Explainable Boosting Machine approach identifies risk factors for acute renal failure.

IF 2.8 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Andreas Körner, Benjamin Sailer, Sibel Sari-Yavuz, Helene A Haeberle, Valbona Mirakaj, Alice Bernard, Peter Rosenberger, Michael Koeppen
{"title":"Explainable Boosting Machine approach identifies risk factors for acute renal failure.","authors":"Andreas Körner, Benjamin Sailer, Sibel Sari-Yavuz, Helene A Haeberle, Valbona Mirakaj, Alice Bernard, Peter Rosenberger, Michael Koeppen","doi":"10.1186/s40635-024-00639-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Risk stratification and outcome prediction are crucial for intensive care resource planning. In addressing the large data sets of intensive care unit (ICU) patients, we employed the Explainable Boosting Machine (EBM), a novel machine learning model, to identify determinants of acute kidney injury (AKI) in these patients. AKI significantly impacts outcomes in the critically ill.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An analysis of 3572 ICU patients was conducted. Variables such as average central venous pressure (CVP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), age, gender, and comorbidities were examined. This analysis combined traditional statistical methods with the EBM to gain a detailed understanding of AKI risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis revealed chronic kidney disease, heart failure, arrhythmias, liver disease, and anemia as significant comorbidities influencing AKI risk, with liver disease and anemia being particularly impactful. Surgical factors were also key; lower GI surgery heightened AKI risk, while neurosurgery was associated with a reduced risk. EBM identified four crucial variables affecting AKI prediction: anemia, liver disease, and average CVP increased AKI risk, whereas neurosurgery decreased it. Age was a progressive risk factor, with risk escalating after the age of 50 years. Hemodynamic instability, marked by a MAP below 65 mmHg, was strongly linked to AKI, showcasing a threshold effect at 60 mmHg. Intriguingly, average CVP was a significant predictor, with a critical threshold at 10.7 mmHg.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using an Explainable Boosting Machine enhance the precision in AKI risk factors in ICU patients, providing a more nuanced understanding of known AKI risks. This approach allows for refined predictive modeling of AKI, effectively overcoming the limitations of traditional statistical models.</p>","PeriodicalId":13750,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","volume":"12 1","pages":"55"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11178719/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-024-00639-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Risk stratification and outcome prediction are crucial for intensive care resource planning. In addressing the large data sets of intensive care unit (ICU) patients, we employed the Explainable Boosting Machine (EBM), a novel machine learning model, to identify determinants of acute kidney injury (AKI) in these patients. AKI significantly impacts outcomes in the critically ill.

Methods: An analysis of 3572 ICU patients was conducted. Variables such as average central venous pressure (CVP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), age, gender, and comorbidities were examined. This analysis combined traditional statistical methods with the EBM to gain a detailed understanding of AKI risk factors.

Results: Our analysis revealed chronic kidney disease, heart failure, arrhythmias, liver disease, and anemia as significant comorbidities influencing AKI risk, with liver disease and anemia being particularly impactful. Surgical factors were also key; lower GI surgery heightened AKI risk, while neurosurgery was associated with a reduced risk. EBM identified four crucial variables affecting AKI prediction: anemia, liver disease, and average CVP increased AKI risk, whereas neurosurgery decreased it. Age was a progressive risk factor, with risk escalating after the age of 50 years. Hemodynamic instability, marked by a MAP below 65 mmHg, was strongly linked to AKI, showcasing a threshold effect at 60 mmHg. Intriguingly, average CVP was a significant predictor, with a critical threshold at 10.7 mmHg.

Conclusion: Using an Explainable Boosting Machine enhance the precision in AKI risk factors in ICU patients, providing a more nuanced understanding of known AKI risks. This approach allows for refined predictive modeling of AKI, effectively overcoming the limitations of traditional statistical models.

可解释提升机方法可识别急性肾衰竭的风险因素。
背景:风险分层和结果预测对于重症监护资源规划至关重要。在处理重症监护病房(ICU)患者的大型数据集时,我们采用了一种新型机器学习模型--可解释提升机(EBM)来确定这些患者急性肾损伤(AKI)的决定因素。AKI 严重影响重症患者的预后:对 3572 名重症监护室患者进行了分析。对平均中心静脉压(CVP)、平均动脉压(MAP)、年龄、性别和合并症等变量进行了研究。这项分析结合了传统统计方法和 EBM,以详细了解 AKI 风险因素:我们的分析表明,慢性肾病、心力衰竭、心律失常、肝病和贫血是影响 AKI 风险的重要合并症,其中肝病和贫血的影响尤其大。手术因素也很关键;下消化道手术增加了 AKI 风险,而神经外科手术则降低了风险。EBM 确定了影响 AKI 预测的四个关键变量:贫血、肝病和平均 CVP 会增加 AKI 风险,而神经外科手术会降低风险。年龄是一个渐进的风险因素,50 岁以后风险上升。血流动力学不稳定(以血压低于 65 mmHg 为标志)与 AKI 密切相关,在 60 mmHg 时显示出阈值效应。耐人寻味的是,平均 CVP 是一个重要的预测因子,临界值为 10.7 mmHg:结论:使用可解释增强机提高了 ICU 患者 AKI 风险因素的精确度,使人们对已知的 AKI 风险有了更细致的了解。这种方法允许对 AKI 建立精细的预测模型,有效克服了传统统计模型的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信