Different diversity patterns of butterfly and moth assemblages between deciduous and evergreen broad-leaf forests

IF 1.1 3区 农林科学 Q3 ENTOMOLOGY
Na-Hyun Ahn , Sang-Hun Lee , Sang-Hak Han , Sei-Woong Choi
{"title":"Different diversity patterns of butterfly and moth assemblages between deciduous and evergreen broad-leaf forests","authors":"Na-Hyun Ahn ,&nbsp;Sang-Hun Lee ,&nbsp;Sang-Hak Han ,&nbsp;Sei-Woong Choi","doi":"10.1016/j.aspen.2024.102278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, we compared the diversity and abundance of two groups of Lepidopteran insects—butterflies and moths—across deciduous (DBL) and evergreen broad-leaved (EBL) tree communities in warm temperate forests. Over three years (from 2018 to 2020) at the Wando Arboretum, we used transect and point methods to sample butterflies and light traps to sample moths. Our findings revealed that the total estimated species richness was higher in EBL compared to DBL. Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis confirmed distinct moth assemblages between the two tree communities, while butterfly assemblages did not exhibit such separation. The seasonal diversity patterns of butterflies in both forests differed significantly, whereas those of moths exhibited a similar trend with a peak in June. Beta diversity components indicated high turnover rates in moth assemblages across both tree communities and high nestedness in butterfly assemblages within the DBL. Although the diet breadth of butterflies and moths did not significantly differ between the two tree communities, the number of butterfly species per host plant was higher in DBL and that of moths was higher in EBL. Considering the ongoing vegetation transition from DBL to EBL, changes in forest structure—such as canopy openness and tree density—may adversely impact insect communities within DBL.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asia-pacific Entomology","volume":"27 3","pages":"Article 102278"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asia-pacific Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1226861524000839","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we compared the diversity and abundance of two groups of Lepidopteran insects—butterflies and moths—across deciduous (DBL) and evergreen broad-leaved (EBL) tree communities in warm temperate forests. Over three years (from 2018 to 2020) at the Wando Arboretum, we used transect and point methods to sample butterflies and light traps to sample moths. Our findings revealed that the total estimated species richness was higher in EBL compared to DBL. Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis confirmed distinct moth assemblages between the two tree communities, while butterfly assemblages did not exhibit such separation. The seasonal diversity patterns of butterflies in both forests differed significantly, whereas those of moths exhibited a similar trend with a peak in June. Beta diversity components indicated high turnover rates in moth assemblages across both tree communities and high nestedness in butterfly assemblages within the DBL. Although the diet breadth of butterflies and moths did not significantly differ between the two tree communities, the number of butterfly species per host plant was higher in DBL and that of moths was higher in EBL. Considering the ongoing vegetation transition from DBL to EBL, changes in forest structure—such as canopy openness and tree density—may adversely impact insect communities within DBL.

Abstract Image

落叶林和常绿阔叶林中蝴蝶和蛾类群落的不同多样性模式
在这项研究中,我们比较了暖温带森林落叶树群落(DBL)和常绿阔叶树群落(EBL)两类鳞翅目昆虫--蝶类和蛾类--的多样性和丰度。在万户植物园的三年时间里(从 2018 年到 2020 年),我们使用横断面和点法对蝴蝶进行采样,并使用灯光诱捕器对飞蛾进行采样。我们的研究结果表明,与DBL相比,EBL的总估计物种丰富度更高。非度量多维尺度(NMDS)分析证实了两个树木群落之间不同的蛾类群落,而蝴蝶群落则没有表现出这种分离。两片森林中蝴蝶的季节多样性模式差异显著,而飞蛾的季节多样性模式则表现出相似的趋势,在 6 月份达到高峰。贝塔多样性成分表明,两种树木群落中的蛾类群落更替率较高,而DBL内的蝴蝶群落嵌套度较高。虽然两种树木群落中蝴蝶和飞蛾的食性广度没有显著差异,但 DBL 中每种寄主植物的蝴蝶种类数量较多,而 EBL 中飞蛾的种类数量较多。考虑到后海湾地区的植被正在向后海湾地区过渡,森林结构的变化(如树冠开阔度和树木密度)可能会对后海湾地区的昆虫群落产生不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Asia-pacific Entomology
Journal of Asia-pacific Entomology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Insect Science
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
152
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original research papers, review articles and short communications in the basic and applied area concerning insects, mites or other arthropods and nematodes of economic importance in agriculture, forestry, industry, human and animal health, and natural resource and environment management, and is the official journal of the Korean Society of Applied Entomology and the Taiwan Entomological Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信