Classification of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease Using Manual Motor Measures.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurodegenerative Diseases Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1159/000539800
Vincent Koppelmans, Marit F L Ruitenberg, Sydney Y Schaefer, Jace B King, Jasmine M Jacobo, Benjamin P Silvester, Amanda F Mejia, Jos van der Geest, John M Hoffman, Tolga Tasdizen, Kevin Duff
{"title":"Classification of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease Using Manual Motor Measures.","authors":"Vincent Koppelmans, Marit F L Ruitenberg, Sydney Y Schaefer, Jace B King, Jasmine M Jacobo, Benjamin P Silvester, Amanda F Mejia, Jos van der Geest, John M Hoffman, Tolga Tasdizen, Kevin Duff","doi":"10.1159/000539800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Manual motor problems have been reported in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD), but the specific aspects that are affected, their neuropathology, and potential value for classification modeling is unknown. The current study examined if multiple measures of motor strength, dexterity, and speed are affected in MCI and AD, related to AD biomarkers, and are able to classify MCI or AD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-three cognitively normal (CN), 33 amnestic MCI, and 28 AD subjects completed five manual motor measures: grip force, Trail Making Test A, spiral tracing, finger tapping, and a simulated feeding task. Analyses included (1) group differences in manual performance; (2) associations between manual function and AD biomarkers (PET amyloid β, hippocampal volume, and APOE ε4 alleles); and (3) group classification accuracy of manual motor function using machine learning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Amnestic MCI and AD subjects exhibited slower psychomotor speed and AD subjects had weaker dominant hand grip strength than CN subjects. Performance on these measures was related to amyloid β deposition (both) and hippocampal volume (psychomotor speed only). Support vector classification well-discriminated control and AD subjects (area under the curve of 0.73 and 0.77, respectively) but poorly discriminated MCI from controls or AD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Grip strength and spiral tracing appear preserved, while psychomotor speed is affected in amnestic MCI and AD. The association of motor performance with amyloid β deposition and atrophy could indicate that this is due to amyloid deposition in and atrophy of motor brain regions, which generally occurs later in the disease process. The promising discriminatory abilities of manual motor measures for AD emphasize their value alongside other cognitive and motor assessment outcomes in classification and prediction models, as well as potential enrichment of outcome variables in AD clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":19115,"journal":{"name":"Neurodegenerative Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11381162/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurodegenerative Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539800","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Manual motor problems have been reported in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD), but the specific aspects that are affected, their neuropathology, and potential value for classification modeling is unknown. The current study examined if multiple measures of motor strength, dexterity, and speed are affected in MCI and AD, related to AD biomarkers, and are able to classify MCI or AD.

Methods: Fifty-three cognitively normal (CN), 33 amnestic MCI, and 28 AD subjects completed five manual motor measures: grip force, Trail Making Test A, spiral tracing, finger tapping, and a simulated feeding task. Analyses included (1) group differences in manual performance; (2) associations between manual function and AD biomarkers (PET amyloid β, hippocampal volume, and APOE ε4 alleles); and (3) group classification accuracy of manual motor function using machine learning.

Results: Amnestic MCI and AD subjects exhibited slower psychomotor speed and AD subjects had weaker dominant hand grip strength than CN subjects. Performance on these measures was related to amyloid β deposition (both) and hippocampal volume (psychomotor speed only). Support vector classification well-discriminated control and AD subjects (area under the curve of 0.73 and 0.77, respectively) but poorly discriminated MCI from controls or AD.

Conclusion: Grip strength and spiral tracing appear preserved, while psychomotor speed is affected in amnestic MCI and AD. The association of motor performance with amyloid β deposition and atrophy could indicate that this is due to amyloid deposition in and atrophy of motor brain regions, which generally occurs later in the disease process. The promising discriminatory abilities of manual motor measures for AD emphasize their value alongside other cognitive and motor assessment outcomes in classification and prediction models, as well as potential enrichment of outcome variables in AD clinical trials.

利用手动运动测量对轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病进行分类。
导言据报道,轻度认知障碍(MCI)和阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者存在手动运动问题,但具体受影响的方面、其神经病理学以及对分类建模的潜在价值尚不清楚。本研究考察了运动力量、灵活性和速度的多种测量指标在 MCI 和 AD 中是否受到影响,是否与 AD 生物标志物相关,以及是否能对 MCI 或 AD 进行分类:方法: 53名认知正常(CN)、33名有失忆症的MCI和28名AD受试者完成了五项徒手运动测量:握力、追踪测试A、螺旋追踪、手指敲击和模拟进食任务。分析包括结果显示:失智型 MCI 和 AD 受试者的精神运动速度较慢,AD 受试者的优势手握力弱于 CN 受试者。这些指标的表现与淀粉样β沉积(两者)和海马体积(仅精神运动速度)有关。支持向量分类法能很好地区分对照组和AD组受试者(曲线下面积分别为0.73和0.77),但不能很好地区分MCI和对照组或AD组:结论:在失忆性 MCI 和 AD 患者中,握力和螺旋追踪似乎得到了保留,而精神运动速度则受到了影响。运动表现与淀粉样蛋白β沉积和萎缩有关,这可能是由于淀粉样蛋白在运动脑区沉积和萎缩所致,而淀粉样蛋白沉积和萎缩一般发生在疾病过程的后期。针对AD的徒手运动测量具有良好的鉴别能力,强调了它们与其他认知和运动评估结果在分类和预测模型中的价值,以及在AD临床试验中丰富结果变量的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurodegenerative Diseases
Neurodegenerative Diseases 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Neurodegenerative Diseases'' is a bimonthly, multidisciplinary journal for the publication of advances in the understanding of neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer''s disease, Parkinson''s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Huntington''s disease and related neurological and psychiatric disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信