The use of an embryo transfer simulator to compare transfer techniques and pregnancy outcomes among physicians

Dana B. McQueen M.D. , Ali Borazjani M.D., Ph.D. , Chen Yeh M.S. , Siyuan Dong M.S. , Magdy P. Milad M.D., M.S. , Eve C. Feinberg M.D.
{"title":"The use of an embryo transfer simulator to compare transfer techniques and pregnancy outcomes among physicians","authors":"Dana B. McQueen M.D. ,&nbsp;Ali Borazjani M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Chen Yeh M.S. ,&nbsp;Siyuan Dong M.S. ,&nbsp;Magdy P. Milad M.D., M.S. ,&nbsp;Eve C. Feinberg M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.xfre.2024.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the association between embryo transfer techniques and pregnancy outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>This is a prospective observational study with a retrospective cohort.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>University Clinic.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>Patients underwent embryo transfers between 2015 and 2020.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention/Exposure</h3><p>Fourteen physicians performed 25 mock embryo transfers on the embryo transfer simulator and completed a questionnaire assessing preferred embryo transfer techniques. Quantitative performance metrics on the embryo transfer simulator were measured. Individual physician embryo transfer success rates were retrospectively collected from all fresh and cryopreserved embryo transfers between January 1, 2015, and January 1, 2020. Associations between embryo transfer techniques (preferred technique and simulator performance metrics) and each physician’s historical patient pregnancy outcomes were assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>Associations between embryo transfer techniques and live births were assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were significant differences in embryo transfer techniques between physicians, including touches to the fundus, distance to the fundus, duration of embryo transfer, duration of the complete procedure, time spent navigating the cervical canal, velocity of embryo expulsion, time waited after embryo expulsion, and total score on the embryo transfer simulator. After controlling for confounders and multiple transfers per physician, the duration of embryo transfer was significantly associated with live birth, with longer durations associated with decreased live birth rates. Shorter placement distance to the fundus and higher velocity of embryo expulsion were both significantly associated with higher rates of ectopic pregnancy.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study revealed significant differences in transfer techniques among physicians. The use of the embryo transfer simulator for physicians in practice can elucidate differences and create opportunities for data-driven improvement in embryo transfer success rates.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34409,"journal":{"name":"FS Reports","volume":"5 2","pages":"Pages 183-188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666334124000503/pdfft?md5=5e67538252a37ddfd46cc9c8971330b9&pid=1-s2.0-S2666334124000503-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FS Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666334124000503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the association between embryo transfer techniques and pregnancy outcomes.

Design

This is a prospective observational study with a retrospective cohort.

Setting

University Clinic.

Patients

Patients underwent embryo transfers between 2015 and 2020.

Intervention/Exposure

Fourteen physicians performed 25 mock embryo transfers on the embryo transfer simulator and completed a questionnaire assessing preferred embryo transfer techniques. Quantitative performance metrics on the embryo transfer simulator were measured. Individual physician embryo transfer success rates were retrospectively collected from all fresh and cryopreserved embryo transfers between January 1, 2015, and January 1, 2020. Associations between embryo transfer techniques (preferred technique and simulator performance metrics) and each physician’s historical patient pregnancy outcomes were assessed.

Main Outcome Measures

Associations between embryo transfer techniques and live births were assessed.

Results

There were significant differences in embryo transfer techniques between physicians, including touches to the fundus, distance to the fundus, duration of embryo transfer, duration of the complete procedure, time spent navigating the cervical canal, velocity of embryo expulsion, time waited after embryo expulsion, and total score on the embryo transfer simulator. After controlling for confounders and multiple transfers per physician, the duration of embryo transfer was significantly associated with live birth, with longer durations associated with decreased live birth rates. Shorter placement distance to the fundus and higher velocity of embryo expulsion were both significantly associated with higher rates of ectopic pregnancy.

Conclusions

This study revealed significant differences in transfer techniques among physicians. The use of the embryo transfer simulator for physicians in practice can elucidate differences and create opportunities for data-driven improvement in embryo transfer success rates.

使用胚胎移植模拟器比较医生之间的移植技术和妊娠结果
干预/暴露14名医生在胚胎移植模拟器上进行了25次模拟胚胎移植,并填写了一份评估首选胚胎移植技术的问卷。对胚胎移植模拟器上的量化性能指标进行了测量。从2015年1月1日至2020年1月1日期间的所有新鲜和冷冻胚胎移植中回顾性地收集了医生个人的胚胎移植成功率。评估了胚胎移植技术(首选技术和模拟器性能指标)与每位医生历史患者妊娠结果之间的关联。结果不同医生的胚胎移植技术存在明显差异,包括触及宫底的距离、到宫底的距离、胚胎移植持续时间、整个手术持续时间、宫颈管导航时间、胚胎排出速度、胚胎排出后等待的时间以及胚胎移植模拟器的总分。在控制了混杂因素和每位医生的多次移植后,胚胎移植的持续时间与活产率显著相关,持续时间越长,活产率越低。较短的胚胎植入距离和较快的胚胎排出速度都与较高的异位妊娠率有显著相关。医生在实践中使用胚胎移植模拟器可以阐明差异,并为以数据为导向提高胚胎移植成功率创造机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
FS Reports
FS Reports Medicine-Embryology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信