Organizing visions for data-centric management: how Norwegian policy documents construe the use of data in health organizations.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Mads Solberg, Ralf Kirchhoff, Jannike Dyb Oksavik, Lauri Wessel
{"title":"Organizing visions for data-centric management: how Norwegian policy documents construe the use of data in health organizations.","authors":"Mads Solberg, Ralf Kirchhoff, Jannike Dyb Oksavik, Lauri Wessel","doi":"10.1108/JHOM-12-2023-0378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Norway, like other welfare states, seeks to leverage data to transform its pressured public healthcare system. While managers will be central to doing so, we lack knowledge about how specifically they would do so and what constraints and expectations they operate under. Public sources, like the Norwegian policy documents investigated here, provide important backdrops against which such managerial work emerges. This article therefore aims to analyze how key Norwegian policy documents construe data use in health management.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>We analyzed five notable policy documents using a \"practice-oriented\" framework, considering these as arenas for \"organizing visions\" (OVs) about managerial use of data in healthcare organizations. This framework considers documents as not just texts that comment on a topic but as discursive tools that formulate, negotiate and shape issues of national importance, such as expectations about data use in health management.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The OVs we identify anticipate a bold future for health management, where data use is supported through interconnected information systems that provide relevant information on demand. These OVs are similar to discourse on \"evidence-based management,\" but differ in important ways. Managers are consistently framed as key stakeholders that can benefit from using secondary data, but this requires better data integration across the health system. Despite forward-looking OVs, we find considerable ambiguity regarding the practical, social and epistemic dimensions of data use in health management. Our analysis calls for a reframing, by moving away from the hype of \"data-driven\" health management toward an empirically-oriented, \"data-centric\" approach that recognizes the situated and relational nature of managerial work on secondary data.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>By exploring OVs in the Norwegian health policy landscape, this study adds to our growing understanding of expectations towards healthcare managers' use of data. Given Norway's highly digitized health system, our analysis has relevance for health services in other countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":47447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Organization and Management","volume":"ahead-of-print ahead-of-print","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Organization and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-12-2023-0378","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Norway, like other welfare states, seeks to leverage data to transform its pressured public healthcare system. While managers will be central to doing so, we lack knowledge about how specifically they would do so and what constraints and expectations they operate under. Public sources, like the Norwegian policy documents investigated here, provide important backdrops against which such managerial work emerges. This article therefore aims to analyze how key Norwegian policy documents construe data use in health management.

Design/methodology/approach: We analyzed five notable policy documents using a "practice-oriented" framework, considering these as arenas for "organizing visions" (OVs) about managerial use of data in healthcare organizations. This framework considers documents as not just texts that comment on a topic but as discursive tools that formulate, negotiate and shape issues of national importance, such as expectations about data use in health management.

Findings: The OVs we identify anticipate a bold future for health management, where data use is supported through interconnected information systems that provide relevant information on demand. These OVs are similar to discourse on "evidence-based management," but differ in important ways. Managers are consistently framed as key stakeholders that can benefit from using secondary data, but this requires better data integration across the health system. Despite forward-looking OVs, we find considerable ambiguity regarding the practical, social and epistemic dimensions of data use in health management. Our analysis calls for a reframing, by moving away from the hype of "data-driven" health management toward an empirically-oriented, "data-centric" approach that recognizes the situated and relational nature of managerial work on secondary data.

Originality/value: By exploring OVs in the Norwegian health policy landscape, this study adds to our growing understanding of expectations towards healthcare managers' use of data. Given Norway's highly digitized health system, our analysis has relevance for health services in other countries.

组织以数据为中心的管理愿景:挪威的政策文件如何解释卫生组织中的数据使用。
目的:与其他福利国家一样,挪威试图利用数据来改造其压力巨大的公共医疗保健系统。虽然管理者在其中发挥着核心作用,但我们却不了解他们将如何具体开展工作,以及他们在工作中受到哪些限制和期望。公开资料,如本文调查的挪威政策文件,为此类管理工作的开展提供了重要背景。因此,本文旨在分析挪威的主要政策文件是如何解释卫生管理中的数据使用问题的:我们采用 "以实践为导向 "的框架对五份重要政策文件进行了分析,将这些文件视为医疗机构中数据管理使用的 "组织愿景"(OVs)的舞台。该框架认为,文件不仅仅是评论某个主题的文本,而且是制定、协商和塑造国家重要问题(如在医疗管理中使用数据的预期)的话语工具:我们所确定的开放式志愿服务为卫生管理预见了一个大胆的未来,在这个未来中,数据的使用将通过相互连接的信息系统得到支持,这些系统将根据需求提供相关信息。这些愿景与有关 "循证管理 "的讨论相似,但在一些重要方面有所不同。管理者一直被认为是关键的利益相关者,可以从使用二手数据中获益,但这需要整个卫生系统更好地整合数据。尽管OV具有前瞻性,但我们发现在卫生管理中数据使用的实践、社会和认识层面存在相当大的模糊性。我们的分析呼吁进行重新规划,从 "数据驱动 "的健康管理的炒作转向以经验为导向、"以数据为中心 "的方法,承认二级数据管理工作的情景和关系性质:本研究通过探讨挪威卫生政策环境中的OV,进一步加深了我们对医疗管理人员使用数据的期望的理解。鉴于挪威医疗系统的高度数字化,我们的分析对其他国家的医疗服务也有借鉴意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: ■International health and international organizations ■Organisational behaviour, governance, management and leadership ■The inter-relationship of health and public sector services ■Theories and practices of management and leadership in health and related organizations ■Emotion in health care organizations ■Management education and training ■Industrial relations and human resource theory and management. As the demands on the health care industry both polarize and intensify, effective management of financial and human resources, the restructuring of organizations and the handling of market forces are increasingly important areas for the industry to address.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信