Predictive Value of Clinical, CSF and Vessel Wall MRI Variables in Diagnosing Primary Angiitis of the CNS.

IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurology. Clinical practice Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-03 DOI:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200321
G Abbas Kharal, Sidonie E Ibrikji, Youssef M Farag, Aaron Shoskes, Matthew P Kiczek, Richa Sheth, Muhammad S Hussain
{"title":"Predictive Value of Clinical, CSF and Vessel Wall MRI Variables in Diagnosing Primary Angiitis of the CNS.","authors":"G Abbas Kharal, Sidonie E Ibrikji, Youssef M Farag, Aaron Shoskes, Matthew P Kiczek, Richa Sheth, Muhammad S Hussain","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Without brain biopsy, there are limited diagnostic predictors to differentiate primary angiitis of the CNS (PACNS) from intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). We examined the utility of clinical, CSF, and quantitative vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging (VWMRI) variables in predicting PACNS from ICAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional design, observational study, we reviewed electronic medical records to identify patients (18 years and older) who presented to our medical center between January 2015 and December 2021 for ischemic stroke due to intracranial vasculopathy. Patients with biopsy-proven PACNS, probable PACNS, or ICAD were included. Patients with secondary CNS vasculitis or no VWMRI data were excluded. On VWMRI, for each patient, a total of 20 vessel wall segments were analyzed for percent concentricity, percent irregularity, and concentricity to eccentricity (C/E) ratios. We also collected several clinical and CSF variables. Using logistic regression models, we assessed the diagnostic value of VWMRI, CSF, and clinical variables in predicting PACNS in patients with biopsy-proven disease. We then performed a sensitivity analysis to assess predictors of biopsy-proven and probable PACNS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two patients with ICAD (54.2%) and 27 patients with PACNS (45.8%) were included. Of the patients with PACNS, 21 (77.8%) were not biopsied and considered probable PACNS. Twenty-four patients with ICAD (75%) and 6 biopsy-proven patients with PACNS (22.2%) showed large vessel involvement and were included in the primary analysis. Encephalopathy (odds ratio [OR], 7.60; 95% CI 1.07-54.09) and seizure (OR 23.00; 95% CI 1.77-298.45) were significantly associated with PACNS. All patients were included in the sensitivity analysis, in which headache significantly predicted PACNS (OR 7.60; 95% CI 1.07-54.09). In the primary analysis, for every 1 white blood cell/µL increase in CSF, there was a 47% higher odds of PACNS (OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.04-2.07). On VWMRI, a C/E ratio >1 (OR 115.00; 95% CI 6.11-2165.95), percent concentricity ≥50% (OR 55.00; 95% CI 4.13-732.71), and percent irregularity <50% (OR 55.00; 95% CI 4.13-732.71) indicated significantly higher odds of PACNS compared with ICAD.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our results suggest that quantitative VWMRI metrics, CSF pleocytosis, and clinical features of encephalopathy, seizure, and headache significantly predict a diagnosis of probable PACNS when compared with ICAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11160479/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology. Clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Without brain biopsy, there are limited diagnostic predictors to differentiate primary angiitis of the CNS (PACNS) from intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). We examined the utility of clinical, CSF, and quantitative vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging (VWMRI) variables in predicting PACNS from ICAD.

Methods: In this cross-sectional design, observational study, we reviewed electronic medical records to identify patients (18 years and older) who presented to our medical center between January 2015 and December 2021 for ischemic stroke due to intracranial vasculopathy. Patients with biopsy-proven PACNS, probable PACNS, or ICAD were included. Patients with secondary CNS vasculitis or no VWMRI data were excluded. On VWMRI, for each patient, a total of 20 vessel wall segments were analyzed for percent concentricity, percent irregularity, and concentricity to eccentricity (C/E) ratios. We also collected several clinical and CSF variables. Using logistic regression models, we assessed the diagnostic value of VWMRI, CSF, and clinical variables in predicting PACNS in patients with biopsy-proven disease. We then performed a sensitivity analysis to assess predictors of biopsy-proven and probable PACNS.

