Reappraising imaging features of pancreatic acinar cystic transformation: be aware of differential diagnoses.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
European Radiology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-11 DOI:10.1007/s00330-024-10823-3
Lina Aguilera Munoz, Carina Boros, Fanny Bonvalet, Louis de Mestier, Frédérique Maire, Philippe Lévy, Jérôme Cros, Maxime Ronot, Vinciane Rebours
{"title":"Reappraising imaging features of pancreatic acinar cystic transformation: be aware of differential diagnoses.","authors":"Lina Aguilera Munoz, Carina Boros, Fanny Bonvalet, Louis de Mestier, Frédérique Maire, Philippe Lévy, Jérôme Cros, Maxime Ronot, Vinciane Rebours","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-10823-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Imaging features of pancreatic acinar cystic transformation (ACT) have been published. We aimed to describe the clinical and radiological characteristics of patients with a presumed pancreatic ACT diagnosis, reappraising the value of these published imaging criteria.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Single-center retrospective study (2003-2021) of consecutive patients with a presumed diagnosis of ACT as suggested by the local expert multidisciplinary case review board. Patients without available imaging (CT or MRI) for review were excluded. Patients were classified into \"certain\" ACT (if ≥ 2 imaging criteria and no differential diagnosis) or \"uncertain\" ACT (if ≥ 1 imaging criteria and suggested differential diagnoses).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-four patients (35 males, [55%]) were included. ACT was considered \"certain\" for 34 patients (53%) and \"uncertain\" for 30 patients (47%). The number of ACT criteria did not differ between groups, with 91.2% of patients with ≥ 3 ACT imaging criteria in the \"certain\" group vs 93.3% in the \"uncertain\" group (p = 0.88). In the \"uncertain\" group, the main suggested differentials were branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (18/30 patients, 60%), calcifying chronic pancreatitis (8/30 patients, 27%), both (three patients, 10%) and serous cystadenoma (one patient, 3%). Calcifications were significantly more frequent in the \"uncertain\" group (89% vs 63% in the \"certain\" group, p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Published ACT imaging criteria are frequently associated with features suggesting differential diagnoses. They appear insufficient to reach a final diagnosis in a subset of patients.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance statement: </strong>ACT displays a heterogeneous morphological imaging presentation challenging the non-invasive diagnostic work-up. Physicians' and radiologists' awareness of this entity is important to better understand its natural history and improve non-invasive diagnostic criteria.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>The criteria to help diagnose ACT are frequently associated with features suggestive of differentials. The main alternatives suggested when ACT diagnosis was \"uncertain\" were branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and calcifying chronic pancreatitis. Published ACT diagnostic imaging criteria can be insufficient for a definite non-invasive diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"7650-7658"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10823-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Imaging features of pancreatic acinar cystic transformation (ACT) have been published. We aimed to describe the clinical and radiological characteristics of patients with a presumed pancreatic ACT diagnosis, reappraising the value of these published imaging criteria.

Materials and methods: Single-center retrospective study (2003-2021) of consecutive patients with a presumed diagnosis of ACT as suggested by the local expert multidisciplinary case review board. Patients without available imaging (CT or MRI) for review were excluded. Patients were classified into "certain" ACT (if ≥ 2 imaging criteria and no differential diagnosis) or "uncertain" ACT (if ≥ 1 imaging criteria and suggested differential diagnoses).

Results: Sixty-four patients (35 males, [55%]) were included. ACT was considered "certain" for 34 patients (53%) and "uncertain" for 30 patients (47%). The number of ACT criteria did not differ between groups, with 91.2% of patients with ≥ 3 ACT imaging criteria in the "certain" group vs 93.3% in the "uncertain" group (p = 0.88). In the "uncertain" group, the main suggested differentials were branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (18/30 patients, 60%), calcifying chronic pancreatitis (8/30 patients, 27%), both (three patients, 10%) and serous cystadenoma (one patient, 3%). Calcifications were significantly more frequent in the "uncertain" group (89% vs 63% in the "certain" group, p = 0.02).

Conclusion: Published ACT imaging criteria are frequently associated with features suggesting differential diagnoses. They appear insufficient to reach a final diagnosis in a subset of patients.

Clinical relevance statement: ACT displays a heterogeneous morphological imaging presentation challenging the non-invasive diagnostic work-up. Physicians' and radiologists' awareness of this entity is important to better understand its natural history and improve non-invasive diagnostic criteria.

Key points: The criteria to help diagnose ACT are frequently associated with features suggestive of differentials. The main alternatives suggested when ACT diagnosis was "uncertain" were branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and calcifying chronic pancreatitis. Published ACT diagnostic imaging criteria can be insufficient for a definite non-invasive diagnosis.

Abstract Image

重新认识胰腺尖囊肿变的影像特征:注意鉴别诊断。
目的:胰腺尖状囊肿变(ACT)的影像学特征已经公布。我们旨在描述推测诊断为胰腺 ACT 患者的临床和放射学特征,重新评估这些已公布的影像学标准的价值:单中心回顾性研究(2003-2021 年):根据当地多学科专家病例审查委员会的建议,对推测诊断为 ACT 的连续患者进行研究。没有影像学资料(CT 或 MRI)供审查的患者被排除在外。患者被分为 "确定的 "ACT(如果影像学标准≥2项且无鉴别诊断)或 "不确定的 "ACT(如果影像学标准≥1项且建议鉴别诊断):共纳入 64 名患者(35 名男性,[55%])。34名患者(53%)的ACT被认为是 "确定的",30名患者(47%)的ACT被认为是 "不确定的"。各组 ACT 标准的数量没有差异,"确定 "组中有 91.2% 的患者有≥3 项 ACT 影像标准,而 "不确定 "组中有 93.3% 的患者有≥3 项 ACT 影像标准(P = 0.88)。在 "不确定 "组中,建议的主要鉴别指标是分支导管内乳头状粘液瘤(18/30 名患者,60%)、钙化性慢性胰腺炎(8/30 名患者,27%)、两者(3 名患者,10%)和浆液性囊腺瘤(1 名患者,3%)。钙化在 "不确定 "组中的发生率明显更高(89% vs 63%,P = 0.02):结论:已公布的 ACT 成像标准经常与提示鉴别诊断的特征相关。临床相关性声明:临床相关性声明:ACT 的影像学表现具有异质性,这对无创诊断工作提出了挑战。医生和放射科医师对这一实体的认识对于更好地了解其自然史和改进无创诊断标准非常重要:要点:有助于诊断 ACT 的标准往往与提示鉴别的特征相关。当 ACT 诊断 "不确定 "时,建议的主要替代方案是分支导管内乳头状粘液瘤和钙化性慢性胰腺炎。已公布的 ACT 影像诊断标准可能不足以进行明确的非侵入性诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信