APPaRENT 3: Asthma Patients’ and Physicians' Perspectives on the Burden and Management of Asthma in Seven Countries

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Bhumika Aggarwal, Mohamed Al-Moamary, Riyad Allehebi, Ashraf Alzaabi, Mona Al-Ahmad, Muhammad Amin, Triya Damayanti, Nguyen Van Tho, Pham Thi Le Quyen, Thitiwat Sriprasart, Orapan Poachanukoon, Andrea Ban Yu-Lin, Ahmad Izuanuddin Ismail, Maria Encarnita B. Limpin, Steven Koenig, Gur Levy, Abhay Phansalkar, Farouz Rafih, Mark Silvey, Laura Miriams, Gary Milligan
{"title":"APPaRENT 3: Asthma Patients’ and Physicians' Perspectives on the Burden and Management of Asthma in Seven Countries","authors":"Bhumika Aggarwal,&nbsp;Mohamed Al-Moamary,&nbsp;Riyad Allehebi,&nbsp;Ashraf Alzaabi,&nbsp;Mona Al-Ahmad,&nbsp;Muhammad Amin,&nbsp;Triya Damayanti,&nbsp;Nguyen Van Tho,&nbsp;Pham Thi Le Quyen,&nbsp;Thitiwat Sriprasart,&nbsp;Orapan Poachanukoon,&nbsp;Andrea Ban Yu-Lin,&nbsp;Ahmad Izuanuddin Ismail,&nbsp;Maria Encarnita B. Limpin,&nbsp;Steven Koenig,&nbsp;Gur Levy,&nbsp;Abhay Phansalkar,&nbsp;Farouz Rafih,&nbsp;Mark Silvey,&nbsp;Laura Miriams,&nbsp;Gary Milligan","doi":"10.1007/s12325-024-02900-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Asthma management is strongly dependent on physician and patient beliefs and perceptions about the disease and its long-term treatment. The APPaRENT 3 study was conducted to explore factors influencing treatment choice and to understand patients’ and physicians’ attitudes and perspectives on the use of controller inhalers in regular versus flexible dosing for asthma management.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional survey of patients with asthma and treating physicians was conducted in seven countries: Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam (patient survey only), Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. Assessment was carried out through an online/face-to-face questionnaire, where patients’ viewpoints were focused on their attitudes and beliefs about asthma and treatment adherence, whereas physicians’ viewpoints were gathered on their attitudes and beliefs about asthma management, knowledge of and adherence to asthma treatment guidelines, and asthma treatment regimens.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 1400 patients (mean age, 34 years) and 599 physicians (mean age, 43 years) were included in the survey. Physicians similarly prioritised symptom control (39%) and exacerbation reduction (40%) in moderate asthma, whereas patients prioritised symptom control (41%) over exacerbation reduction (22%). Although both groups (physicians, 86%; patients, 84%) perceived asthma as well-controlled, poor management was evident based on Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores (mean, 15.7; standard deviation, 4.14; 82% had an ACT score &lt; 20) and high symptom burden (39% reported nighttime awakenings or early mornings ≥ 2 nights/week). Most patients (76%) with moderate asthma were prescribed regular dosing, with the most common treatment being inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting β<sub>2</sub>-agonist (LABA) with as-needed inhaled short-acting β<sub>2</sub>-agonist (SABA; 20%). Among patients on maintenance and reliever therapy, 93% of patients received a separate inhaled reliever.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite high symptom burden, patients overestimated their level of asthma control. Physicians prioritised controlling symptoms and reducing exacerbations as treatment goals for moderate asthma, often prescribing regular dosing with ICS/LABA with as-needed inhaled SABA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11263244/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-024-02900-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Asthma management is strongly dependent on physician and patient beliefs and perceptions about the disease and its long-term treatment. The APPaRENT 3 study was conducted to explore factors influencing treatment choice and to understand patients’ and physicians’ attitudes and perspectives on the use of controller inhalers in regular versus flexible dosing for asthma management.

Methods

This cross-sectional survey of patients with asthma and treating physicians was conducted in seven countries: Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam (patient survey only), Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. Assessment was carried out through an online/face-to-face questionnaire, where patients’ viewpoints were focused on their attitudes and beliefs about asthma and treatment adherence, whereas physicians’ viewpoints were gathered on their attitudes and beliefs about asthma management, knowledge of and adherence to asthma treatment guidelines, and asthma treatment regimens.

Results

Overall, 1400 patients (mean age, 34 years) and 599 physicians (mean age, 43 years) were included in the survey. Physicians similarly prioritised symptom control (39%) and exacerbation reduction (40%) in moderate asthma, whereas patients prioritised symptom control (41%) over exacerbation reduction (22%). Although both groups (physicians, 86%; patients, 84%) perceived asthma as well-controlled, poor management was evident based on Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores (mean, 15.7; standard deviation, 4.14; 82% had an ACT score < 20) and high symptom burden (39% reported nighttime awakenings or early mornings ≥ 2 nights/week). Most patients (76%) with moderate asthma were prescribed regular dosing, with the most common treatment being inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) with as-needed inhaled short-acting β2-agonist (SABA; 20%). Among patients on maintenance and reliever therapy, 93% of patients received a separate inhaled reliever.

Conclusions

Despite high symptom burden, patients overestimated their level of asthma control. Physicians prioritised controlling symptoms and reducing exacerbations as treatment goals for moderate asthma, often prescribing regular dosing with ICS/LABA with as-needed inhaled SABA.

Abstract Image

附录 3:七个国家的哮喘患者和医生对哮喘负担和管理的看法。
导言:哮喘治疗在很大程度上取决于医生和患者对疾病及其长期治疗的信念和看法。APPaRENT 3 研究旨在探讨影响治疗选择的因素,并了解患者和医生对在哮喘治疗中使用常规剂量与灵活剂量的控制吸入器的态度和观点:这项针对哮喘患者和主治医生的横断面调查在七个国家进行:印度尼西亚、马来西亚、菲律宾、泰国、越南(仅限患者调查)、沙特阿拉伯和阿拉伯联合酋长国。评估通过在线/面对面问卷进行,其中患者的观点主要集中在他们对哮喘和坚持治疗的态度和信念上,而医生的观点则集中在他们对哮喘管理的态度和信念、对哮喘治疗指南的了解和坚持以及哮喘治疗方案上:共有 1400 名患者(平均年龄 34 岁)和 599 名医生(平均年龄 43 岁)参与了调查。在中度哮喘患者中,医生同样优先考虑控制症状(39%)和减少病情恶化(40%),而患者优先考虑控制症状(41%)而不是减少病情恶化(22%)。尽管两组患者(医生,86%;患者,84%)都认为哮喘控制得很好,但根据哮喘控制测试(ACT)得分(平均值,15.7;标准差,4.14;82%的患者 ACT 得分为 2-激动剂(LABA),20%为按需吸入短效 β2-激动剂(SABA)),管理不善的情况显而易见。在接受维持和缓解治疗的患者中,93%的患者接受了单独的吸入缓解治疗:尽管症状负担很重,但患者高估了自己的哮喘控制水平。医生将控制症状和减少病情恶化作为中度哮喘的优先治疗目标,通常会处方常规剂量的 ICS/LABA 和按需吸入的 SABA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Therapy
Advances in Therapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
353
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信