Sexual dimorphism in articular tissue anatomy – Key to understanding sex differences in osteoarthritis?

IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
{"title":"Sexual dimorphism in articular tissue anatomy – Key to understanding sex differences in osteoarthritis?","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.joca.2024.05.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Osteoarthritis (OA) prevalence and incidence varies between women and men, but it is unknown whether this follows sex-specific differences in systemic factors (e.g. hormones) and/or differences in pre-morbid joint anatomy. We recognize that classifications of sex within humans cannot be reduced to female/male, but given the lack of literature on non-binary individuals, this review is limited to the sexual dimorphism of articular morphotypes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Based on a Pubmed search using relevant terms, and input from experts, we selected articles based on the authors’ judgment of their relevance, interest, originality, and scientific quality; no “hard” bibliometric measures were used to evaluate their quality or importance. Focus was on clinical rather than pre-clinical studies, with most (imaging) data being available for the knee joint.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After introducing “sexual dimorphism”, the specific literature on articular morphotypes is reviewed, structured by: radiographic joint space width (JSW), meniscus, ligaments, articular cartilage morphology, articular cartilage composition and deformation, and articular tissue response to treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Sex-specific differences were clearly observed for JSW, meniscus damage, ligament size, and cartilage morphometry (volume, thickness, and surface areas) but not for cartilage composition. Ligament and cartilage measures were smaller in women even after matching for confounders. Taken together, the findings indicate that female (knee) joints may be structurally more vulnerable and at greater risk of OA. The “one size/sex fits all” approach must be abandoned in OA research, and all observational and interventional studies should report their results for sex-specific strata, at least in pre-specified secondary or post-hoc analyses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19654,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis and Cartilage","volume":"32 9","pages":"Pages 1019-1031"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1063458424012123/pdfft?md5=8c4ae905bb1e134889f1c4cc0aa8c48f&pid=1-s2.0-S1063458424012123-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis and Cartilage","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1063458424012123","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Osteoarthritis (OA) prevalence and incidence varies between women and men, but it is unknown whether this follows sex-specific differences in systemic factors (e.g. hormones) and/or differences in pre-morbid joint anatomy. We recognize that classifications of sex within humans cannot be reduced to female/male, but given the lack of literature on non-binary individuals, this review is limited to the sexual dimorphism of articular morphotypes.

Methods

Based on a Pubmed search using relevant terms, and input from experts, we selected articles based on the authors’ judgment of their relevance, interest, originality, and scientific quality; no “hard” bibliometric measures were used to evaluate their quality or importance. Focus was on clinical rather than pre-clinical studies, with most (imaging) data being available for the knee joint.

Results

After introducing “sexual dimorphism”, the specific literature on articular morphotypes is reviewed, structured by: radiographic joint space width (JSW), meniscus, ligaments, articular cartilage morphology, articular cartilage composition and deformation, and articular tissue response to treatment.

Conclusions

Sex-specific differences were clearly observed for JSW, meniscus damage, ligament size, and cartilage morphometry (volume, thickness, and surface areas) but not for cartilage composition. Ligament and cartilage measures were smaller in women even after matching for confounders. Taken together, the findings indicate that female (knee) joints may be structurally more vulnerable and at greater risk of OA. The “one size/sex fits all” approach must be abandoned in OA research, and all observational and interventional studies should report their results for sex-specific strata, at least in pre-specified secondary or post-hoc analyses.

R1:关节组织解剖的性别二形性--了解骨关节炎性别差异的关键?
目的:骨关节炎(OA)的患病率和发病率在女性和男性之间存在差异,但这是否与全身因素(如激素)的性别差异和/或患病前关节解剖结构的差异有关,目前尚不清楚。我们认识到人类的性别分类不能简化为女性/男性,但鉴于缺乏关于非二元个体的文献,本综述仅限于关节组织的性别二态性:根据使用相关术语进行的 Pubmed 搜索和专家意见,我们根据作者对文章相关性、趣味性、原创性和科学质量的判断来选择文章;没有使用 "硬性 "文献计量方法来评估文章的质量或重要性。重点放在临床研究而非临床前研究上,大多数(成像)数据都是膝关节方面的:结果:在介绍了 "性别二形性 "之后,对有关关节结构的具体文献进行了综述,其结构包括:放射学关节间隙宽度(JSW)、半月板、韧带、关节软骨指标、关节软骨成分和变形以及关节组织对治疗的反应:在关节面宽度、半月板损伤、韧带大小和软骨指标(体积、厚度和表面积)方面,可以明显观察到性别差异,但在软骨成分方面则没有。即使匹配了混杂因素,女性的韧带和软骨指标也更小。综上所述,研究结果表明,女性(膝)关节在结构上可能更脆弱,患 OA 的风险更大。在OA研究中,必须摒弃 "一刀切/性别适用 "的方法,所有观察性和干预性研究都应报告其特定性别分层的结果,至少在预先指定的二级或事后分析中应如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
802
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: Osteoarthritis and Cartilage is the official journal of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International. It is an international, multidisciplinary journal that disseminates information for the many kinds of specialists and practitioners concerned with osteoarthritis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信