Investigating the impact of exercise type combined with caloric restriction on quality of life–The PRONAF study

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Domingo Jesús Ramos-Campo, Miguel Ángel Rojo-Tirado, Pedro J. Benito-Peinado
{"title":"Investigating the impact of exercise type combined with caloric restriction on quality of life–The PRONAF study","authors":"Domingo Jesús Ramos-Campo,&nbsp;Miguel Ángel Rojo-Tirado,&nbsp;Pedro J. Benito-Peinado","doi":"10.1016/j.physbeh.2024.114614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of endurance training (E), strength training (S), or combined training (SE), along with caloric restriction diet, compared to only diet and physical activity recommendations (C, control), on the quality of life in individuals with obesity. One hundred and twenty obese participants (61 males), aged 18–50 years, were randomly assigned to the different experimental groups, with ninety-six completing the study. The intervention period spanned 22 weeks (3 times per week). All subjects followed a hypocaloric diet, and quality of life was assessed using the SF36 questionnaire before and after the training program. A significant improvement was observed in emotional role following the S (Baseline: 85.06 ± 30.32; Post: 96.00 ± 11.06; <em>p</em> = 0.030) and SE (Baseline: 76.67 ± 35.18; Post: 91.30 ± 22.96; <em>p</em> = 0.010) programs, but not after E (Baseline: 83.33 ± 29.40; Post: 78.26 ± 35.69; <em>p</em> = 0.318) and C (Baseline: 77.01 ± 34.62; Post: 79.37 ± 37.23; <em>p</em> = 0.516). No significant main effect was observed in any other outcome measured. Overall, all groups demonstrated improvements in quality-of-life outcomes. In conclusion, any physical exercise intervention combined with caloric restriction, physical activity recommendations, and nutritional habits resulted in an enhancement of quality of life.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031938424001598/pdfft?md5=a3e4164f09ea6da470d87d93d74c3e8c&pid=1-s2.0-S0031938424001598-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031938424001598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of endurance training (E), strength training (S), or combined training (SE), along with caloric restriction diet, compared to only diet and physical activity recommendations (C, control), on the quality of life in individuals with obesity. One hundred and twenty obese participants (61 males), aged 18–50 years, were randomly assigned to the different experimental groups, with ninety-six completing the study. The intervention period spanned 22 weeks (3 times per week). All subjects followed a hypocaloric diet, and quality of life was assessed using the SF36 questionnaire before and after the training program. A significant improvement was observed in emotional role following the S (Baseline: 85.06 ± 30.32; Post: 96.00 ± 11.06; p = 0.030) and SE (Baseline: 76.67 ± 35.18; Post: 91.30 ± 22.96; p = 0.010) programs, but not after E (Baseline: 83.33 ± 29.40; Post: 78.26 ± 35.69; p = 0.318) and C (Baseline: 77.01 ± 34.62; Post: 79.37 ± 37.23; p = 0.516). No significant main effect was observed in any other outcome measured. Overall, all groups demonstrated improvements in quality-of-life outcomes. In conclusion, any physical exercise intervention combined with caloric restriction, physical activity recommendations, and nutritional habits resulted in an enhancement of quality of life.

调查运动类型结合热量限制对生活质量的影响--PRONAF 研究。
本研究旨在分析耐力训练(E)、力量训练(S)或综合训练(SE)以及热量限制饮食对肥胖症患者生活质量的影响,并与只推荐饮食和体育锻炼(C,对照组)进行比较。120 名年龄在 18-50 岁之间的肥胖参与者(61 名男性)被随机分配到不同的实验组,其中 96 人完成了研究。干预期为 22 周(每周 3 次)。所有受试者都遵循低热量饮食,并在训练计划前后使用 SF36 问卷对生活质量进行了评估。在 S(基线:85.06 ± 30.32;后期:96.00 ± 11.06;p=0.030)和 SE(基线:76.67 ± 35.18;后期:91.00 ± 22.96;p=0.030)训练后,受试者的情绪角色得到了明显改善。30±22.96;p=0.010)项目,但在 E(基线:83.33±29.40;后期:78.26±35.69;p=0.318)和 C(基线:77.01±34.62;后期:79.37±37.23;p=0.516)项目后则没有。在其他测量结果中均未观察到明显的主效应。总体而言,所有小组的生活质量都有所改善。总之,任何体育锻炼干预与热量限制、体育锻炼建议和营养习惯相结合,都能提高生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信