The Safety and Efficacy of Hydroxyapatite Repair of Cholesteatoma Skull Base Defects.

IF 1.8 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
OTO Open Pub Date : 2024-06-11 eCollection Date: 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1002/oto2.151
Rema Shah, Allison Reeder, Sarah G Wilkins, John Kveton, Nofrat Schwartz
{"title":"The Safety and Efficacy of Hydroxyapatite Repair of Cholesteatoma Skull Base Defects.","authors":"Rema Shah, Allison Reeder, Sarah G Wilkins, John Kveton, Nofrat Schwartz","doi":"10.1002/oto2.151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the possibility of hydroxyapatite as a safe and effective alternative to currently used bioavailable materials for repair of tegmen defects and labyrinthine fistulas in the setting of cholesteatoma.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary-level-care hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic medical records of patients 18+ years undergoing cholesteatoma-removal surgery between 2013 and 2022 were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two patients diagnosed with cholesteatoma who underwent repair of either a tegmen defect or labyrinthine fistula using hydroxyapatite were evaluated. There were 17 canal wall up (CWU) and 5 canal wall down (CWD) surgeries. The cholesteatoma recidivism rate was 18.2% (n = 4) and the recurrence rate was 4.5% (n = 1). To ensure that these rates were similar to cholesteatoma-removal surgeries in which hydroxyapatite was not used, a 22 age, gender, and operative technique-matched cohort was evaluated. For patients with CWU surgeries, the rate of recurrence and recidivism were identical between both cohorts (0% and 23.5%, respectively; <i>P</i> = 1 for both). While in CWD surgeries, there was a nonstatistically significant difference in the recurrence as there was only 1 patient with recurrence in the hydroxyapatite group (<i>P</i> = 1). Three (13.5%) patients in the hydroxyapatite group had a local infection and 1 (4.5%) had a subacute mastoid infection. All patients with semicircular canal fistulas had consistent bone lines on postoperative audiograms, with no worsening sensorineural hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our cohort, hydroxyapatite was safe and successful in repairing skull base defects and inner-ear fistulas in the setting of cholesteatoma with a low rate of postoperative infection and no evidence of a higher rate of cholesteatoma recurrence. Further studies are needed to assess population generalizability.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"8 2","pages":"e151"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11165677/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTO Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the possibility of hydroxyapatite as a safe and effective alternative to currently used bioavailable materials for repair of tegmen defects and labyrinthine fistulas in the setting of cholesteatoma.

Study design: Retrospective study.

Setting: Tertiary-level-care hospital.

Methods: Electronic medical records of patients 18+ years undergoing cholesteatoma-removal surgery between 2013 and 2022 were reviewed.

Results: Twenty-two patients diagnosed with cholesteatoma who underwent repair of either a tegmen defect or labyrinthine fistula using hydroxyapatite were evaluated. There were 17 canal wall up (CWU) and 5 canal wall down (CWD) surgeries. The cholesteatoma recidivism rate was 18.2% (n = 4) and the recurrence rate was 4.5% (n = 1). To ensure that these rates were similar to cholesteatoma-removal surgeries in which hydroxyapatite was not used, a 22 age, gender, and operative technique-matched cohort was evaluated. For patients with CWU surgeries, the rate of recurrence and recidivism were identical between both cohorts (0% and 23.5%, respectively; P = 1 for both). While in CWD surgeries, there was a nonstatistically significant difference in the recurrence as there was only 1 patient with recurrence in the hydroxyapatite group (P = 1). Three (13.5%) patients in the hydroxyapatite group had a local infection and 1 (4.5%) had a subacute mastoid infection. All patients with semicircular canal fistulas had consistent bone lines on postoperative audiograms, with no worsening sensorineural hearing loss.

Conclusion: In our cohort, hydroxyapatite was safe and successful in repairing skull base defects and inner-ear fistulas in the setting of cholesteatoma with a low rate of postoperative infection and no evidence of a higher rate of cholesteatoma recurrence. Further studies are needed to assess population generalizability.

羟基磷灰石修复胆脂瘤颅底缺损的安全性和有效性
目的研究设计:回顾性研究:研究设计:回顾性研究:研究设计:回顾性研究:方法:查阅2013年至2022年期间接受胆脂瘤切除手术的18岁以上患者的电子病历:评估了22名被诊断为胆脂瘤的患者,他们接受了使用羟基磷灰石修复耳门缺损或迷宫瘘的手术。其中 17 例为管壁向上(CWU)手术,5 例为管壁向下(CWD)手术。胆脂瘤复发率为 18.2%(4 例),复发率为 4.5%(1 例)。为了确保这些复发率与未使用羟基磷灰石的胆脂瘤切除手术相似,我们对22个年龄、性别和手术技术匹配的队列进行了评估。对于接受 CWU 手术的患者,两组患者的复发率和再犯率相同(分别为 0% 和 23.5%;P = 1)。而在 CWD 手术中,羟基磷灰石组仅有一名患者复发(P = 1),因此复发率的差异无统计学意义。羟基磷灰石组有 3 名(13.5%)患者出现局部感染,1 名(4.5%)患者出现亚急性乳突感染。所有半规管瘘管患者术后听力图上的骨线一致,感音神经性听力损失没有恶化:在我们的队列中,羟基磷灰石在修复胆脂瘤颅底缺损和内耳瘘管方面是安全和成功的,术后感染率较低,没有证据表明胆脂瘤复发率较高。还需要进一步的研究来评估人群的普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
OTO Open
OTO Open Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信