[Frequency Of Psychological Stress And Barriers To Accessing Mental Health Services For Leipzig Citizens Of Afghan And Iraqi Citizenship].

IF 0.7 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Klara Koch, Yuriy Nesterko, Kim Hella Schönenberg, Heide Glaesmer
{"title":"[Frequency Of Psychological Stress And Barriers To Accessing Mental Health Services For Leipzig Citizens Of Afghan And Iraqi Citizenship].","authors":"Klara Koch, Yuriy Nesterko, Kim Hella Schönenberg, Heide Glaesmer","doi":"10.1055/a-2311-4717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Aim of the study was to report evidence on mental health needs and access to mental health and psychosocial support for Leipzig citizens of Afghan and Iraqi citizenship in the presence of mental stress and, above all, to identify barriers to access to care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All adults in Leipzig with Iraqi or Afghan citizenship, who were not born in Germany were contacted. Various instruments (PHQ-9, GAD-7, SSS-8, PCL-5/LEC-5) to screen for symptoms of depression, anxiety, somatization disorder or PTSD and one item for self-reported emotional problems were used. Questions on health care utilization and barriers to care followed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>51.4% screened positive in at least one of the tests and self-reported emotional problems. 38.2% of those in need of treatment did not seek help. Frequent reasons for not seeking help were, that the people wanted to solve the problem on their own or that the problem did not bother them very much. A lack of trust and understanding regarding the healthcare system and fear of discrimination and stigmatisation were also perceived as additional barriers to care.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The study revealed a high percentage of mental health needs. This could be due to the high number of traumatic events and post-migration stressors. A longer period of residence in Germany and easier access to the public health system through the health insurance card could have encouraged the health care utilization. The treatment gap was caused by barriers to care such as a lack of knowledge or trust of the German health care system and fear of stigmatisation and discrimination.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More information about access to care structures and more low-threshold services need to be implemented. These should be organised on an interdisciplinary basis and focus on culturally and racially sensitive care. Mental health awareness should be strengthened and under no circumstances should the access to care be restricted any further.</p>","PeriodicalId":47315,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2311-4717","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Aim of the study was to report evidence on mental health needs and access to mental health and psychosocial support for Leipzig citizens of Afghan and Iraqi citizenship in the presence of mental stress and, above all, to identify barriers to access to care.

Methods: All adults in Leipzig with Iraqi or Afghan citizenship, who were not born in Germany were contacted. Various instruments (PHQ-9, GAD-7, SSS-8, PCL-5/LEC-5) to screen for symptoms of depression, anxiety, somatization disorder or PTSD and one item for self-reported emotional problems were used. Questions on health care utilization and barriers to care followed.

Results: 51.4% screened positive in at least one of the tests and self-reported emotional problems. 38.2% of those in need of treatment did not seek help. Frequent reasons for not seeking help were, that the people wanted to solve the problem on their own or that the problem did not bother them very much. A lack of trust and understanding regarding the healthcare system and fear of discrimination and stigmatisation were also perceived as additional barriers to care.

Discussion: The study revealed a high percentage of mental health needs. This could be due to the high number of traumatic events and post-migration stressors. A longer period of residence in Germany and easier access to the public health system through the health insurance card could have encouraged the health care utilization. The treatment gap was caused by barriers to care such as a lack of knowledge or trust of the German health care system and fear of stigmatisation and discrimination.

Conclusion: More information about access to care structures and more low-threshold services need to be implemented. These should be organised on an interdisciplinary basis and focus on culturally and racially sensitive care. Mental health awareness should be strengthened and under no circumstances should the access to care be restricted any further.

[阿富汗和伊拉克籍莱比锡公民的心理压力频率和获得心理健康服务的障碍]。
研究目的本研究旨在报告阿富汗和伊拉克籍莱比锡市民在精神压力下的心理健康需求以及获得心理健康和社会心理支持的情况,尤其是确定获得护理的障碍:方法:联系了莱比锡所有拥有伊拉克或阿富汗国籍的非德国出生的成年人。调查使用了多种工具(PHQ-9、GAD-7、SSS-8、PCL-5/LEC-5)来筛查抑郁症、焦虑症、躯体化障碍或创伤后应激障碍的症状,并使用了一个自我报告情绪问题的项目。随后还就医疗保健的使用情况和障碍进行了提问:51.4%的人在至少一项测试和自我报告的情绪问题中呈阳性。38.2%需要治疗的人没有寻求帮助。不寻求帮助的常见原因是,他们想自己解决问题,或者问题并没有给他们造成太大困扰。对医疗系统缺乏信任和了解,害怕受到歧视和侮辱,也被认为是接受治疗的额外障碍:研究显示,有精神健康需求的人比例很高。这可能是由于大量的创伤事件和移民后的压力造成的。在德国居住的时间越长,通过医疗保险卡更容易进入公共医疗系统,这可能会促进医疗服务的使用。治疗差距是由医疗障碍造成的,例如缺乏对德国医疗系统的了解或信任,以及害怕受到侮辱和歧视:结论:需要提供更多关于医疗机构和低门槛服务的信息。这些服务应在跨学科的基础上进行组织,并侧重于文化和种族敏感性护理。应加强心理健康意识,在任何情况下都不应进一步限制获得护理的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
89
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信