Response to von Schmalensee et al.

IF 7.6 1区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY

Ecology Letters Pub Date : 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1111/ele.14436

Guillermo Garcia-Costoya, Claire E. Williams, Trevor M. Faske, Jacob D. Moorman, Michael L. Logan

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Von Schmalensee et al. present two concerns about our study. While the first stems from a general disagreement about our simulation methodology, the second is a useful observation of a modelling choice we made that affected simulation outcomes, but in ways that do not invalidate our original conclusions.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

对 von Schmalensee 等人的回应

Von Schmalensee 等人对我们的研究提出了两个问题。第一个问题源于对我们模拟方法的普遍异议，第二个问题则是对我们所做的建模选择的有益观察，它影响了模拟结果，但并不会使我们最初的结论失效。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Ecology Letters 环境科学-生态学

CiteScore

17.60

自引率

3.40%

发文量

201

审稿时长

1.8 months

期刊介绍： Ecology Letters serves as a platform for the rapid publication of innovative research in ecology. It considers manuscripts across all taxa, biomes, and geographic regions, prioritizing papers that investigate clearly stated hypotheses. The journal publishes concise papers of high originality and general interest, contributing to new developments in ecology. Purely descriptive papers and those that only confirm or extend previous results are discouraged.