Failure to rescue following emergency general surgery: A national analysis

IF 1.4 Q3 SURGERY
Jeffrey Balian, Nam Yong Cho BS, Amulya Vadlakonda BS, Oh. Jin Kwon MD, Giselle Porter BS, Saad Mallick MD, Peyman Benharash MD
{"title":"Failure to rescue following emergency general surgery: A national analysis","authors":"Jeffrey Balian,&nbsp;Nam Yong Cho BS,&nbsp;Amulya Vadlakonda BS,&nbsp;Oh. Jin Kwon MD,&nbsp;Giselle Porter BS,&nbsp;Saad Mallick MD,&nbsp;Peyman Benharash MD","doi":"10.1016/j.sopen.2024.05.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Failure to rescue (FTR) is increasingly recognized as a quality metric but remains understudied in emergency general surgery (EGS). We sought to identify patient and operative factors associated with FTR to better inform standardized metrics to mitigate this potentially preventable event.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All adult (≥18 years) non-elective hospitalizations for large bowel resection, small bowel resection, repair of perforated ulcer, laparotomy and lysis of adhesions were identified in the 2016–2020 National Readmissions Database. Patients undergoing trauma-related operations or procedures ≤2 days of admission were excluded. FTR was defined as in-hospital death following acute kidney injury requiring dialysis (AKI), myocardial infarction, pneumonia, respiratory failure, sepsis, stroke, or thromboembolism. Multilevel mixed-effect models were developed to assess factors linked with FTR.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 826,548 EGS operations satisfying inclusion criteria, 298,062 (36.1 %) developed at least one MAE. Of those experiencing MAE, 43,477 (14.6 %) ultimately did not survive to discharge (FTR). Following adjustment for fixed hospital level effects, only 3.5 % of the variance in FTR was attributable to center-level differences. Relative to private insurance and the highest income quartile, Medicaid insurance (AOR 1.33; 95%CI, 1.23–1.43) and the lowest income quartile (AOR 1.22; 95%CI, 1.17–1.29) were linked with increased odds of FTR.</p><p>A subset analysis stratified complication-specific rates of FTR by insurance status. Relative to private insurance, Medicaid coverage and uninsured status were linked with greater odds of FTR following perioperative sepsis, pneumonia, and AKI.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings underscore the need for increased screening and vigilance following perioperative complications to mitigate disparities in patient outcomes following high-risk EGS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74892,"journal":{"name":"Surgery open science","volume":"20 ","pages":"Pages 77-81"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024000745/pdfft?md5=2c4d4ed6f1b40fbf3f0f67ad56b22c8b&pid=1-s2.0-S2589845024000745-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024000745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Failure to rescue (FTR) is increasingly recognized as a quality metric but remains understudied in emergency general surgery (EGS). We sought to identify patient and operative factors associated with FTR to better inform standardized metrics to mitigate this potentially preventable event.

Methods

All adult (≥18 years) non-elective hospitalizations for large bowel resection, small bowel resection, repair of perforated ulcer, laparotomy and lysis of adhesions were identified in the 2016–2020 National Readmissions Database. Patients undergoing trauma-related operations or procedures ≤2 days of admission were excluded. FTR was defined as in-hospital death following acute kidney injury requiring dialysis (AKI), myocardial infarction, pneumonia, respiratory failure, sepsis, stroke, or thromboembolism. Multilevel mixed-effect models were developed to assess factors linked with FTR.

Results

Among 826,548 EGS operations satisfying inclusion criteria, 298,062 (36.1 %) developed at least one MAE. Of those experiencing MAE, 43,477 (14.6 %) ultimately did not survive to discharge (FTR). Following adjustment for fixed hospital level effects, only 3.5 % of the variance in FTR was attributable to center-level differences. Relative to private insurance and the highest income quartile, Medicaid insurance (AOR 1.33; 95%CI, 1.23–1.43) and the lowest income quartile (AOR 1.22; 95%CI, 1.17–1.29) were linked with increased odds of FTR.

A subset analysis stratified complication-specific rates of FTR by insurance status. Relative to private insurance, Medicaid coverage and uninsured status were linked with greater odds of FTR following perioperative sepsis, pneumonia, and AKI.

Conclusion

Our findings underscore the need for increased screening and vigilance following perioperative complications to mitigate disparities in patient outcomes following high-risk EGS.

普外科急诊手术后抢救失败:全国分析
背景抢救失败(FTR)越来越被认为是一项质量指标,但对急诊普外科(EGS)的研究仍然不足。我们试图确定与 FTR 相关的患者和手术因素,以便更好地为标准化指标提供信息,从而减少这一潜在的可预防事件。方法在 2016-2020 年国家再入院数据库中确定了所有因大肠切除术、小肠切除术、穿孔溃疡修补术、开腹手术和粘连裂解术而非选择性住院的成人(≥18 岁)。不包括入院后2天内接受创伤相关手术或程序的患者。FTR定义为急性肾损伤(需要透析)、心肌梗死、肺炎、呼吸衰竭、败血症、中风或血栓栓塞后的院内死亡。结果在 826,548 例符合纳入标准的 EGS 手术中,298,062 例(36.1%)发生了至少一次 MAE。在出现 MAE 的患者中,43,477 人(14.6%)最终未能出院(FTR)。在对固定的医院水平效应进行调整后,只有 3.5% 的 FTR 变异可归因于中心水平的差异。相对于私人保险和最高收入四分位数,医疗补助保险(AOR 1.33;95%CI,1.23-1.43)和最低收入四分位数(AOR 1.22;95%CI,1.17-1.29)与FTR几率增加有关。与私人保险相比,医疗补助保险和无保险状态与围手术期脓毒症、肺炎和 AKI 后发生 FTR 的几率更大相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信