Diagnostic performance and inter-reader reliability of bone reporting and data system (Bone-RADS) on computed tomography.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Skeletal Radiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-09 DOI:10.1007/s00256-024-04721-4
Chankue Park, Arash Azhideh, Atefe Pooyan, Ehsan Alipour, Sara Haseli, Ishan Satwah, Majid Chalian
{"title":"Diagnostic performance and inter-reader reliability of bone reporting and data system (Bone-RADS) on computed tomography.","authors":"Chankue Park, Arash Azhideh, Atefe Pooyan, Ehsan Alipour, Sara Haseli, Ishan Satwah, Majid Chalian","doi":"10.1007/s00256-024-04721-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic performance and inter-reader reliability of the Bone Reporting and Data System (Bone-RADS) for solitary bone lesions on CT.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis included 179 patients (mean age, 56 ± 18 years; 94 men) who underwent bone biopsies between March 2005 and September 2021. Patients with solitary bone lesions on CT and sufficient histopathology results were included. Two radiologists categorized the bone lesions using the Bone-RADS (1, benign; 4, malignant). The diagnostic performance of the Bone-RADS was calculated using histopathology results as a standard reference. Inter-reader reliability was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bone lesions were categorized into two groups: 103 lucent (pathology: 34 benign, 12 intermediate, 54 malignant, and 3 osteomyelitis) and 76 sclerotic/mixed (pathology: 46 benign, 2 intermediate, 26 malignant, and 2 osteomyelitis) lesions. The Bone-RADS for lucent lesions had sensitivities of 95% and 82%, specificities of 11% and 11%, and accuracies of 57% and 50% for readers 1 and 2, respectively. The Bone-RADS for sclerotic/mixed lesions had sensitivities of 75% and 68%, specificities of 27% and 27%, and accuracies of 45% and 42% for readers 1 and 2, respectively. Inter-reader reliability was moderate to very good (κ = 0.744, overall; 0.565, lucent lesions; and 0.851, sclerotic/mixed lesions).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bone-RADS has a high sensitivity for evaluating malignancy in lucent bone lesions and good inter-reader reliability. However, it has poor specificity and accuracy for both lucent and sclerotic/mixed lesions. A possible explanation is that proposed algorithms heavily depend on clinical features such as pain and history of malignancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":21783,"journal":{"name":"Skeletal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"209-217"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skeletal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-024-04721-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance and inter-reader reliability of the Bone Reporting and Data System (Bone-RADS) for solitary bone lesions on CT.

Materials and methods: This retrospective analysis included 179 patients (mean age, 56 ± 18 years; 94 men) who underwent bone biopsies between March 2005 and September 2021. Patients with solitary bone lesions on CT and sufficient histopathology results were included. Two radiologists categorized the bone lesions using the Bone-RADS (1, benign; 4, malignant). The diagnostic performance of the Bone-RADS was calculated using histopathology results as a standard reference. Inter-reader reliability was calculated.

Results: Bone lesions were categorized into two groups: 103 lucent (pathology: 34 benign, 12 intermediate, 54 malignant, and 3 osteomyelitis) and 76 sclerotic/mixed (pathology: 46 benign, 2 intermediate, 26 malignant, and 2 osteomyelitis) lesions. The Bone-RADS for lucent lesions had sensitivities of 95% and 82%, specificities of 11% and 11%, and accuracies of 57% and 50% for readers 1 and 2, respectively. The Bone-RADS for sclerotic/mixed lesions had sensitivities of 75% and 68%, specificities of 27% and 27%, and accuracies of 45% and 42% for readers 1 and 2, respectively. Inter-reader reliability was moderate to very good (κ = 0.744, overall; 0.565, lucent lesions; and 0.851, sclerotic/mixed lesions).

Conclusion: Bone-RADS has a high sensitivity for evaluating malignancy in lucent bone lesions and good inter-reader reliability. However, it has poor specificity and accuracy for both lucent and sclerotic/mixed lesions. A possible explanation is that proposed algorithms heavily depend on clinical features such as pain and history of malignancy.

Abstract Image

骨报告和数据系统(Bone-RADS)对计算机断层扫描的诊断性能和阅片员之间的可靠性。
目的评估骨报告和数据系统(Bone-RADS)对 CT 上单发骨病变的诊断性能和阅片员之间的可靠性:这项回顾性分析包括 2005 年 3 月至 2021 年 9 月期间接受骨活检的 179 名患者(平均年龄 56 ± 18 岁;94 名男性)。纳入的患者均在 CT 上有单发骨病变,并有足够的组织病理学结果。两名放射科医生使用 Bone-RADS 对骨病变进行分类(1 为良性;4 为恶性)。以组织病理学结果作为标准参考,计算了 Bone-RADS 的诊断性能。计算了阅读者之间的可靠性:结果:骨病变分为两组:103 例透明病变(病理:34 例良性、12 例中度、54 例恶性和 3 例骨髓炎)和 76 例硬化/混合病变(病理:46 例良性、2 例中度、26 例恶性和 2 例骨髓炎)。Bone-RADS对透明病变的敏感性分别为95%和82%,特异性分别为11%和11%,1号和2号读者的准确率分别为57%和50%。Bone-RADS对硬化性/混合性病变的敏感性分别为75%和68%,特异性分别为27%和27%,1号和2号读者的准确率分别为45%和42%。阅读器之间的可靠性为中等到非常好(κ = 0.744,整体;0.565,透明病变;0.851,硬化/混合病变):结论:Bone-RADS 对评估透明骨病变中的恶性肿瘤具有较高的灵敏度和良好的读片者间可靠性。结论:Bone-RADS 对评估透明骨病变中的恶性肿瘤具有较高的灵敏度和良好的读片者间可靠性,但对透明和硬化/混合性病变的特异性和准确性较差。一种可能的解释是,所提出的算法在很大程度上依赖于疼痛和恶性肿瘤病史等临床特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Skeletal Radiology
Skeletal Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.50%
发文量
253
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Skeletal Radiology provides a forum for the dissemination of current knowledge and information dealing with disorders of the musculoskeletal system including the spine. While emphasizing the radiological aspects of the many varied skeletal abnormalities, the journal also adopts an interdisciplinary approach, reflecting the membership of the International Skeletal Society. Thus, the anatomical, pathological, physiological, clinical, metabolic and epidemiological aspects of the many entities affecting the skeleton receive appropriate consideration. This is the Journal of the International Skeletal Society and the Official Journal of the Society of Skeletal Radiology and the Australasian Musculoskelelal Imaging Group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信