[Acceptance by and evaluation of unidirectional hearing systems by patients in outpatient and (partial) inpatient geriatric psychiatric care].

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Barbara Leicher, Verena Caroline Buschert, Monia Belkahia, Sarah Winter, Norbert Scherbaum, Jens Benninghoff
{"title":"[Acceptance by and evaluation of unidirectional hearing systems by patients in outpatient and (partial) inpatient geriatric psychiatric care].","authors":"Barbara Leicher, Verena Caroline Buschert, Monia Belkahia, Sarah Winter, Norbert Scherbaum, Jens Benninghoff","doi":"10.1055/a-2314-3049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim of study: </strong>The aim of the present study was to investigate the use and subjective benefit of specific temporary hearing-improvement measures (unidirectional hearing aids) in hearing-impaired, geriatric psychiatric patients. Simultaneously, employees evaluated the handling and acceptance of the hearing-improving measures.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>Between October 2022 and July 2023, subjective hearing ability and use of conventional hearing aids were recorded in outpatients and in those in partial inpatient care (n=151) based on a self-assessment questionnaire. After using unidirectional hearing aids in diagnostics and treatment for four to six weeks, the hearing ability of 21 patients who had not used the hearing-improving measures was surveyed again and the experiences of active users (n=34) and employees (n=24) with the hearing-improving measures were analyzed via questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 151 included patients (79.2 years, 62.1% female), 147 patients and 24 employees (79.2% female) took part in the study. Subjective hearing impairments were reported by 50 patients (34.0%). The hearing of 93 patients (63.2%) had already been assessed once. Treatment with conventional hearing aids was recommended for 34 of those surveyed (23.1%). Likewise, 34 patients (23.1%) took advantage of the offer of hearing-improving measures. All 34 users and all participating employees rated the hearing-improving measures used as mostly positive.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hearing impairment in geriatric psychiatric patients is common and often not adequately treated with conventional hearing aids, yet hearing-improving measures are only used to a limited extent. Mostly positive results among the users of hearing-improving measures favor their implementation in patients in routine outpatient and (partial) inpatient geriatric psychiatric care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12353,"journal":{"name":"Fortschritte Der Neurologie Psychiatrie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fortschritte Der Neurologie Psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2314-3049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim of study: The aim of the present study was to investigate the use and subjective benefit of specific temporary hearing-improvement measures (unidirectional hearing aids) in hearing-impaired, geriatric psychiatric patients. Simultaneously, employees evaluated the handling and acceptance of the hearing-improving measures.

Material and method: Between October 2022 and July 2023, subjective hearing ability and use of conventional hearing aids were recorded in outpatients and in those in partial inpatient care (n=151) based on a self-assessment questionnaire. After using unidirectional hearing aids in diagnostics and treatment for four to six weeks, the hearing ability of 21 patients who had not used the hearing-improving measures was surveyed again and the experiences of active users (n=34) and employees (n=24) with the hearing-improving measures were analyzed via questionnaires.

Results: Of the 151 included patients (79.2 years, 62.1% female), 147 patients and 24 employees (79.2% female) took part in the study. Subjective hearing impairments were reported by 50 patients (34.0%). The hearing of 93 patients (63.2%) had already been assessed once. Treatment with conventional hearing aids was recommended for 34 of those surveyed (23.1%). Likewise, 34 patients (23.1%) took advantage of the offer of hearing-improving measures. All 34 users and all participating employees rated the hearing-improving measures used as mostly positive.

Conclusion: Hearing impairment in geriatric psychiatric patients is common and often not adequately treated with conventional hearing aids, yet hearing-improving measures are only used to a limited extent. Mostly positive results among the users of hearing-improving measures favor their implementation in patients in routine outpatient and (partial) inpatient geriatric psychiatric care.

[老年精神病门诊和(部分)住院患者对单向听力系统的接受程度和评估]。
研究目的本研究旨在调查特定临时听力改善措施(单向助听器)在听力受损的老年精神病患者中的使用情况和主观益处。同时,员工还对听力改善措施的操作和接受程度进行了评估:在 2022 年 10 月至 2023 年 7 月期间,根据自我评估问卷记录了门诊病人和部分住院病人(151 人)的主观听力能力和传统助听器的使用情况。在诊断和治疗中使用单向助听器四至六周后,再次调查了21名未使用过听力改善措施的患者的听力能力,并通过问卷调查分析了积极使用者(人数=34)和雇员(人数=24)使用听力改善措施的经验:在纳入的 151 名患者(79.2 岁,62.1% 为女性)中,有 147 名患者和 24 名员工(79.2% 为女性)参加了研究。50名患者(34.0%)报告了主观听力障碍。93名患者(63.2%)的听力已接受过一次评估。在接受调查的患者中,有 34 人(23.1%)被建议使用传统助听器进行治疗。同样,有 34 名患者(23.1%)接受了听力改善措施。所有 34 名使用者和所有参与调查的员工都对所使用的听力改善措施给予了积极的评价:结论:老年精神病患者的听力损伤很常见,传统助听器往往无法充分治疗,但听力改善措施的使用范围有限。听力改善措施的使用者大多对结果表示肯定,这有利于在老年精神病患者的常规门诊和(部分)住院治疗中使用这些措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
139
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Fundiertes Wissen für den Berufsalltag Relevante Originalarbeiten Informative Übersichten zu wichtigen Themen Fortbildungsteil mit Zertifizierung – 36 CME-Punkte pro Jahr Interessante Kasuistiken Referiert & kommentiert: Internationale Studien Aktuelles zu Begutachtung und Neurobiologie International gelistet und häufig zitiert
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信