[The Connection between Objective and Subjective Attributions of a Migration Background with Perceived Discrimination and Racism].

Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1055/a-2305-7890
Yuriy Nesterko, Jannes Jacobsen, Jonas Köhler, Heide Glaesmer
{"title":"[The Connection between Objective and Subjective Attributions of a Migration Background with Perceived Discrimination and Racism].","authors":"Yuriy Nesterko, Jannes Jacobsen, Jonas Köhler, Heide Glaesmer","doi":"10.1055/a-2305-7890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The criteria-oriented assessment of the population with a migration background that is common in Germany is currently being criticized from a social science and methodological perspective, among others. In particular, its usefulness as an indicator of perceived discrimination against the population with a migration background can be critically questioned based on the current state of research METHOD: Based on a population-representative data set (N=1,989) for the city of Berlin, the subjective perception of a migration background based on self-attribution and anticipated external attribution of a migration background was recorded in addition to the objective assessment of a migration background. Furthermore, socio-demographic and migration-specific characteristics as well as perceived discrimination were assessed. Using descriptive and inferential statistical methods, differences between the objective and subjective assessment of a migration background and their relationship with perceived discrimination were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Less than half (38%, 154/400) of the respondents identified as having a migrant background using the criterion-oriented approach reported describing themselves as migrants. 36% (144/405) reported that they believed that others in Germany described them as a person with a migrantion background. Respondents with a migration background are significantly more likely to experience discrimination on grounds of skin color, religion or country of origin compared to respondents without a migration background. Furthermore, it was found that both the self-attribution and the anticipated attribution by others as a migrant are positively associated with experiences of discrimination and racism.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results suggest that migration-sensitive research should not simply differentiate between people with and without a migration background according to official criteria. Rather, the subjective perceptions of one's own attribution as a migrant seem more suitable as indicators of discrimination and should be taken into account in future research or surveys on experiences of discrimination.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2305-7890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The criteria-oriented assessment of the population with a migration background that is common in Germany is currently being criticized from a social science and methodological perspective, among others. In particular, its usefulness as an indicator of perceived discrimination against the population with a migration background can be critically questioned based on the current state of research METHOD: Based on a population-representative data set (N=1,989) for the city of Berlin, the subjective perception of a migration background based on self-attribution and anticipated external attribution of a migration background was recorded in addition to the objective assessment of a migration background. Furthermore, socio-demographic and migration-specific characteristics as well as perceived discrimination were assessed. Using descriptive and inferential statistical methods, differences between the objective and subjective assessment of a migration background and their relationship with perceived discrimination were analyzed.

Results: Less than half (38%, 154/400) of the respondents identified as having a migrant background using the criterion-oriented approach reported describing themselves as migrants. 36% (144/405) reported that they believed that others in Germany described them as a person with a migrantion background. Respondents with a migration background are significantly more likely to experience discrimination on grounds of skin color, religion or country of origin compared to respondents without a migration background. Furthermore, it was found that both the self-attribution and the anticipated attribution by others as a migrant are positively associated with experiences of discrimination and racism.

Discussion: The results suggest that migration-sensitive research should not simply differentiate between people with and without a migration background according to official criteria. Rather, the subjective perceptions of one's own attribution as a migrant seem more suitable as indicators of discrimination and should be taken into account in future research or surveys on experiences of discrimination.

分享
查看原文
[移民背景的客观和主观归因与感知到的歧视和种族主义之间的联系]。
背景:从社会科学和方法论等角度来看,德国普遍采用的以标准为导向的移民人口评估方法目前正受到批评。方法:根据柏林市的人口代表性数据集(N=1,989),除了对移民背景的客观评估外,还记录了基于移民背景的自我归因和预期外部归因对移民背景的主观认知。此外,还评估了社会人口特征、特定移民特征以及感知到的歧视。利用描述性和推论性统计方法,分析了对移民背景的客观和主观评估之间的差异及其与所感受到的歧视之间的关系:在采用标准导向法确定为具有移民背景的受访者中,不到一半(38%,154/400)的受访者称自己为移民。36%的受访者(144/405)表示,他们认为德国的其他人将他们描述为具有移民背景的人。与没有移民背景的受访者相比,有移民背景的受访者遭受基于肤色、宗教或原籍国的歧视的可能性要大得多。此外,研究还发现,自我归因和预期他人归因为移民与遭受歧视和种族主义的经历呈正相关:讨论:研究结果表明,对移民问题有敏感认识的研究不应简单地按照官方标准来区分有移民背景和无移民背景的人。相反,将自己归因于移民的主观感受作为歧视指标似乎更为合适,在今后有关歧视经历的研究或调查中应加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信