Association between sex of the individual with untreated cleft lip and social judgement made by lay persons: A cross-sectional study

IF 2.4 3区医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1111/ocr.12823

Ana Carolina Del-Sarto Azevedo Maia, Stefanni Olga Aguiar Sales Lima, Lucas Alves Jural, David Costa Moreira, Lucianne Cople Maia, Orlando Motohiro Tanaka, Matheus Melo Pithon, Fabio Ornellas Prado

{"title":"Association between sex of the individual with untreated cleft lip and social judgement made by lay persons: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Ana Carolina Del-Sarto Azevedo Maia, Stefanni Olga Aguiar Sales Lima, Lucas Alves Jural, David Costa Moreira, Lucianne Cople Maia, Orlando Motohiro Tanaka, Matheus Melo Pithon, Fabio Ornellas Prado","doi":"10.1111/ocr.12823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To assess whether there is an association between an individual's sex and social judgements made by lay persons regarding untreated cleft lip.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Lay individuals over 18 years old were recruited through an application to respond online to two questionnaires: a sociodemographic survey and the Brazilian Version of Lay Persons' Social Judgements about Cleft-lip Scale (B-LSojCleft-S). B-LSojCleft-S comprises 14 items evaluating social judgements made by laypersons concerning different types of untreated cleft lips in teenagers. The 14 items are linked to 8 images featuring untreated cleft lips and 1 image without a cleft (control). Higher scores represented more favourable social judgements. Independent samples <i>t</i>-test, paired, and multiple linear regression were conducted (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The study assessed judgements of untreated cleft lips in male and female adolescents using the B-LSojCleft-S.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The mean age of the 217 participants was 37.78 ± 12.39 years, predominantly women (72.7%), married (47.7%), with a monthly income below three minimum wages (35.6%) in the majority of cases. Significantly higher social judgement scores were observed in the control group (no cleft) compared to any type of cleft (<i>P</i> < 0.001), with similar scores obtained for the same types of clefts with female or male images (<i>P</i> > 0.05). The participant's sex is associated with social judgement scores (<i>F</i> [1, 214] = 6.318, <i>P</i> = 0.013; adjusted <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.024), with females making more favourable judgements than males (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Individuals with cleft lips receive more negative social judgement scores, regardless of their own sex. Women make better social judgements than men.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":19652,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","volume":"27 5","pages":"821-830"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ocr.12823","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To assess whether there is an association between an individual's sex and social judgements made by lay persons regarding untreated cleft lip.

Materials and Methods

Lay individuals over 18 years old were recruited through an application to respond online to two questionnaires: a sociodemographic survey and the Brazilian Version of Lay Persons' Social Judgements about Cleft-lip Scale (B-LSojCleft-S). B-LSojCleft-S comprises 14 items evaluating social judgements made by laypersons concerning different types of untreated cleft lips in teenagers. The 14 items are linked to 8 images featuring untreated cleft lips and 1 image without a cleft (control). Higher scores represented more favourable social judgements. Independent samples t-test, paired, and multiple linear regression were conducted (P < 0.05). The study assessed judgements of untreated cleft lips in male and female adolescents using the B-LSojCleft-S.

Results

The mean age of the 217 participants was 37.78 ± 12.39 years, predominantly women (72.7%), married (47.7%), with a monthly income below three minimum wages (35.6%) in the majority of cases. Significantly higher social judgement scores were observed in the control group (no cleft) compared to any type of cleft (P < 0.001), with similar scores obtained for the same types of clefts with female or male images (P > 0.05). The participant's sex is associated with social judgement scores (F [1, 214] = 6.318, P = 0.013; adjusted R² = 0.024), with females making more favourable judgements than males (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Individuals with cleft lips receive more negative social judgement scores, regardless of their own sex. Women make better social judgements than men.

查看原文本刊更多论文

未经治疗的唇裂患者的性别与非专业人士的社会判断之间的关系：一项横断面研究。

摘要评估个人性别与非专业人士对未经治疗的唇裂的社会判断之间是否存在关联：通过应用程序招募 18 岁以上的非专业人士在线回答两份问卷：社会人口调查和巴西版非专业人士对唇裂的社会判断量表（B-LSojCleft-S）。B-LSojCleft-S 包含 14 个项目，评估非专业人士对不同类型未经治疗的青少年唇裂的社会判断。这 14 个项目与 8 幅未经治疗的唇裂图片和 1 幅无唇裂图片（对照组）相关联。得分越高，代表社会判断越有利。进行了独立样本 t 检验、配对检验和多元线性回归（P 结果：217 名参与者的平均年龄为 37.78 ± 12.39 岁，主要为女性（72.7%），已婚（47.7%），大多数人的月收入低于三份最低工资（35.6%）。与任何类型的裂隙相比，对照组（无裂隙）的社会判断得分明显更高（P 0.05）。受试者的性别与社交判断得分有关（F [1, 214] = 6.318, P = 0.013；调整后 R2 = 0.024），女性比男性做出更有利的判断（P 结论：女性比男性做出更有利的判断：唇裂患者无论其性别如何，都会得到更多负面的社会评判分数。女性比男性做出更好的社会判断。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research 医学-牙科与口腔外科

CiteScore

5.30

自引率

3.20%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research - Genes, Growth and Development is published to serve its readers as an international forum for the presentation and critical discussion of issues pertinent to the advancement of the specialty of orthodontics and the evidence-based knowledge of craniofacial growth and development. This forum is based on scientifically supported information, but also includes minority and conflicting opinions. The objective of the journal is to facilitate effective communication between the research community and practicing clinicians. Original papers of high scientific quality that report the findings of clinical trials, clinical epidemiology, and novel therapeutic or diagnostic approaches are appropriate submissions. Similarly, we welcome papers in genetics, developmental biology, syndromology, surgery, speech and hearing, and other biomedical disciplines related to clinical orthodontics and normal and abnormal craniofacial growth and development. In addition to original and basic research, the journal publishes concise reviews, case reports of substantial value, invited essays, letters, and announcements. The journal is published quarterly. The review of submitted papers will be coordinated by the editor and members of the editorial board. It is policy to review manuscripts within 3 to 4 weeks of receipt and to publish within 3 to 6 months of acceptance.