Challenges and solutions in 3D printing for oncology: a narrative review.

Abstract

Background and objective: Oncology is increasingly adopting three-dimensional (3D) printing, a method of creating objects through additive manufacturing using various techniques and materials. This technology, divided into conventional 3D printing (using non-biological materials like thermoplastics or titanium) and bioprinting (involving living cells and tissues), has shown potential in surgical planning, implant creation, and radiotherapy. However, despite promising preclinical and clinical applications, its clinical integration faces challenges such as a lack of strong evidence, standardized guidelines, and detailed data on costs and scalability. This study reviews the current use of 3D printing in oncology, aiming to differentiate between practical and experimental applications, thereby guiding clinicians interested in incorporating this technology.

Methods: A literature search was conducted to gather comments, reviews, and preclinical and clinical studies focusing on the use of 3D printing in oncology, with publications dated before December 1, 2023. The search for pertinent studies involved utilizing PubMed and Google Scholar Review. The selection process for articles was based on a unanimous consensus among all authors. We excluded topics related to bioprinting and the technical nuances of 3D printing.

Key content and findings: The review comprehensively describes the utilization of 3D printing in radiation oncology, surgical oncology, orthopedic oncology, medical oncology, hyperthermia, and patients' education. However, 3D printing faces several limitations that are related to unpredictable costs, difficult scalability, very complex regulations and lack of standardization.

Conclusions: 3D printing is increasingly useful in oncology for diagnostics and treatment, yet remains experimental and case-based. Despite growing literature, it focuses mostly on pre-clinical studies and case reports, with few clinical studies involving small samples. Thus, extensive research is needed to fully evaluate its efficacy and application in larger patient groups.