{"title":"Common misconceptions and good practices in qualitative research in school psychology","authors":"Sujay V. Sabnis , Jennifer R. Wolgemuth","doi":"10.1016/j.jsp.2024.101328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>After a long journey in relative obscurity, qualitative research is being accepted in the field of school psychology. As more school psychology researchers and graduate students adopt it as part of their scholarly endeavors, we reflect on the qualitative research published in school psychology since 2006 in terms of what has been done so far and what can be improved going forward. This act of academic retrospection can strengthen qualitative research in school psychology by helping to identify areas of strength and weakness. We read all qualitative studies published in seven school psychology journals between 2006 and 2021 to understand their methodological character. In Section I, we discuss the methodological trends (e.g., approach to inquiry, data collection methods, data analysis strategies) we found. In Section II, we reflect upon this corpus and identify some common misconceptions about qualitative methodologies that stood out to us. We clarify these misconceptions and highlight some examples of ‘good’ practices in these articles that could be adopted by other researchers. Finally in Section III, we provide some general recommendations about developing school psychologists' understanding of and the ability to conduct qualitative research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48232,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022440524000487","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
After a long journey in relative obscurity, qualitative research is being accepted in the field of school psychology. As more school psychology researchers and graduate students adopt it as part of their scholarly endeavors, we reflect on the qualitative research published in school psychology since 2006 in terms of what has been done so far and what can be improved going forward. This act of academic retrospection can strengthen qualitative research in school psychology by helping to identify areas of strength and weakness. We read all qualitative studies published in seven school psychology journals between 2006 and 2021 to understand their methodological character. In Section I, we discuss the methodological trends (e.g., approach to inquiry, data collection methods, data analysis strategies) we found. In Section II, we reflect upon this corpus and identify some common misconceptions about qualitative methodologies that stood out to us. We clarify these misconceptions and highlight some examples of ‘good’ practices in these articles that could be adopted by other researchers. Finally in Section III, we provide some general recommendations about developing school psychologists' understanding of and the ability to conduct qualitative research.
在经历了相对默默无闻的漫长历程之后,定性研究正在被学校心理学领域所接受。随着越来越多的学校心理学研究人员和研究生将质性研究作为其学术努力的一部分,我们对自 2006 年以来发表的学校心理学质性研究进行了反思,以了解迄今为止已经完成了哪些工作,以及今后可以改进哪些工作。这种学术回顾行为有助于找出学校心理学质性研究的强项和弱项,从而加强学校心理学的质性研究。我们阅读了 2006 至 2021 年间在七种学校心理学期刊上发表的所有定性研究,以了解其方法论特点。在第 I 部分,我们讨论了我们发现的方法论趋势(如探究方法、数据收集方法、数据分析策略)。在第 II 部分中,我们将对这一语料库进行反思,并找出一些关于定性方法论的常见误解。我们将澄清这些误解,并强调这些文章中的一些 "良好 "实践范例,供其他研究人员借鉴。最后,在第 III 部分,我们就培养学校心理学家开展定性研究的理解和能力提出了一些一般性建议。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of School Psychology publishes original empirical articles and critical reviews of the literature on research and practices relevant to psychological and behavioral processes in school settings. JSP presents research on intervention mechanisms and approaches; schooling effects on the development of social, cognitive, mental-health, and achievement-related outcomes; assessment; and consultation. Submissions from a variety of disciplines are encouraged. All manuscripts are read by the Editor and one or more editorial consultants with the intent of providing appropriate and constructive written reviews.