Central corneal thickness in new cases of dry eyes: A case-control study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Rekha Ghimire, Raju Kaiti, Manish Dahal, Sanjay Marasini
{"title":"Central corneal thickness in new cases of dry eyes: A case-control study.","authors":"Rekha Ghimire, Raju Kaiti, Manish Dahal, Sanjay Marasini","doi":"10.1097/OPX.0000000000002128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>Loss of homeostasis and chronic inflammation result in ocular surface damage in dry eyes, which is also associated with corneal thinning in established cases. Yet, the correlation between corneal thickness and new cases of dry eyes remains inadequately supported by evidence.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to compare the central corneal thickness of new cases of dry eyes to that of age- and gender-matched controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 45 dry eye patients were compared with 61 age- and gender-matched non-dry eye individuals. The Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire was used to evaluate symptoms, and the central corneal thickness was measured with a Nidek CEM-530 specular microscope. Patients were grouped based on disease severity (OSDI scores), and the clinical findings were compared between groups for slit-lamp examinations, Schirmer's I test, and tear film breakup time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of patients was 25.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 20.0 to 32.0) and 27.0 (IQR, 20.0 to 32.0) years in the control and dry eye groups, respectively (p=0.63). The median (IQR) values of the OSDI scores, tear film breakup time scores, and Schirmer's test measurements in the control groups were 10.4 (8.3 to 10.4), 12.0 (11.0 to 14.0) seconds, and 16.0 (13.5 to 19.5) mm, respectively, which differed from the dry eye groups (p<0.0001). These values in the dry eye group were 29.1 (25.0 to 39.5), 4.0 (3.0 to 8.0) seconds, and 8.0 (3.5 to 11.0) mm, respectively. Patients with dry eyes had lower central corneal thickness than controls (p<0.01). The mean ± standard deviation central corneal thicknesses in patients with dry eyes and the control group were 520.3 ± 26.8 and 545.3 ± 18.8 μm, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The central corneal thickness in dry eyes was significantly reduced compared with the control group. These findings may be useful in monitoring and managing dry eyes and should be considered in intraocular pressure measurements and refractive surgical procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":19649,"journal":{"name":"Optometry and Vision Science","volume":"101 5","pages":"272-275"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optometry and Vision Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000002128","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Significance: Loss of homeostasis and chronic inflammation result in ocular surface damage in dry eyes, which is also associated with corneal thinning in established cases. Yet, the correlation between corneal thickness and new cases of dry eyes remains inadequately supported by evidence.

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the central corneal thickness of new cases of dry eyes to that of age- and gender-matched controls.

Methods: A total of 45 dry eye patients were compared with 61 age- and gender-matched non-dry eye individuals. The Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire was used to evaluate symptoms, and the central corneal thickness was measured with a Nidek CEM-530 specular microscope. Patients were grouped based on disease severity (OSDI scores), and the clinical findings were compared between groups for slit-lamp examinations, Schirmer's I test, and tear film breakup time.

Results: The median age of patients was 25.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 20.0 to 32.0) and 27.0 (IQR, 20.0 to 32.0) years in the control and dry eye groups, respectively (p=0.63). The median (IQR) values of the OSDI scores, tear film breakup time scores, and Schirmer's test measurements in the control groups were 10.4 (8.3 to 10.4), 12.0 (11.0 to 14.0) seconds, and 16.0 (13.5 to 19.5) mm, respectively, which differed from the dry eye groups (p<0.0001). These values in the dry eye group were 29.1 (25.0 to 39.5), 4.0 (3.0 to 8.0) seconds, and 8.0 (3.5 to 11.0) mm, respectively. Patients with dry eyes had lower central corneal thickness than controls (p<0.01). The mean ± standard deviation central corneal thicknesses in patients with dry eyes and the control group were 520.3 ± 26.8 and 545.3 ± 18.8 μm, respectively.

Conclusions: The central corneal thickness in dry eyes was significantly reduced compared with the control group. These findings may be useful in monitoring and managing dry eyes and should be considered in intraocular pressure measurements and refractive surgical procedures.

新发干眼症病例的中央角膜厚度:病例对照研究
意义重大:眼球失去平衡和慢性炎症会导致干眼症患者眼球表面受损,这也与已确诊病例的角膜变薄有关。目的:本研究旨在比较干眼症新发病例与年龄和性别匹配的对照组的中央角膜厚度:方法:将 45 名干眼症患者与 61 名年龄和性别匹配的非干眼症患者进行比较。采用眼表疾病指数(OSDI)问卷评估症状,并使用 Nidek CEM-530 镜面显微镜测量角膜中央厚度。根据疾病严重程度(OSDI评分)对患者进行分组,并比较各组间裂隙灯检查、席默氏I试验和泪膜破裂时间的临床结果:对照组和干眼症组患者的中位年龄分别为 25.0 岁(四分位距[IQR]为 20.0 至 32.0)和 27.0 岁(四分位距[IQR]为 20.0 至 32.0)(P=0.63)。对照组的OSDI评分、泪膜破裂时间评分和Schirmer试验测量值的中位数(IQR)分别为10.4(8.3至10.4)秒、12.0(11.0至14.0)秒和16.0(13.5至19.5)毫米,与干眼症组不同(P结论:与对照组相比,干眼症组的角膜中央厚度明显减少。这些发现可能有助于监测和管理干眼症,并应在眼压测量和屈光手术过程中加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Optometry and Vision Science
Optometry and Vision Science 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
210
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Optometry and Vision Science is the monthly peer-reviewed scientific publication of the American Academy of Optometry, publishing original research since 1924. Optometry and Vision Science is an internationally recognized source for education and information on current discoveries in optometry, physiological optics, vision science, and related fields. The journal considers original contributions that advance clinical practice, vision science, and public health. Authors should remember that the journal reaches readers worldwide and their submissions should be relevant and of interest to a broad audience. Topical priorities include, but are not limited to: clinical and laboratory research, evidence-based reviews, contact lenses, ocular growth and refractive error development, eye movements, visual function and perception, biology of the eye and ocular disease, epidemiology and public health, biomedical optics and instrumentation, novel and important clinical observations and treatments, and optometric education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信