Results: Thirty-two patients with ICAD (54.2%) and 27 patients with PACNS (45.8%) were included. Of the patients with PACNS, 21 (77.8%) were not biopsied and considered probable PACNS. Twenty-four patients with ICAD (75%) and 6 biopsy-proven patients with PACNS (22.2%) showed large vessel involvement and were included in the primary analysis. Encephalopathy (odds ratio [OR], 7.60; 95% CI 1.07-54.09) and seizure (OR 23.00; 95% CI 1.77-298.45) were significantly associated with PACNS. All patients were included in the sensitivity analysis, in which headache significantly predicted PACNS (OR 7.60; 95% CI 1.07-54.09). In the primary analysis, for every 1 white blood cell/µL increase in CSF, there was a 47% higher odds of PACNS (OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.04-2.07). On VWMRI, a C/E ratio >1 (OR 115.00; 95% CI 6.11-2165.95), percent concentricity ≥50% (OR 55.00; 95% CI 4.13-732.71), and percent irregularity <50% (OR 55.00; 95% CI 4.13-732.71) indicated significantly higher odds of PACNS compared with ICAD.

Discussion: Our results suggest that quantitative VWMRI metrics, CSF pleocytosis, and clinical features of encephalopathy, seizure, and headache significantly predict a diagnosis of probable PACNS when compared with ICAD.

临床、脑脊液和血管壁磁共振成像变量在诊断中枢神经系统原发性血管炎中的预测价值
背景和目的:在不进行脑活检的情况下,用于区分中枢神经系统原发性血管炎(PACNS)和颅内动脉粥样硬化性疾病(ICAD)的诊断预测指标非常有限。我们研究了临床、脑脊液和定量血管壁磁共振成像(VWMRI)变量在预测 PACNS 和 ICAD 时的效用:在这项横断面设计的观察性研究中,我们查阅了电子病历,以确定在 2015 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间因颅内血管病变导致缺血性卒中而到我们医疗中心就诊的患者(18 岁及以上)。活组织检查证实患有 PACNS、可能患有 PACNS 或 ICAD 的患者均包括在内。继发性中枢神经系统血管炎或无 VWMRI 数据的患者除外。在 VWMRI 上,我们对每位患者共 20 个血管壁片段进行了同心度百分比、不规则度百分比和同心度与偏心度(C/E)比率分析。我们还收集了一些临床和脑脊液变量。利用逻辑回归模型,我们评估了 VWMRI、CSF 和临床变量在预测活检证实的 PACNS 患者中的诊断价值。然后,我们进行了一项敏感性分析,以评估活检证实的和可能的 PACNS 的预测因素:共纳入 32 名 ICAD 患者(54.2%)和 27 名 PACNS 患者(45.8%)。在 PACNS 患者中,21 例(77.8%)未进行活组织检查,被认为可能患有 PACNS。24 名 ICAD 患者(75%)和 6 名经活检证实的 PACNS 患者(22.2%)出现大血管受累,被纳入主要分析。脑病(几率比 [OR],7.60;95% CI 1.07-54.09)和癫痫发作(OR 23.00;95% CI 1.77-298.45)与 PACNS 有显著相关性。所有患者都纳入了敏感性分析,其中头痛与 PACNS 有明显相关性(OR 7.60;95% CI 1.07-54.09)。在主要分析中,CSF 中的白细胞每增加 1 个/μL,PACNS 的几率就会增加 47%(OR 1.47;95% CI 1.04-2.07)。在 VWMRI 上,C/E 比值>1(OR 115.00;95% CI 6.11-2165.95)、同心度百分比≥50%(OR 55.00;95% CI 4.13-732.71)和不规则度百分比讨论:我们的研究结果表明,与 ICAD 相比,VWMRI 定量指标、CSF 多形性以及脑病、癫痫发作和头痛等临床特征可显著预测可能的 PACNS 诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology. Clinical practice
Neurology. Clinical practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Neurology® Genetics is an online open access journal publishing peer-reviewed reports in the field of neurogenetics. The journal publishes original articles in all areas of neurogenetics including rare and common genetic variations, genotype-phenotype correlations, outlier phenotypes as a result of mutations in known disease genes, and genetic variations with a putative link to diseases. Articles include studies reporting on genetic disease risk, pharmacogenomics, and results of gene-based clinical trials (viral, ASO, etc.). Genetically engineered model systems are not a primary focus of Neurology® Genetics, but studies using model systems for treatment trials, including well-powered studies reporting negative results, are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信