Evaluation Design for the Department of the Air Force's True North Program: Development of a Logic Model and Program Measures.

Rand health quarterly Pub Date : 2024-06-03 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01
Miriam Matthews, Thomas E Trail, Samantha E DiNicola, Coreen Farris, Jenna W Kramer, Isabelle González
{"title":"Evaluation Design for the Department of the Air Force's True North Program: Development of a Logic Model and Program Measures.","authors":"Miriam Matthews, Thomas E Trail, Samantha E DiNicola, Coreen Farris, Jenna W Kramer, Isabelle González","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Developing strong resiliency and care solutions for airmen and guardians is key to human capital development and force readiness. The True North program is one of the Department of the Air Force's (DAF's) most significant recent investments in promoting the resiliency of its people. Assessing the program's level of success, justifying funding, and informing decisions about the program's future will require a rigorous evaluation. The authors of this study (1) identify desired outcomes for members participating in the program, (2) define appropriate measures of effectiveness that could be used in evaluating the True North program, and (3) make recommendations for ongoing internal evaluation of the program. The True North program encompasses selected installation welcome centers, embedded religious support teams (RSTs), and embedded mental health (EMH) teams. To determine how DAF might evaluate this program and its components, the authors reviewed relevant policies and procedures and literature relevant to the program components and conducted interviews with 17 True North program personnel and 21 group and squadron commanders. They present a program logic model to determine potential evaluation measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":74637,"journal":{"name":"Rand health quarterly","volume":"11 3","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11147640/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rand health quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Developing strong resiliency and care solutions for airmen and guardians is key to human capital development and force readiness. The True North program is one of the Department of the Air Force's (DAF's) most significant recent investments in promoting the resiliency of its people. Assessing the program's level of success, justifying funding, and informing decisions about the program's future will require a rigorous evaluation. The authors of this study (1) identify desired outcomes for members participating in the program, (2) define appropriate measures of effectiveness that could be used in evaluating the True North program, and (3) make recommendations for ongoing internal evaluation of the program. The True North program encompasses selected installation welcome centers, embedded religious support teams (RSTs), and embedded mental health (EMH) teams. To determine how DAF might evaluate this program and its components, the authors reviewed relevant policies and procedures and literature relevant to the program components and conducted interviews with 17 True North program personnel and 21 group and squadron commanders. They present a program logic model to determine potential evaluation measures.

空军部 "真正北方 "计划的评估设计:开发逻辑模型和计划措施。
为空军人员和监护人开发强大的复原力和护理解决方案是人力资本发展和部队战备的关键。真正北方 "计划是美国空军部(DAF)近期在促进其人员复原力方面最重要的投资之一。要评估该计划的成功程度、证明资金的合理性并为该计划的未来决策提供依据,就必须进行严格的评估。本研究报告的作者(1)确定了参与该计划的成员的预期成果,(2)定义了可用于评估 "真正北方 "计划的适当的有效性衡量标准,(3)为该计划的持续内部评估提出了建议。真北计划包括选定的安装欢迎中心、嵌入式宗教支持团队 (RST) 和嵌入式心理健康 (EMH) 团队。为确定陆军如何评估该计划及其组成部分,作者审查了与计划组成部分相关的政策、程序和文献,并对 17 名 "真北 "计划人员和 21 名大队及中队指挥官进行了访谈。他们提出了一个计划逻辑模型,以确定潜在的评估措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信