A crossover comparison of patient satisfaction with two teriparatide regimens: primary results of the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial 06 (JOINT-06).

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-11 DOI:10.1007/s00774-024-01521-7
Satoshi Soen, Yukari Uemura, Shiro Tanaka, Yasuhiro Takeuchi, Naoto Endo, Junichi Takada, Satoshi Ikeda, Jun Iwamoto, Nobukazu Okimoto, Sakae Tanaka
{"title":"A crossover comparison of patient satisfaction with two teriparatide regimens: primary results of the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial 06 (JOINT-06).","authors":"Satoshi Soen, Yukari Uemura, Shiro Tanaka, Yasuhiro Takeuchi, Naoto Endo, Junichi Takada, Satoshi Ikeda, Jun Iwamoto, Nobukazu Okimoto, Sakae Tanaka","doi":"10.1007/s00774-024-01521-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to compare treatment satisfaction with two dosing regimens (two teriparatide [TPTD] self-injection systems) in osteoporosis patients at high risk of fracture.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this open-label crossover randomized trial comparing self-injected once-daily (1/D)-TPTD with self-injected twice-weekly (2/W)-TPTD, three satisfaction variables were evaluated by questionnaire for 2 years. The primary endpoint was overall satisfaction and secondary endpoints were satisfaction with treatment effectiveness and with utility of the self-injection device. Changes in quality of life (QOL) assessed by EuroQol-5 Dimension, pain assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS), and anthropometric parameters were also analyzed. Safety was evaluated based on the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 1/D-TPTD and 2/W-TPTD groups consisted of 180 (75.9 ± 7.3 years) and 179 (age: 75.5 ± 6.9 years) patients, respectively. After 26 weeks of treatment, no significant between-group difference in the persistence rate (79.4% vs 72.6% in the 1/D-TPTD and 2/W-TPTD groups, respectively), distributions of overall satisfaction scores, and satisfaction with treatment (p > 0.05) were observed. However, several items of satisfaction with the utility of the injection device were significantly higher in the 2/W-TPTD group (p < 0.05). Statistical improvements from baseline values were observed in QOL and pain VAS in both groups (p < 0.05). No serious AEs were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The between-group similarity of overall treatment satisfaction and effectiveness scores and between-group difference in satisfaction with the utility of the self-injection device was useful information for real-world treatment of osteoporosis. Both medication regimens were well tolerated.</p>","PeriodicalId":15116,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"582-590"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11455704/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-024-01521-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to compare treatment satisfaction with two dosing regimens (two teriparatide [TPTD] self-injection systems) in osteoporosis patients at high risk of fracture.

Materials and methods: In this open-label crossover randomized trial comparing self-injected once-daily (1/D)-TPTD with self-injected twice-weekly (2/W)-TPTD, three satisfaction variables were evaluated by questionnaire for 2 years. The primary endpoint was overall satisfaction and secondary endpoints were satisfaction with treatment effectiveness and with utility of the self-injection device. Changes in quality of life (QOL) assessed by EuroQol-5 Dimension, pain assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS), and anthropometric parameters were also analyzed. Safety was evaluated based on the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs).

Results: The 1/D-TPTD and 2/W-TPTD groups consisted of 180 (75.9 ± 7.3 years) and 179 (age: 75.5 ± 6.9 years) patients, respectively. After 26 weeks of treatment, no significant between-group difference in the persistence rate (79.4% vs 72.6% in the 1/D-TPTD and 2/W-TPTD groups, respectively), distributions of overall satisfaction scores, and satisfaction with treatment (p > 0.05) were observed. However, several items of satisfaction with the utility of the injection device were significantly higher in the 2/W-TPTD group (p < 0.05). Statistical improvements from baseline values were observed in QOL and pain VAS in both groups (p < 0.05). No serious AEs were reported.

Conclusion: The between-group similarity of overall treatment satisfaction and effectiveness scores and between-group difference in satisfaction with the utility of the self-injection device was useful information for real-world treatment of osteoporosis. Both medication regimens were well tolerated.

Abstract Image

两种特立帕肽疗法患者满意度的交叉比较:日本骨质疏松症干预试验 06 (JOINT-06) 的主要结果。
导言:本研究旨在比较骨折高风险骨质疏松症患者对两种给药方案(两种特立帕肽[TPTD]自我注射系统)的治疗满意度:在这项开放标签交叉随机试验中,对比了每日一次自我注射(1/D)-TPTD 和每周两次自我注射(2/W)-TPTD,通过问卷对三个满意度变量进行了为期两年的评估。主要终点是总体满意度,次要终点是对治疗效果和自我注射装置的实用性的满意度。此外,还分析了以 EuroQol-5 Dimension 评估的生活质量(QOL)变化、以视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估的疼痛以及人体测量参数。根据不良事件(AEs)的发生率和严重程度对安全性进行了评估:1/D-TPTD组和2/W-TPTD组分别有180名(年龄:75.9±7.3岁)和179名(年龄:75.5±6.9岁)患者。治疗 26 周后,观察到 1/D-TPTD 组和 2/W-TPTD 组在持续率(分别为 79.4% 和 72.6%)、总体满意度评分分布和治疗满意度方面无明显组间差异(P > 0.05)。然而,2/W-TPTD 组对注射装置实用性的满意度的几个项目明显更高(p 结论:2/W-TPTD 组的满意度明显高于 1/D-TPTD 组(p > 0.05):总体治疗满意度和疗效评分的组间相似性,以及自我注射装置实用性满意度的组间差异,是现实世界中治疗骨质疏松症的有用信息。两种药物治疗方案的耐受性都很好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism (JBMM) provides an international forum for researchers and clinicians to present and discuss topics relevant to bone, teeth, and mineral metabolism, as well as joint and musculoskeletal disorders. The journal welcomes the submission of manuscripts from any country. Membership in the society is not a prerequisite for submission. Acceptance is based on the originality, significance, and validity of the material presented. The journal is aimed at researchers and clinicians dedicated to improvements in research, development, and patient-care in the fields of bone and mineral metabolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信