{"title":"Local connectedness of boundaries for relatively hyperbolic groups","authors":"Ashani Dasgupta, G. Christopher Hruska","doi":"10.1112/topo.12347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Let <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mi>Γ</mi>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mi>P</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$(\\Gamma,\\mathbb {P})$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> be a relatively hyperbolic group pair that is relatively one ended. Then, the Bowditch boundary of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mi>Γ</mi>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mi>P</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$(\\Gamma,\\mathbb {P})$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> is locally connected. Bowditch previously established this conclusion under the additional assumption that all peripheral subgroups are finitely presented, either one or two ended, and contain no infinite torsion subgroups. We remove these restrictions; we make no restriction on the cardinality of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mi>Γ</mi>\n <annotation>$\\Gamma$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and no restriction on the peripheral subgroups <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>P</mi>\n <mo>∈</mo>\n <mi>P</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$P \\in \\mathbb {P}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1112/topo.12347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Let be a relatively hyperbolic group pair that is relatively one ended. Then, the Bowditch boundary of is locally connected. Bowditch previously established this conclusion under the additional assumption that all peripheral subgroups are finitely presented, either one or two ended, and contain no infinite torsion subgroups. We remove these restrictions; we make no restriction on the cardinality of and no restriction on the peripheral subgroups .