Methods applied to neonatal dried blood spot samples for secondary research purposes: a scoping review.

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Jordan Canning, Rona J Strawbridge, Zosia Miedzybrodzka, Riccardo E Marioni, Mads Melbye, David J Porteous, Matthew E Hurles, Naveed Sattar, Cathie L M Sudlow, Rory Collins, Sandosh Padmanabhan, Jill P Pell
{"title":"Methods applied to neonatal dried blood spot samples for secondary research purposes: a scoping review.","authors":"Jordan Canning, Rona J Strawbridge, Zosia Miedzybrodzka, Riccardo E Marioni, Mads Melbye, David J Porteous, Matthew E Hurles, Naveed Sattar, Cathie L M Sudlow, Rory Collins, Sandosh Padmanabhan, Jill P Pell","doi":"10.1080/10408363.2024.2360996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This scoping review aimed to synthesize the analytical techniques used and methodological limitations encountered when undertaking secondary research using residual neonatal dried blood spot (DBS) samples. Studies that used residual neonatal DBS samples for secondary research (i.e. research not related to newborn screening for inherited genetic and metabolic disorders) were identified from six electronic databases: Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, Medline, PubMed and Scopus. Inclusion was restricted to studies published from 1973 and written in or translated into English that reported the storage, extraction and testing of neonatal DBS samples. Sixty-seven studies were eligible for inclusion. Included studies were predominantly methodological in nature and measured various analytes, including nucleic acids, proteins, metabolites, environmental pollutants, markers of prenatal substance use and medications. Neonatal DBS samples were stored over a range of temperatures (ambient temperature, cold storage or frozen) and durations (two weeks to 40.5 years), both of which impacted the recovery of some analytes, particularly amino acids, antibodies and environmental pollutants. The size of DBS sample used and potential contamination were also cited as methodological limitations. Residual neonatal DBS samples retained by newborn screening programs are a promising resource for secondary research purposes, with many studies reporting the successful measurement of analytes even from neonatal DBS samples stored for long periods of time in suboptimal temperatures and conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10760,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2024.2360996","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This scoping review aimed to synthesize the analytical techniques used and methodological limitations encountered when undertaking secondary research using residual neonatal dried blood spot (DBS) samples. Studies that used residual neonatal DBS samples for secondary research (i.e. research not related to newborn screening for inherited genetic and metabolic disorders) were identified from six electronic databases: Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, Medline, PubMed and Scopus. Inclusion was restricted to studies published from 1973 and written in or translated into English that reported the storage, extraction and testing of neonatal DBS samples. Sixty-seven studies were eligible for inclusion. Included studies were predominantly methodological in nature and measured various analytes, including nucleic acids, proteins, metabolites, environmental pollutants, markers of prenatal substance use and medications. Neonatal DBS samples were stored over a range of temperatures (ambient temperature, cold storage or frozen) and durations (two weeks to 40.5 years), both of which impacted the recovery of some analytes, particularly amino acids, antibodies and environmental pollutants. The size of DBS sample used and potential contamination were also cited as methodological limitations. Residual neonatal DBS samples retained by newborn screening programs are a promising resource for secondary research purposes, with many studies reporting the successful measurement of analytes even from neonatal DBS samples stored for long periods of time in suboptimal temperatures and conditions.

用于新生儿干血斑样本二次研究的方法:范围界定综述。
本范围综述旨在总结利用残留新生儿干血斑(DBS)样本进行二次研究时所使用的分析技术和遇到的方法限制。从六个电子数据库中找出了使用新生儿残留干血斑样本进行二次研究(即与新生儿遗传和代谢疾病筛查无关的研究)的研究:Cochrane Library、Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)、Embase、Medline、PubMed 和 Scopus。纳入的研究仅限于 1973 年以来发表的、用英语撰写或翻译成英语的、报告新生儿 DBS 样本的储存、提取和测试的研究。共有 67 项研究符合纳入条件。所纳入的研究主要是方法学性质的,测量了各种分析物,包括核酸、蛋白质、代谢物、环境污染物、产前药物使用标记物和药物。新生儿 DBS 样本的保存温度(环境温度、冷藏或冷冻)和保存时间(两周到 40.5 年)各不相同,这都会影响某些分析物的回收率,尤其是氨基酸、抗体和环境污染物。使用的 DBS 样本的大小和潜在的污染也被认为是方法学上的局限性。新生儿筛查项目保留的残留新生儿 DBS 样本是一种很有希望用于二次研究的资源,许多研究报告称,即使是在不理想的温度和条件下长期储存的新生儿 DBS 样本也能成功测量出分析物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences publishes comprehensive and high quality review articles in all areas of clinical laboratory science, including clinical biochemistry, hematology, microbiology, pathology, transfusion medicine, genetics, immunology and molecular diagnostics. The reviews critically evaluate the status of current issues in the selected areas, with a focus on clinical laboratory diagnostics and latest advances. The adjective “critical” implies a balanced synthesis of results and conclusions that are frequently contradictory and controversial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信