Effects of popliteal nerve blocks on postoperative pain management in fibula-free flap patients for head and neck cancer reconstruction

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Amanda Gemmiti MD, Jason Audlin MD, Nadia Debick BS MPH, Heidi Proper BS, Prabhat Yeturu MD, Ronald Walsh NP, Jesse Ryan MD, Susan Samudre MD
{"title":"Effects of popliteal nerve blocks on postoperative pain management in fibula-free flap patients for head and neck cancer reconstruction","authors":"Amanda Gemmiti MD,&nbsp;Jason Audlin MD,&nbsp;Nadia Debick BS MPH,&nbsp;Heidi Proper BS,&nbsp;Prabhat Yeturu MD,&nbsp;Ronald Walsh NP,&nbsp;Jesse Ryan MD,&nbsp;Susan Samudre MD","doi":"10.1002/lio2.1290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To determine if performing popliteal nerve blocks preoperatively in patients undergoing fibula-free flap surgery for head and neck cancer reconstruction decreases subjective pain scores decreases narcotic usage, and improves mobility in the acute postoperative time period when compared to alternative pain control regimens.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective review of the medical records of patients who underwent fibula-free flap reconstruction for head and neck malignancy at SUNY Upstate Medical University during the time period from 2015 to 2022 was performed. Collected data consisted of patient demographics and clinical characteristics, postoperative pain management modalities, reported pain scores, postoperative narcotic usage, length of hospital stay, and days until out of bed without personal assistance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 40 patients were included in the study. The average reported pain score was reduced in the nerve block group compared to the control group (1.7 vs. 4.0, <i>p</i>-value = .003). Similarly, the average maximum reported pain score was also lower in patients who received a nerve block (3.4 vs. 6.9, <i>p</i>-value = .002). None of the patients who received popliteal nerve blocks required pain control with parenteral narcotics postoperatively, whereas 82.9% of patients without a nerve block did. Patients who received a popliteal nerve block consumed an average of 103.5 MME, whereas those who did not receive a block consumed an average of 523.0 MME. No statistically significant difference was found between the groups regarding time from surgery until transfer without personal assistance or length of hospital stay.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Popliteal nerve blocks can reduce postoperative pain in patients undergoing fibula-free flap reconstruction for head and neck cancer.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48529,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lio2.1290","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.1290","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To determine if performing popliteal nerve blocks preoperatively in patients undergoing fibula-free flap surgery for head and neck cancer reconstruction decreases subjective pain scores decreases narcotic usage, and improves mobility in the acute postoperative time period when compared to alternative pain control regimens.

Methods

A retrospective review of the medical records of patients who underwent fibula-free flap reconstruction for head and neck malignancy at SUNY Upstate Medical University during the time period from 2015 to 2022 was performed. Collected data consisted of patient demographics and clinical characteristics, postoperative pain management modalities, reported pain scores, postoperative narcotic usage, length of hospital stay, and days until out of bed without personal assistance.

Results

A total of 40 patients were included in the study. The average reported pain score was reduced in the nerve block group compared to the control group (1.7 vs. 4.0, p-value = .003). Similarly, the average maximum reported pain score was also lower in patients who received a nerve block (3.4 vs. 6.9, p-value = .002). None of the patients who received popliteal nerve blocks required pain control with parenteral narcotics postoperatively, whereas 82.9% of patients without a nerve block did. Patients who received a popliteal nerve block consumed an average of 103.5 MME, whereas those who did not receive a block consumed an average of 523.0 MME. No statistically significant difference was found between the groups regarding time from surgery until transfer without personal assistance or length of hospital stay.

Conclusion

Popliteal nerve blocks can reduce postoperative pain in patients undergoing fibula-free flap reconstruction for head and neck cancer.

腘绳神经阻滞对头颈部癌症重建无腓骨皮瓣患者术后疼痛控制的影响
目的 确定与其他止痛方案相比,对接受头颈部恶性肿瘤无纤维皮瓣重建手术的患者在术前进行腘神经阻滞是否能降低主观疼痛评分、减少麻醉药物的使用并改善术后急性期的活动能力。 方法 对纽约州立大学上州医科大学 2015 年至 2022 年期间接受头颈部恶性肿瘤无纤维皮瓣重建术的患者病历进行回顾性研究。收集的数据包括患者的人口统计学特征和临床特征、术后疼痛治疗方式、疼痛评分报告、术后麻醉剂使用情况、住院时间以及无需个人协助下床活动的天数。 结果 共有 40 名患者参与了研究。与对照组相比,神经阻滞组的平均疼痛评分降低了(1.7 对 4.0,P 值 = .003)。同样,接受神经阻滞治疗的患者的平均最大疼痛评分也较低(3.4 对 6.9,p 值 = .002)。接受腘绳肌神经阻滞的患者术后无一需要使用肠外麻醉剂控制疼痛,而未接受神经阻滞的患者中有 82.9% 需要使用肠外麻醉剂。接受腘神经阻滞的患者平均消耗了 103.5 兆焦耳,而未接受阻滞的患者平均消耗了 523.0 兆焦耳。两组患者从手术到无专人协助转运的时间或住院时间在统计学上没有明显差异。 结论 腘神经阻滞可以减轻头颈部癌症无腓骨皮瓣重建术患者的术后疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信