The effect of motivational interviewing on quality of life and self-efficacy behaviors of individuals with chronic illness: A meta-analysis study.

IF 1.7 4区医学 Q2 NURSING

Public Health Nursing Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1111/phn.13339

Sevda Uzun, Nermin Gürhan

{"title":"The effect of motivational interviewing on quality of life and self-efficacy behaviors of individuals with chronic illness: A meta-analysis study.","authors":"Sevda Uzun, Nermin Gürhan","doi":"10.1111/phn.13339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aims to reveal the effect of the motivational interviewing on the quality of life and self-efficacy behaviors of individuals with chronic diseases.Material-method: For this meta-analysis study, PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, Google Scholar, and YÖK Theses databases were searched in January-May 2021 without year limitation. As a result, 38 studies were included in the study: 23 for the quality of life variable, and 21 for the self-efficacy behaviors variable (in 6 studies, both variables were examined together). The data were synthesized with meta-analysis and narrative methods. The total sample size of the studies is 25,425.Results: This meta-analysis study showed that the motivational interviewing applied to individuals with chronic diseases changed their quality of life (SMD: 0.296, %95 CI: 0.054-0.537, Z = 2.402, p = .016, I2 = %95). The type of chronic disease, measurement tool, sample group, disease group, age range, and whether the motivational interviewer was a nurse or not changed the effect size of the motivational interviewing on the quality of life. The self-efficacy score average of the experimental group to which motivational interviewing was applied was statistically similar to that of the control group (SMD: 0.141, %95 CI: -0.065, 0.347; Z = 1.346, p = .178, I2 = %87).Conclusions: As a result of the meta-analysis, it was determined that the use of motivational interviewing increased the quality of life level of individuals with chronic diseases. However, it is thought that more research is needed because some studies were conducted with small sample size and prepost test design. The results of the study may provide guidance on the interventions to be used in improving the quality of life of individuals with chronic diseases.","PeriodicalId":54533,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.13339","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to reveal the effect of the motivational interviewing on the quality of life and self-efficacy behaviors of individuals with chronic diseases.

Material-method: For this meta-analysis study, PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, Google Scholar, and YÖK Theses databases were searched in January-May 2021 without year limitation. As a result, 38 studies were included in the study: 23 for the quality of life variable, and 21 for the self-efficacy behaviors variable (in 6 studies, both variables were examined together). The data were synthesized with meta-analysis and narrative methods. The total sample size of the studies is 25,425.

Results: This meta-analysis study showed that the motivational interviewing applied to individuals with chronic diseases changed their quality of life (SMD: 0.296, %95 CI: 0.054-0.537, Z = 2.402, p = .016, I²= %95). The type of chronic disease, measurement tool, sample group, disease group, age range, and whether the motivational interviewer was a nurse or not changed the effect size of the motivational interviewing on the quality of life. The self-efficacy score average of the experimental group to which motivational interviewing was applied was statistically similar to that of the control group (SMD: 0.141, %95 CI: -0.065, 0.347; Z = 1.346, p = .178, I²= %87).

Conclusions: As a result of the meta-analysis, it was determined that the use of motivational interviewing increased the quality of life level of individuals with chronic diseases. However, it is thought that more research is needed because some studies were conducted with small sample size and prepost test design. The results of the study may provide guidance on the interventions to be used in improving the quality of life of individuals with chronic diseases.

查看原文本刊更多论文

动机访谈对慢性病患者生活质量和自我效能行为的影响：一项荟萃分析研究。

目的：本研究旨在揭示动机访谈对慢性病患者生活质量和自我效能行为的影响：本研究旨在揭示动机访谈对慢性病患者生活质量和自我效能行为的影响：为了进行这项荟萃分析研究，我们检索了 2021 年 1 月至 5 月期间的 PubMed、Web of Science、EBSCOhost、Google Scholar 和 YÖK Theses 数据库，没有年份限制。结果，38 项研究被纳入研究：23 项研究涉及生活质量变量，21 项研究涉及自我效能行为变量（在 6 项研究中，这两个变量被一并研究）。研究采用荟萃分析法和叙述法对数据进行了综合。研究的总样本量为 25 425 个：这项荟萃分析研究表明，对慢性病患者进行动机访谈能改变他们的生活质量（SMD：0.296，%95 CI：0.054-0.537，Z = 2.402，p = .016，I2 = %95）。慢性病类型、测量工具、样本组、疾病组、年龄范围以及动机访谈者是否为护士都会改变动机访谈对生活质量的影响大小。采用激励访谈的实验组与对照组的自我效能得分平均值在统计学上相似（SMD：0.141，%95 CI：-0.065，0.347；Z = 1.346，p = .178，I2 = %87）：荟萃分析结果表明，使用激励性访谈提高了慢性病患者的生活质量。然而，由于一些研究的样本量较小，且采用了前测设计，因此认为还需要进行更多的研究。研究结果可为改善慢性病患者生活质量的干预措施提供指导。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Public Health Nursing 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生

CiteScore

3.50

自引率

4.80%

发文量

117

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Public Health Nursing publishes empirical research reports, program evaluations, and case reports focused on populations at risk across the lifespan. The journal also prints articles related to developments in practice, education of public health nurses, theory development, methodological innovations, legal, ethical, and public policy issues in public health, and the history of public health nursing throughout the world. While the primary readership of the Journal is North American, the journal is expanding its mission to address global public health concerns of interest to nurses.