Heading in football: a systematic review of descriptors, definitions, and reporting methods used in heading incidence studies.

Kerry Peek, Andrew Ross, Thor Einar Andersen, Tim Meyer, Sara Dahlen, Julia Georgieva, Paula R Williamson, Mike Clarke, Andreas Serner
{"title":"Heading in football: a systematic review of descriptors, definitions, and reporting methods used in heading incidence studies.","authors":"Kerry Peek, Andrew Ross, Thor Einar Andersen, Tim Meyer, Sara Dahlen, Julia Georgieva, Paula R Williamson, Mike Clarke, Andreas Serner","doi":"10.1080/24733938.2024.2362191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The primary objective of this systematic review was to describe the number and type of heading descriptors used in all published studies which report on heading incidence in football. The secondary objective was to detail the data collection and reporting methods used in the included studies to present heading incidence data. Eligible studies were identified through searches of five electronic databases: Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science, using a combination of free-text keywords (inception to 12th September 2023). Manual searching of reference lists and retrieved systematic reviews was also performed. A descriptive overview and synthesis of the results is presented. From 1620 potentially eligible studies, 71 studies were included, with the following key findings: 1) only 61% of studies defined a header with even fewer (23%) providing an operational definition of a header within the methods; 2) important study and player demographic data including year and country were often not reported; 3) reported heading descriptors and their coding options varied greatly; 4) visual identification of headers was essential when inertial measurement units were used to collect heading incidence data; and 5) there was a lack of standardisation in the reporting methods used in heading incidence studies making comparison between studies challenging. To address these findings, the development of a standardised, internationally supported, operational definition of a header and related heading descriptors should be prioritised. Further recommendations include the development of minimum reporting criteria for heading incidence research.</p>","PeriodicalId":74767,"journal":{"name":"Science & medicine in football","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & medicine in football","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24733938.2024.2362191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The primary objective of this systematic review was to describe the number and type of heading descriptors used in all published studies which report on heading incidence in football. The secondary objective was to detail the data collection and reporting methods used in the included studies to present heading incidence data. Eligible studies were identified through searches of five electronic databases: Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science, using a combination of free-text keywords (inception to 12th September 2023). Manual searching of reference lists and retrieved systematic reviews was also performed. A descriptive overview and synthesis of the results is presented. From 1620 potentially eligible studies, 71 studies were included, with the following key findings: 1) only 61% of studies defined a header with even fewer (23%) providing an operational definition of a header within the methods; 2) important study and player demographic data including year and country were often not reported; 3) reported heading descriptors and their coding options varied greatly; 4) visual identification of headers was essential when inertial measurement units were used to collect heading incidence data; and 5) there was a lack of standardisation in the reporting methods used in heading incidence studies making comparison between studies challenging. To address these findings, the development of a standardised, internationally supported, operational definition of a header and related heading descriptors should be prioritised. Further recommendations include the development of minimum reporting criteria for heading incidence research.

足球中的头球:头球发生率研究中使用的描述符、定义和报告方法的系统性回顾。
本系统性综述的主要目的是描述所有已发表的、报告足球运动中撞墙事件的研究中所使用的撞墙描述符的数量和类型。次要目标是详细说明纳入研究中使用的数据收集和报告方法,以呈现标题发生率数据。通过对五个电子数据库的检索,确定了符合条件的研究:使用自由文本关键字组合检索 Ovid MEDLINE、CINAHL、EMBASE、SPORTDiscus 和 Web of Science(起始日期至 2023 年 9 月 12 日)。此外,还对参考文献目录和检索到的系统性综述进行了人工检索。本文对研究结果进行了描述性概述和综述。从 1620 项可能符合条件的研究中,纳入了 71 项研究,主要发现如下:1)只有 61% 的研究定义了标头,而在方法中提供标头操作定义的研究则更少(23%);2)包括年份和国家在内的重要研究和运动员人口统计数据往往没有报告;3)报告的标头描述符及其编码选项差异很大;4)当使用惯性测量单元收集标头发生率数据时,目视识别标头至关重要;5)标头发生率研究中使用的报告方法缺乏标准化,使得研究之间的比较具有挑战性。针对这些发现,应优先考虑制定一个标准化的、国际支持的、可操作的航标定义和相关航标描述符。进一步的建议包括制定标题发生率研究的最低报告标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信