Breaking the hierarchy: Exploring intersectional employment strategies in the Australian mining industry for Indigenous women

IF 3.6 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Joni Parmenter , Sharlene Leroy-Dyer , Sarah Holcombe
{"title":"Breaking the hierarchy: Exploring intersectional employment strategies in the Australian mining industry for Indigenous women","authors":"Joni Parmenter ,&nbsp;Sharlene Leroy-Dyer ,&nbsp;Sarah Holcombe","doi":"10.1016/j.exis.2024.101480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Australian mining industry is male and non-Indigenous dominated. Indigenous women continue to perceive themselves as occupying the bottom position on the mine site hierarchy. They experience both racism, sexism, and additional burdens to their male counterparts. Indigenous women have resisted and supported each other against racism including creating formal networks across Australia. It is unknown what, if anything, the industry is doing to break down this hierarchy. Given Indigenous employment data is not typically disaggregated by gender, the cohort has remained largely overlooked in terms of policy or strategy aimed at this group. This paper takes an intersectional approach to understanding what employment policy and practice may assist in dismantling the hierarchy. Qualitative research identified three major themes requiring action: Managing intersectional pressures at work; Intersectionality and career opportunities; and Intersectional risks at work.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47848,"journal":{"name":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 101480"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X24000789/pdfft?md5=dbed4ae6114ac22fa4e80021841bd900&pid=1-s2.0-S2214790X24000789-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X24000789","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Australian mining industry is male and non-Indigenous dominated. Indigenous women continue to perceive themselves as occupying the bottom position on the mine site hierarchy. They experience both racism, sexism, and additional burdens to their male counterparts. Indigenous women have resisted and supported each other against racism including creating formal networks across Australia. It is unknown what, if anything, the industry is doing to break down this hierarchy. Given Indigenous employment data is not typically disaggregated by gender, the cohort has remained largely overlooked in terms of policy or strategy aimed at this group. This paper takes an intersectional approach to understanding what employment policy and practice may assist in dismantling the hierarchy. Qualitative research identified three major themes requiring action: Managing intersectional pressures at work; Intersectionality and career opportunities; and Intersectional risks at work.

打破等级制度:探索澳大利亚采矿业中土著妇女的交叉就业战略
澳大利亚采矿业以男性和非土著人为主。土著妇女仍然认为自己在矿区处于最底层。她们经历着种族主义和性别歧视,承受着比男性同行更多的负担。土著妇女相互抵制和支持反对种族主义,包括在澳大利亚各地建立正式网络。目前尚不清楚该行业为打破这种等级制度采取了哪些措施。鉴于原住民就业数据通常不按性别分列,针对这一群体的政策或战略在很大程度上仍然忽视了这一群体。本文采用交叉的方法来了解哪些就业政策和实践可能有助于打破这种等级制度。定性研究确定了需要采取行动的三大主题:工作中的交叉压力管理;交叉性与职业机会;以及工作中的交叉风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信