Intraspecific differences in the photosynthetic responses to chloroplast CO2 and photon flux density at different leaf temperatures of four grapevine cultivars grown in common outdoor conditions.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-06-05 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1002/pld3.595
Dennis H Greer
{"title":"Intraspecific differences in the photosynthetic responses to chloroplast CO<sub>2</sub> and photon flux density at different leaf temperatures of four grapevine cultivars grown in common outdoor conditions.","authors":"Dennis H Greer","doi":"10.1002/pld3.595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Comparative measurements of four <i>Vitis vinifera</i> cultivars were undertaken to assess assimilation tolerance to the high growth temperatures currently pervading Australian and other wine growing regions. The cultivars, cvs. Chardonnay, Merlot, Semillon, and Shiraz, were all grown in common growth conditions, and an hypothesis promulgated genotypic variation in assimilation and in the leaf temperature dependency. Assimilation responses to varying light intensity and to varying chloroplast CO<sub>2</sub> at a range of leaf temperatures (15-45°C) were measured in leaves of each cultivar in mid-summer. Light response curves revealed marked genotype differences in maximum assimilation, but temperature effects also varied. Semillon leaves were most sensitive to temperature, with marked and steep differences in assimilation at different temperatures while Chardonnay and Merlot were least sensitive, with relatively flat responses. There were also marked cultivar differences in response to CO<sub>2</sub> and significant effects of leaf temperature. CO<sub>2</sub>-saturated assimilation varied markedly, with Semillon and Merlot leaves most responsive to temperature, although there were differences in optimum temperatures and maximum rates. Chardonnay leaves remained least tolerant, with lowest rates of assimilation across most temperatures. Assimilation at 45°C also separated the cultivars and two cultivars had higher rates than at 15°C while Chardonnay and Merlot leaves had higher rates at 15°C. There were no cultivar differences in the temperature dependency of Ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) carboxylation, but Semillon had a much steeper temperature dependency on RuBP regeneration than the other cultivars. All these responses confirmed the hypothesis and concluded the high-temperature tolerance of Semillon and Shiraz and the poor adaptability of Chardonnay and possibly Merlot to perform in the current high-temperature growth conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11154808/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pld3.595","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Comparative measurements of four Vitis vinifera cultivars were undertaken to assess assimilation tolerance to the high growth temperatures currently pervading Australian and other wine growing regions. The cultivars, cvs. Chardonnay, Merlot, Semillon, and Shiraz, were all grown in common growth conditions, and an hypothesis promulgated genotypic variation in assimilation and in the leaf temperature dependency. Assimilation responses to varying light intensity and to varying chloroplast CO2 at a range of leaf temperatures (15-45°C) were measured in leaves of each cultivar in mid-summer. Light response curves revealed marked genotype differences in maximum assimilation, but temperature effects also varied. Semillon leaves were most sensitive to temperature, with marked and steep differences in assimilation at different temperatures while Chardonnay and Merlot were least sensitive, with relatively flat responses. There were also marked cultivar differences in response to CO2 and significant effects of leaf temperature. CO2-saturated assimilation varied markedly, with Semillon and Merlot leaves most responsive to temperature, although there were differences in optimum temperatures and maximum rates. Chardonnay leaves remained least tolerant, with lowest rates of assimilation across most temperatures. Assimilation at 45°C also separated the cultivars and two cultivars had higher rates than at 15°C while Chardonnay and Merlot leaves had higher rates at 15°C. There were no cultivar differences in the temperature dependency of Ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) carboxylation, but Semillon had a much steeper temperature dependency on RuBP regeneration than the other cultivars. All these responses confirmed the hypothesis and concluded the high-temperature tolerance of Semillon and Shiraz and the poor adaptability of Chardonnay and possibly Merlot to perform in the current high-temperature growth conditions.

在普通室外条件下生长的四个葡萄栽培品种在不同叶片温度下对叶绿体二氧化碳和光通量密度的光合响应的种内差异。
对四个葡萄栽培品种进行了比较测量,以评估它们对澳大利亚和其他葡萄酒产区目前普遍存在的高生长温度的同化耐受性。这些栽培品种是霞多丽、梅洛、赛美蓉和设拉子均在相同的生长条件下生长,并根据假设得出了同化作用和叶片温度依赖性的基因型差异。在仲夏,测量了各栽培品种叶片对不同光照强度和不同叶绿体 CO2 在一系列叶片温度(15-45°C)下的同化反应。光照响应曲线显示,最大同化量的基因型存在明显差异,但温度效应也各不相同。赛美蓉叶片对温度最敏感,在不同温度下的同化作用差异明显且陡峭,而霞多丽和梅洛对温度最不敏感,反应相对平缓。栽培品种对二氧化碳的反应也有明显差异,叶片温度也有显著影响。二氧化碳饱和同化作用差异明显,赛美蓉和梅洛叶片对温度的反应最为敏感,但在最适温度和最大速率方面存在差异。霞多丽叶片的耐受性仍然最差,在大多数温度下同化率最低。45°C 的同化率也区分了不同的栽培品种,两个栽培品种的同化率高于 15°C 的同化率,而霞多丽和梅洛叶片在 15°C 时的同化率更高。在 1,5-二磷酸核酮糖(RuBP)羧化的温度依赖性方面,各栽培品种之间没有差异,但赛美蓉在 RuBP 再生方面的温度依赖性比其他栽培品种要陡峭得多。所有这些反应都证实了假设,并得出结论:赛美蓉和设拉子耐高温,而霞多丽和梅洛在当前高温生长条件下的适应性较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信