Performance of the EDACS-ADP incorporating highsensitivity troponin assay: Do components of major adverse cardiac events matter?

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Yedalm Yoo, Shin Ahn, Bora Chae, Won Young Kim
{"title":"Performance of the EDACS-ADP incorporating highsensitivity troponin assay: Do components of major adverse cardiac events matter?","authors":"Yedalm Yoo, Shin Ahn, Bora Chae, Won Young Kim","doi":"10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2024.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The accelerated diagnostic protocol (ADP) using the Emergency Department Assessment of Chest pain Score (EDACS-ADP), a tool to identify patients at low risk of a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) among patients presenting with chest pain to the emergency department, was developed using a contemporary troponin assay. This study was performed to validate and compare the performance of the EDACS-ADP incorporating high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I between patients who had a 30-day MACE with and without unstable angina (MACE I and II, respectively).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center prospective observational study of adult patients presenting with chest pain suggestive of acute coronary syndrome was performed. The performance of EDACS-ADP in predicting MACE was assessed by calculating the sensitivity and negative predictive value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1,304 patients prospectively enrolled, 399 (30.6%; 95% confidence interval [95% <i>CI</i>]: 27.7%-33.8%) were considered low-risk using the EDACS-ADP. Among them, the rates of MACE I and II were 1.3% (5/399) and 1.0% (4/399), respectively. The EDACS-ADP showed sensitivities and negative predictive values of 98.8% (95% <i>CI</i>: 97.2%-99.6%) and 98.7% (95% <i>CI</i>: 97.0%-99.5%) for MACE I and 98.7% (95% <i>CI</i>: 96.8%-99.7%) and 99.0% (95% <i>CI</i>: 97.4%-99.6%) for MACE II, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EDACS-ADP could help identify patients as safe for early discharge. However, when unstable angina was added to the outcome, the 30-day MACE rate among the designated low-risk patients remained above the level acceptable for early discharge without further evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23685,"journal":{"name":"World journal of emergency medicine","volume":"15 3","pages":"175-180"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11153373/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2024.032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The accelerated diagnostic protocol (ADP) using the Emergency Department Assessment of Chest pain Score (EDACS-ADP), a tool to identify patients at low risk of a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) among patients presenting with chest pain to the emergency department, was developed using a contemporary troponin assay. This study was performed to validate and compare the performance of the EDACS-ADP incorporating high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I between patients who had a 30-day MACE with and without unstable angina (MACE I and II, respectively).

Methods: A single-center prospective observational study of adult patients presenting with chest pain suggestive of acute coronary syndrome was performed. The performance of EDACS-ADP in predicting MACE was assessed by calculating the sensitivity and negative predictive value.

Results: Of the 1,304 patients prospectively enrolled, 399 (30.6%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 27.7%-33.8%) were considered low-risk using the EDACS-ADP. Among them, the rates of MACE I and II were 1.3% (5/399) and 1.0% (4/399), respectively. The EDACS-ADP showed sensitivities and negative predictive values of 98.8% (95% CI: 97.2%-99.6%) and 98.7% (95% CI: 97.0%-99.5%) for MACE I and 98.7% (95% CI: 96.8%-99.7%) and 99.0% (95% CI: 97.4%-99.6%) for MACE II, respectively.

Conclusion: EDACS-ADP could help identify patients as safe for early discharge. However, when unstable angina was added to the outcome, the 30-day MACE rate among the designated low-risk patients remained above the level acceptable for early discharge without further evaluation.

结合高敏肌钙蛋白测定的 EDACS-ADP 的性能:重大心脏不良事件的组成部分重要吗?
背景:使用急诊科胸痛评估评分(EDACS-ADP)的加速诊断方案(ADP)是一种在急诊科胸痛患者中识别重大心脏不良事件(MACE)低风险患者的工具,该方案是使用当代肌钙蛋白测定法开发的。本研究旨在验证和比较 EDACS-ADP 在 30 天内发生 MACE 的不稳定型心绞痛患者(分别为 MACE I 和 MACE II)中使用高敏心肌肌钙蛋白 I 的效果:对出现胸痛提示急性冠脉综合征的成年患者进行了一项单中心前瞻性观察研究。通过计算灵敏度和阴性预测值来评估 EDACS-ADP 预测 MACE 的性能:在前瞻性纳入的 1304 名患者中,有 399 人(30.6%;95% 置信区间 [95%CI]:27.7%-33.8%)使用 EDACS-ADP 被认为是低风险患者。其中,MACE I 和 II 的发生率分别为 1.3%(5/399)和 1.0%(4/399)。EDACS-ADP对MACE I的灵敏度和阴性预测值分别为98.8%(95% CI:97.2%-99.6%)和98.7%(95% CI:97.0%-99.5%),对MACE II的灵敏度和阴性预测值分别为98.7%(95% CI:96.8%-99.7%)和99.0%(95% CI:97.4%-99.6%):结论:EDACS-ADP可帮助识别可安全提前出院的患者。结论:EDACS-ADP 可帮助确定哪些患者可安全提前出院,但在结果中加入不稳定型心绞痛时,指定的低风险患者的 30 天 MACE 发生率仍高于无需进一步评估即可提前出院的可接受水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
671
期刊介绍: The journal will cover technical, clinical and bioengineering studies related to multidisciplinary specialties of emergency medicine, such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation, acute injury, out-of-hospital emergency medical service, intensive care, injury and disease prevention, disaster management, healthy policy and ethics, toxicology, and sudden illness, including cardiology, internal medicine, anesthesiology, orthopedics, and trauma care, and more. The journal also features basic science, special reports, case reports, board review questions, and more. Editorials and communications to the editor explore controversial issues and encourage further discussion by physicians dealing with emergency medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信