Predicting Dental General Anesthesia Use among Children with Behavioral Health Conditions.

IF 2.2 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
J Peng, T J Gorham, B D Meyer
{"title":"Predicting Dental General Anesthesia Use among Children with Behavioral Health Conditions.","authors":"J Peng, T J Gorham, B D Meyer","doi":"10.1177/23800844241252817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate how different data sources affect the performance of machine learning algorithms that predict dental general anesthesia use among children with behavioral health conditions.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Observational study using claims data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Medicaid claims from Partners For Kids (2013-2019), electronic medical record data, and the Ohio Child Opportunity Index, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of 12,410 children with behavioral health diagnoses. Four lasso-regularized logistic regression models were developed to predict dental general anesthesia use, each incorporating different data sources. Lift scores, or the ratio of positive predictive value to base case prevalence, were used to compare models, and a lift score of 2.5 was considered minimally acceptable for risk prediction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dental general anesthesia use ranged from 3.2% to 3.9% across models, which made it difficult for the machine learning models to achieve high positive predictive value. Model performance was best when either the electronic medical record (lift = 2.59) or Ohio Child Opportunity Index (lift = 2.56), but not both (lift = 2.34) or neither (lift = 1.87), was used.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Incorporating additional data sources improved machine learning model performance, and 2 models achieved satisfactory performance. The model using electronic medical record data could be applied in hospital-based settings, and the model using the Ohio Child Opportunity Index could be more valuable in community-based settings.</p><p><strong>Knowledge transfer statement: </strong>Machine learning was applied to satisfactorily predict which children with behavioral health diagnoses would require dental treatment under general anesthesia. Incorporating electronic medical record data or area-level social determinants of health data, but not both, improved the performance of the machine learning predictions. The 2 highest performing models could be applied by hospitals using medical record data or by organizations using area-level social determinants of health data to risk stratify the pediatric behavioral health population.</p>","PeriodicalId":14783,"journal":{"name":"JDR Clinical & Translational Research","volume":" ","pages":"23800844241252817"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JDR Clinical & Translational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23800844241252817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate how different data sources affect the performance of machine learning algorithms that predict dental general anesthesia use among children with behavioral health conditions.

Study design: Observational study using claims data.

Methods: Using Medicaid claims from Partners For Kids (2013-2019), electronic medical record data, and the Ohio Child Opportunity Index, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of 12,410 children with behavioral health diagnoses. Four lasso-regularized logistic regression models were developed to predict dental general anesthesia use, each incorporating different data sources. Lift scores, or the ratio of positive predictive value to base case prevalence, were used to compare models, and a lift score of 2.5 was considered minimally acceptable for risk prediction.

Results: Dental general anesthesia use ranged from 3.2% to 3.9% across models, which made it difficult for the machine learning models to achieve high positive predictive value. Model performance was best when either the electronic medical record (lift = 2.59) or Ohio Child Opportunity Index (lift = 2.56), but not both (lift = 2.34) or neither (lift = 1.87), was used.

Conclusions: Incorporating additional data sources improved machine learning model performance, and 2 models achieved satisfactory performance. The model using electronic medical record data could be applied in hospital-based settings, and the model using the Ohio Child Opportunity Index could be more valuable in community-based settings.

Knowledge transfer statement: Machine learning was applied to satisfactorily predict which children with behavioral health diagnoses would require dental treatment under general anesthesia. Incorporating electronic medical record data or area-level social determinants of health data, but not both, improved the performance of the machine learning predictions. The 2 highest performing models could be applied by hospitals using medical record data or by organizations using area-level social determinants of health data to risk stratify the pediatric behavioral health population.

有行为健康问题的儿童使用牙科全身麻醉的预测。
研究目的评估不同数据源如何影响机器学习算法的性能,该算法可预测有行为健康问题的儿童使用牙科全身麻醉的情况:研究设计:使用索赔数据进行观察研究:利用来自 Partners For Kids(2013-2019 年)的医疗补助理赔、电子病历数据和俄亥俄州儿童机会指数,我们对 12,410 名有行为健康诊断的儿童进行了回顾性队列研究。我们建立了四个套索规则化逻辑回归模型来预测牙科全身麻醉的使用情况,每个模型都结合了不同的数据源。采用提升分值(即阳性预测值与基本病例患病率的比率)来比较模型,提升分值 2.5 被认为是风险预测的最低可接受值:各模型的牙科全身麻醉使用率从 3.2% 到 3.9% 不等,这使得机器学习模型难以达到较高的阳性预测值。当使用电子病历(提升值=2.59)或俄亥俄州儿童机会指数(提升值=2.56)时,模型的性能最佳,但不能同时使用(提升值=2.34)或两者都不使用(提升值=1.87):结论:纳入更多数据源可提高机器学习模型的性能,其中两个模型的性能令人满意。使用电子病历数据的模型可用于医院环境,而使用俄亥俄州儿童机会指数的模型在社区环境中更有价值:应用机器学习可以令人满意地预测哪些有行为健康诊断的儿童需要在全身麻醉的情况下进行牙科治疗。纳入电子病历数据或地区层面的健康社会决定因素数据(而非两者)可提高机器学习预测的性能。使用病历数据的医院或使用地区级社会健康决定因素数据的机构可将这两个性能最高的模型用于对儿科行为健康人群进行风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JDR Clinical & Translational Research
JDR Clinical & Translational Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: JDR Clinical & Translational Research seeks to publish the highest quality research articles on clinical and translational research including all of the dental specialties and implantology. Examples include behavioral sciences, cariology, oral & pharyngeal cancer, disease diagnostics, evidence based health care delivery, human genetics, health services research, periodontal diseases, oral medicine, radiology, and pathology. The JDR Clinical & Translational Research expands on its research content by including high-impact health care and global oral health policy statements and systematic reviews of clinical concepts affecting clinical practice. Unique to the JDR Clinical & Translational Research are advances in clinical and translational medicine articles created to focus on research with an immediate potential to affect clinical therapy outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信