Echocardiogram by apical-subcostal protocol in prone position during invasive mechanical ventilation in cardiovascular intensive care unit.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
César Del Castillo, Fernando Verdugo, Franco Appiani, Francisca Yáñez, Camila Bontá, Carlos Torres-Herrera, Angela Garcia, Zorba Blázquez-Bermejo, Javier Castrodeza, Daniel Requena, Andreina Rodríguez, Arquimedes Silvio, Agustín Gatica, Arnulfo Begazo, Mario Alfaro
{"title":"Echocardiogram by apical-subcostal protocol in prone position during invasive mechanical ventilation in cardiovascular intensive care unit.","authors":"César Del Castillo, Fernando Verdugo, Franco Appiani, Francisca Yáñez, Camila Bontá, Carlos Torres-Herrera, Angela Garcia, Zorba Blázquez-Bermejo, Javier Castrodeza, Daniel Requena, Andreina Rodríguez, Arquimedes Silvio, Agustín Gatica, Arnulfo Begazo, Mario Alfaro","doi":"10.1186/s12947-024-00326-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility of a transthoracic echocardiogram using an apical-subcostal protocol in invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and prone position.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective study of adults who required a prone position during IMV. A pillow was placed only under the left hemithorax in the prone position to elevate and ease the apical and subcostal windows. A critical care cardiologist (prone group) acquired and evaluated the images using the apical-subcostal protocol. Besides, we used ambulatory echocardiograms performed as a comparative group (supine group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>86 patients were included, 43 in the prone and 43 in the supine. In the prone group, the indication to perform an echocardiogram was hemodynamic monitoring. All patients were ventilated with protective parameters, and the mean end-expiratory pressure was 10.6 cmH2O. The protocol was performed entirely in 42 of 43 patients in the prone group because one patient did not have any acoustic window. In the 43 patients in the prone group analyzed and compared to the supine group, global biventricular function was assessed in 97.7% (p = 1.0), severe heart valve disease in 88.4% (p = 0.055), ruled out of the presence of pulmonary hypertension in 76.7% (p = 0.80), pericardial effusion in 93% (p = 0.12), and volume status by inferior vena cava in 93% (p = 0.48). Comparing prone versus supine position, a statistical difference was found when evaluating the left ventricle apical 2-chamber view (65.1 versus 100%, p < 0.01) and its segmental function (53.4 versus 100%, p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The echocardiogram using an apical-subcostal protocol is feasible in patients in the IMV and prone position.</p>","PeriodicalId":9613,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Ultrasound","volume":"22 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11163713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12947-024-00326-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the feasibility of a transthoracic echocardiogram using an apical-subcostal protocol in invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and prone position.

Methods: Prospective study of adults who required a prone position during IMV. A pillow was placed only under the left hemithorax in the prone position to elevate and ease the apical and subcostal windows. A critical care cardiologist (prone group) acquired and evaluated the images using the apical-subcostal protocol. Besides, we used ambulatory echocardiograms performed as a comparative group (supine group).

Results: 86 patients were included, 43 in the prone and 43 in the supine. In the prone group, the indication to perform an echocardiogram was hemodynamic monitoring. All patients were ventilated with protective parameters, and the mean end-expiratory pressure was 10.6 cmH2O. The protocol was performed entirely in 42 of 43 patients in the prone group because one patient did not have any acoustic window. In the 43 patients in the prone group analyzed and compared to the supine group, global biventricular function was assessed in 97.7% (p = 1.0), severe heart valve disease in 88.4% (p = 0.055), ruled out of the presence of pulmonary hypertension in 76.7% (p = 0.80), pericardial effusion in 93% (p = 0.12), and volume status by inferior vena cava in 93% (p = 0.48). Comparing prone versus supine position, a statistical difference was found when evaluating the left ventricle apical 2-chamber view (65.1 versus 100%, p < 0.01) and its segmental function (53.4 versus 100%, p < 0.01).

Conclusion: The echocardiogram using an apical-subcostal protocol is feasible in patients in the IMV and prone position.

在心血管重症监护病房进行有创机械通气时,采用俯卧位心尖-肋下方案进行超声心动图检查。
目的:评估在有创机械通气(IMV)和俯卧位时使用心尖-肋下方案进行经胸超声心动图检查的可行性:方法: 对需要在有创机械通气过程中采取俯卧位的成人进行前瞻性研究。俯卧位时仅在左侧胸腔下放置一个枕头,以抬高并放松心尖和肋下窗。一名重症监护心脏病专家(俯卧组)采用心尖-肋下方案采集并评估图像。此外,我们还使用非卧床超声心动图作为对比组(仰卧组):结果:共纳入 86 例患者,其中 43 例为俯卧位患者,43 例为仰卧位患者。在俯卧组,进行超声心动图检查的指征是血液动力学监测。所有患者均采用保护性参数通气,平均呼气末压力为 10.6 cmH2O。由于一名患者没有任何声窗,俯卧组 43 名患者中的 42 名完全执行了该方案。在俯卧组的 43 名患者中,经分析并与仰卧组比较,97.7% 的患者评估出了整体双心室功能(p = 1.0),88.4% 的患者评估出了严重的心脏瓣膜病(p = 0.055),76.7% 的患者排除了肺动脉高压(p = 0.80),93% 的患者排除了心包积液(p = 0.12),93% 的患者通过下腔静脉评估了血容量状态(p = 0.48)。比较俯卧位和仰卧位,发现在评估左心室心尖两腔切面时存在统计学差异(65.1% 对 100%,P 结论:俯卧位和仰卧位的超声心动图检查结果存在统计学差异:采用心尖-肋下方案进行超声心动图检查对 IMV 和俯卧位患者是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Ultrasound
Cardiovascular Ultrasound CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Ultrasound is an online journal, publishing peer-reviewed: original research; authoritative reviews; case reports on challenging and/or unusual diagnostic aspects; and expert opinions on new techniques and technologies. We are particularly interested in articles that include relevant images or video files, which provide an additional dimension to published articles and enhance understanding. As an open access journal, Cardiovascular Ultrasound ensures high visibility for authors in addition to providing an up-to-date and freely available resource for the community. The journal welcomes discussion, and provides a forum for publishing opinion and debate ranging from biology to engineering to clinical echocardiography, with both speed and versatility.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信