Primary Practice Patterns for the Initial Management of Open Angle Glaucoma.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Glaucoma Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1097/IJG.0000000000002453
Douglas J Rhee, Himani Sancheti, Adam L Rothman, Leon Herndon, Jacob W Brubaker, Thomas Patrianakos, Nathan Radcliffe, Amy D Zhang, Loretta Szczotka-Flynn
{"title":"Primary Practice Patterns for the Initial Management of Open Angle Glaucoma.","authors":"Douglas J Rhee, Himani Sancheti, Adam L Rothman, Leon Herndon, Jacob W Brubaker, Thomas Patrianakos, Nathan Radcliffe, Amy D Zhang, Loretta Szczotka-Flynn","doi":"10.1097/IJG.0000000000002453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Prcis: </strong>About one-fourth of survey respondents from an ASCRS database initiate treatment for primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) with laser trabeculoplasty. Factors impacting physicians' choice of laser versus topical treatment for POAG were explored.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To characterize primary treatment preferences (topical medication versus laser trabeculoplasty or intracameral sustained release implants) in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) patients and determine factors related to primary intervention selection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 33-question survey was distributed to an American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery database on treatment choices made by ophthalmologists for POAG. Data collected included country of practice, years of practice, completion of glaucoma fellowship training, type of practice, and preference for the first line of treatment for POAG. Multiple logit regression was used to compare the effect of covariates on physicians' choice of either topical medication or laser trabeculoplasty for POAG.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 252 of 19,246 (1.3%) surveys were returned. Almost three-quarters of respondents used topical medication as the first line of treatment for POAG (73.6%), whereas 26.4% preferred to start with laser treatment. Significant variables associated with the selection of laser (vs. drops) are practicing in the United States (odds ratio [OR] 2.85; 95% CI, 1.33-6.10), the more recent completion of ophthalmology residency (OR 1.95; 95% CI, 1.00-3.77), the greater volume of minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) (OR 1.68; 95% CI, 1.18-2.40), and a glaucoma patient base greater than 25% (OR 2.21; 95% CI, 1.09-4.48).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For the first-line treatment of POAG, laser trabeculoplasty is more likely to be preferred, over topical drops, by U.S. physicians who are relatively new in practice, who have a larger glaucoma patient base, and who perform more MIGS.</p>","PeriodicalId":15938,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Glaucoma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002453","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prcis: About one-fourth of survey respondents from an ASCRS database initiate treatment for primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) with laser trabeculoplasty. Factors impacting physicians' choice of laser versus topical treatment for POAG were explored.

Purpose: To characterize primary treatment preferences (topical medication versus laser trabeculoplasty or intracameral sustained release implants) in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) patients and determine factors related to primary intervention selection.

Methods: A 33-question survey was distributed to an American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery database on treatment choices made by ophthalmologists for POAG. Data collected included country of practice, years of practice, completion of glaucoma fellowship training, type of practice, and preference for the first line of treatment for POAG. Multiple logit regression was used to compare the effect of covariates on physicians' choice of either topical medication or laser trabeculoplasty for POAG.

Results: A total of 252 of 19,246 (1.3%) surveys were returned. Almost three-quarters of respondents used topical medication as the first line of treatment for POAG (73.6%), whereas 26.4% preferred to start with laser treatment. Significant variables associated with the selection of laser (vs. drops) are practicing in the United States (odds ratio [OR] 2.85; 95% CI, 1.33-6.10), the more recent completion of ophthalmology residency (OR 1.95; 95% CI, 1.00-3.77), the greater volume of minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) (OR 1.68; 95% CI, 1.18-2.40), and a glaucoma patient base greater than 25% (OR 2.21; 95% CI, 1.09-4.48).

Conclusions: For the first-line treatment of POAG, laser trabeculoplasty is more likely to be preferred, over topical drops, by U.S. physicians who are relatively new in practice, who have a larger glaucoma patient base, and who perform more MIGS.

开角型青光眼初始治疗的初级实践模式。
Prcis:在 ASCRS 数据库的调查对象中,约 1/4 的原发性开角型青光眼 (POAG) 患者开始接受激光小梁成形术治疗。目的:描述原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)患者的主要治疗偏好(局部用药与激光小梁成形术或巩膜内持续释放植入物),并确定与主要干预选择相关的因素:向美国白内障与屈光手术学会数据库分发了一份包含 33 个问题的调查问卷,内容涉及眼科医生对 POAG 治疗方法的选择。收集的数据包括执业国家、执业年限、青光眼研究员培训完成情况、执业类型以及对 POAG 一线治疗的偏好。采用多元对数回归法比较协变量对医生选择局部用药或激光小梁成形术治疗 POAG 的影响:共收回 252/19,246 份调查问卷(1.3%)。近四分之三的受访者将局部用药作为治疗 POAG 的一线疗法(73.6%),而 26.4% 的受访者倾向于从激光治疗开始。与选择激光治疗(与滴眼液治疗)相关的重要变量包括:在美国执业(几率比 [OR] 2.85,95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.33-6.10)、最近完成眼科住院医师培训(OR 1.95,95% CI 1.00-3.77),更多的微创青光眼手术(MIGS)(OR 1.68,95% CI 1.18-2.40),青光眼患者基数大于 25%(OR 2.21,95% CI 1.09-4.48):结论:对于POAG的一线治疗,激光小梁成形术比局部滴眼液更容易被那些刚开始执业、青光眼患者基数较大、实施MIGS较多的美国医生所青睐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Glaucoma
Journal of Glaucoma 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Glaucoma is a peer reviewed journal addressing the spectrum of issues affecting definition, diagnosis, and management of glaucoma and providing a forum for lively and stimulating discussion of clinical, scientific, and socioeconomic factors affecting care of glaucoma patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信