Use of tcdC gene sequencing to prevent misidentification of Clostridioides difficile ribotype 176 and 027.

Q2 Medicine
Tatiana Havrilova, Elena Novakova, Vincent Lucansky, Andrea Stanclova, Martina Neuschlova
{"title":"Use of tcdC gene sequencing to prevent misidentification of Clostridioides difficile ribotype 176 and 027.","authors":"Tatiana Havrilova, Elena Novakova, Vincent Lucansky, Andrea Stanclova, Martina Neuschlova","doi":"10.17392/1693-21-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the sequences of the tcdC gene between Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) strains identified as PCR ribotype 176 and the reference strain C. difficile PCR ribotype 027 and to evaluate the use of the Xpert C. difficile/Epi assay for their differentiation.</p><p><strong>Materials: </strong>A total of 45 strains were grown from storage beads. DNA of sufficient quality and quantity for sequencing was extracted from 9 samples. Single consensus sequences of PCR ribotype 176 strains and PCR ribotype 001, PCR ribotype 070 (a control group) were mapped to a reference genome of strain CDI-01 (PCR ribotype 027).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four strains (out of seven; 57%) characterized as PCR ribotype 176 had 100% identity of the tcdC gene with the reference strain. The average length of the tcdC gene in these four strains (PCR ribotype 176) was 643 bp, which is 36 bp shorter than the reference genome. Three strains (PCR ribotype 176) had a percentage identity of the tcdC gene in the range of 99.37-100%. Strains 25 (PCR ribotype 001) and 28 (PCR ribotype 070) had a similarity in the range of 95.39-95.63% as a result of different ribotype to the reference strain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCR ribotype 176 strains have almost the same tcdC gene sequence as PCR ribotype 027, resulting in misidentification of this PCR ribotype by the Xpert C. difficile/Epi assay. Information about presumptive positive results based on deletion in the tcdC gene should be treated with caution or disregarded.</p>","PeriodicalId":51129,"journal":{"name":"Medicinski Glasnik","volume":"21 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicinski Glasnik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17392/1693-21-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To compare the sequences of the tcdC gene between Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) strains identified as PCR ribotype 176 and the reference strain C. difficile PCR ribotype 027 and to evaluate the use of the Xpert C. difficile/Epi assay for their differentiation.

Materials: A total of 45 strains were grown from storage beads. DNA of sufficient quality and quantity for sequencing was extracted from 9 samples. Single consensus sequences of PCR ribotype 176 strains and PCR ribotype 001, PCR ribotype 070 (a control group) were mapped to a reference genome of strain CDI-01 (PCR ribotype 027).

Results: Four strains (out of seven; 57%) characterized as PCR ribotype 176 had 100% identity of the tcdC gene with the reference strain. The average length of the tcdC gene in these four strains (PCR ribotype 176) was 643 bp, which is 36 bp shorter than the reference genome. Three strains (PCR ribotype 176) had a percentage identity of the tcdC gene in the range of 99.37-100%. Strains 25 (PCR ribotype 001) and 28 (PCR ribotype 070) had a similarity in the range of 95.39-95.63% as a result of different ribotype to the reference strain.

Conclusion: PCR ribotype 176 strains have almost the same tcdC gene sequence as PCR ribotype 027, resulting in misidentification of this PCR ribotype by the Xpert C. difficile/Epi assay. Information about presumptive positive results based on deletion in the tcdC gene should be treated with caution or disregarded.

利用 tcdC 基因测序防止错误识别艰难梭菌核糖核型 176 和 027。
目的:比较被鉴定为PCR核型176的艰难梭菌(C. difficile)菌株与参考菌株艰难梭菌PCR核型027之间的tcdC基因序列,并评估使用Xpert艰难梭菌/Epi测定法对它们进行区分的效果:材料:从储存珠中培养出 45 株菌株。从 9 个样本中提取了足够质量和数量的 DNA 用于测序。将 PCR 核型 176 菌株和 PCR 核型 001、PCR 核型 070(对照组)的单一共识序列映射到 CDI-01 菌株(PCR 核型 027)的参考基因组:结果:7株菌株中有4株(占57%)被定性为PCR核糖体176型,其tcdC基因与参考菌株具有100%的同一性。这四株菌株(PCR 核型 176)的 tcdC 基因平均长度为 643 bp,比参考基因组短 36 bp。3 株菌株(PCR 核糖体 176 型)的 tcdC 基因相同率在 99.37%-100%之间。25 株(PCR 核糖体 001 型)和 28 株(PCR 核糖体 070 型)由于与参考菌株的核糖体型不同,其相似度在 95.39-95.63% 之间:结论:PCR核型176菌株的tcdC基因序列与PCR核型027几乎相同,导致Xpert艰难梭菌/Epi检测法对该PCR核型的识别错误。基于 tcdC 基因缺失的推定阳性结果的信息应谨慎对待或不予考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicinski Glasnik
Medicinski Glasnik 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicinski Glasnik (MG) is the official publication (two times per year) of the Medical Association of Zenica-Doboj Canton. Manuscripts that present of original basic and applied research from all fields of medicine (general and clinical practice, and basic medical sciences) are invited.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信