of having abnormal SA. Younger patients with varicocele and an initial TVD>20%, should be followed closely but intervention delayed until 17 or 18 to better assess TTV. The importance of trending patient data should be emphasized as a single measurement has low predictive value for developing adolescents. Limitations of our study include a retrospective design and the lack of uniform correlation between adolescent SA and paternity.

Conclusions

Total testicular volume less than 29.5 cc increased odds of abnormal semen analysis by over six times and had a negative predictive value of 96.2%. Ultrasound results may be useful for risk stratification and counselling on appropriateness of surgical intervention.
  1. Download: Download high-res image (159KB)
  2. Download: Download full-size image

Summary Figure. A: ROC curve of TTV as a predictor of abnormal TMSC (defined as <9 million/ejaculate) – all patients. AUC 0.712 [0.611–0.814], sensitivity of 76.1%, specificity of 60.7%, NPV of 96.2%, PPV of 16.2% and Youden J-statistic determined ideal cutoff of 29.5 cc as predictor of abnormal TMSC. B: ROC curve of TTV as a predictor of abnormal TMSC (defined as <9 million/ejaculate) – left testicular hypotrophy subgroup. AUC 0.801 [0.697–0.906], sensitivity of 78.3%, specificity of 76.9%, NPV of 98.2%, PPV of 25.6% and Youden J-statistic determined ideal cutoff of 29.1 cc as predictor of abnormal TMSC.

大小很重要:睾丸总体积可预测坦纳五型精索静脉曲张患者的精子数量。
导言:众所周知,精索静脉曲张在青少年男性中的发病率为 14%-29%,但围绕其对生育能力的影响还存在争议。由于获得精液分析(SA)可能具有挑战性,因此需要客观的测试来衡量生育能力。我们的目的是研究睾丸体积差(TVD)、精索静脉曲张等级和睾丸总体积(TTV)与精液参数(包括总活动精子数(TMSC))之间的关系:我们对 486 名坦纳 V 型青少年男性进行了 14 年的回顾性单中心病历审查。其中有 34 名符合可触及、未手术的左侧精索静脉曲张患者,他们至少接受了一次 SA 和超声检查。TMSC异常是根据世界卫生组织2010年最小参考范围标准定义的。研究人员进行了多变量逻辑回归、Youden J统计的接收者操作特征分析和描述性统计:共评估了 34 名坦纳 V 型青少年,他们的中位年龄为 18.0 岁(18.0-19.0),中位 TTV 为 34.5 cc(28.9-40.2),中位 TMSC 为 6250 万/射精(25.4-123.4)。结果发现,29.5 毫升的 TTV 临界值可预测讨论的 TMSC:在临床实践中,每位患者都需要制定个性化的计划。根据我们的数据,对于年龄较大(17 或 18 岁)、患有精索静脉曲张且 TTV 异常的青少年,临床医生可能会降低建议 SA 的门槛,如果无法获得 SA,则应强调手术干预和/或更密切的监测。应告知患者他们的异常 SA 增加了六倍。应告知 TTV 正常的患者,他们出现异常 SA 的风险较低。对于患有精索静脉曲张且初始 TVD>20% 的年轻患者,应进行密切随访,但应将干预延迟至 17 或 18 岁,以便更好地评估 TTV。由于单次测量对发育期青少年的预测价值较低,因此应强调对患者数据进行趋势分析的重要性。我们的研究存在局限性,包括研究设计具有回顾性,以及青少年睾丸肿大与亲子关系之间缺乏统一的相关性:结论:睾丸总体积小于 29.5 毫升会使精液分析异常的几率增加六倍以上,其阴性预测值为 96.2%。超声波结果可能有助于进行风险分层,并就手术干预的适当性提供咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pediatric Urology
Journal of Pediatric Urology PEDIATRICS-UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
15.00%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Urology publishes submitted research and clinical articles relating to Pediatric Urology which have been accepted after adequate peer review. It publishes regular articles that have been submitted after invitation, that cover the curriculum of Pediatric Urology, and enable trainee surgeons to attain theoretical competence of the sub-specialty. It publishes regular reviews of pediatric urological articles appearing in other journals. It publishes invited review articles by recognised experts on modern or controversial aspects of the sub-specialty. It enables any affiliated society to advertise society events or information in the journal without charge and will publish abstracts of papers to be read at society meetings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信