Temperament traits and economic preferences predict occupational choice beyond human capital variables

IF 2.2 2区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Mikko Vaaramo , Sanna Huikari , Leena Ala-Mursula , Jouko Miettunen , Marko Korhonen
{"title":"Temperament traits and economic preferences predict occupational choice beyond human capital variables","authors":"Mikko Vaaramo ,&nbsp;Sanna Huikari ,&nbsp;Leena Ala-Mursula ,&nbsp;Jouko Miettunen ,&nbsp;Marko Korhonen","doi":"10.1016/j.labeco.2024.102576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Standard labor market models have mainly focused on human capital theory, which emphasizes the role of education, experience, and individuals’ different skill levels in determining occupational choice. The recent literature, however, has shown that noncognitive (“soft”) skills are also strong predictors for vocational behavior. Economics provides little guidance on the effects of noncognitive skills on occupational choice. In applied psychology, personality/temperament traits and economic preferences refer to the characteristics explaining how individuals may act differently in similar situations related to occupational choice. We utilize the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 (<em>n</em> = 4,731 to 5,882) to explore the value of incorporating temperament traits and economic preferences in occupational choice. We explore whether temperament traits contribute to occupational choice, using data from the NFBC1966 for the years 2004 to 2012, inclusive. Occupational groups are chosen to be distinct with respect to the requisite skills, education levels, and tasks. The novelty of our data allows us to determine whether temperament traits and economic preferences have significant impacts on occupational choice, while controlling for other variables related to the human capital approach. We find that temperament traits and economic preferences are important contributors of vocational behavior. Our analysis highlights that it is important to jointly explore the effects of the human capital model, noncognitive traits and other nonpecuniary factors in analyzing occupational choices among individuals. We reveal distinct temperament traits for different occupations. To our knowledge, there exists no evidence about how individuals’ temperament traits, economic preferences, and the human capital approach jointly are sorted into occupational choices. In addition, the novelty of our data allows us to include education, among other factors, to control our findings. We find significant differences across occupations regarding temperament traits.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48153,"journal":{"name":"Labour Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092753712400071X/pdfft?md5=fe203434ce7fe538b0e4485378a596bd&pid=1-s2.0-S092753712400071X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labour Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092753712400071X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Standard labor market models have mainly focused on human capital theory, which emphasizes the role of education, experience, and individuals’ different skill levels in determining occupational choice. The recent literature, however, has shown that noncognitive (“soft”) skills are also strong predictors for vocational behavior. Economics provides little guidance on the effects of noncognitive skills on occupational choice. In applied psychology, personality/temperament traits and economic preferences refer to the characteristics explaining how individuals may act differently in similar situations related to occupational choice. We utilize the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 (n = 4,731 to 5,882) to explore the value of incorporating temperament traits and economic preferences in occupational choice. We explore whether temperament traits contribute to occupational choice, using data from the NFBC1966 for the years 2004 to 2012, inclusive. Occupational groups are chosen to be distinct with respect to the requisite skills, education levels, and tasks. The novelty of our data allows us to determine whether temperament traits and economic preferences have significant impacts on occupational choice, while controlling for other variables related to the human capital approach. We find that temperament traits and economic preferences are important contributors of vocational behavior. Our analysis highlights that it is important to jointly explore the effects of the human capital model, noncognitive traits and other nonpecuniary factors in analyzing occupational choices among individuals. We reveal distinct temperament traits for different occupations. To our knowledge, there exists no evidence about how individuals’ temperament traits, economic preferences, and the human capital approach jointly are sorted into occupational choices. In addition, the novelty of our data allows us to include education, among other factors, to control our findings. We find significant differences across occupations regarding temperament traits.

气质特征和经济偏好能预测人力资本变量之外的职业选择
标准的劳动力市场模型主要侧重于人力资本理论,该理论强调教育、经验和个人的不同技能水平在决定职业选择中的作用。然而,最近的文献表明,非认知("软")技能也是职业行为的有力预测因素。在非认知技能对职业选择的影响方面,经济学提供的指导很少。在应用心理学中,人格/气质特征和经济偏好指的是解释个体在与职业选择相关的类似情况下如何采取不同行为的特征。我们利用 1966 年北芬兰出生队列(n = 4,731 至 5,882)来探讨将气质特征和经济偏好纳入职业选择的价值。我们利用北芬兰1966年出生队列2004年至2012年(含)的数据,探讨气质特征是否有助于职业选择。我们选择的职业组别在所需技能、教育水平和任务方面各不相同。数据的新颖性使我们能够确定气质特征和经济偏好是否对职业选择有显著影响,同时控制与人力资本方法相关的其他变量。我们发现,气质特征和经济偏好是职业行为的重要影响因素。我们的分析强调,在分析个人的职业选择时,必须共同探讨人力资本模型、非认知特质和其他非金钱因素的影响。我们揭示了不同职业的不同气质特征。据我们所知,目前还没有证据表明个人的气质特征、经济偏好和人力资本方法是如何共同作用于职业选择的。此外,由于数据的新颖性,我们还将教育等因素纳入其中,以控制我们的研究结果。我们发现不同职业在气质特征方面存在明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Labour Economics
Labour Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: Labour Economics is devoted to publishing research in the field of labour economics both on the microeconomic and on the macroeconomic level, in a balanced mix of theory, empirical testing and policy applications. It gives due recognition to analysis and explanation of institutional arrangements of national labour markets and the impact of these institutions on labour market outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信