Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of enamel surface roughness and remineralization after interproximal reduction: An in vivo study

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
{"title":"Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of enamel surface roughness and remineralization after interproximal reduction: An in vivo study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.05.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Interproximal reduction (IPR) damages the caries protective superficial layer of the enamel, making the enamel surface prone to caries because of the increase in surface roughness. Remineralizing solutions can help in preventing these undesirable side effects. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effect of nanohydroxyapatite (nHAp) and sodium fluoride (NaF) application on enamel remineralization after IPR and to evaluate changes in surface roughness, composition, and microhardness of the treated enamel.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 25 patients with Angle’s Class I malocclusion<span>, requiring 4 premolar<span> extractions, were selected and randomly divided into 5 groups (n = 5). Group 1 served as the control. In group 2, the extraction of premolars was done immediately after IPR, and in group 3, the extraction of premolars was done 3 months after IPR. In group 4, the extraction of premolars was performed 3 months after IPR with weekly application of nHAp serum. In group 5, the extraction of premolars was performed 3 months after IPR, along with once-a-month application of NaF varnish<span>. The proximal reduction of premolars in all the groups was done using Strauss IPR burs (Strauss Diamond Instruments, Palm Coast, Fla). The extracted teeth were sectioned, and the enamel surfaces were subjected to energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy to evaluate elemental composition. Vicker’s microhardness test was used to evaluate enamel hardness and atomic force microscopy for enamel surface roughness. Descriptive statistics were calculated for the 5 groups using a 1-way analysis of variance, and Tukey’s multiple post-hoc test was used for intergroup comparison.</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Calcium-to-phosphorous ratio, enamel microhardness, and surface roughness were found to be closest to untouched enamel in patients treated with nHAp, followed by patients who were treated with NaF. A lower calcium-to-phosphorous ratio and weakened and roughest enamel surface was seen in teeth, which were extracted immediately after IPR.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Among the remineralizing agents tested, nHAp serum can be recommended for better remineralization of enamel surfaces after IPR.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50806,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889540624002002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Interproximal reduction (IPR) damages the caries protective superficial layer of the enamel, making the enamel surface prone to caries because of the increase in surface roughness. Remineralizing solutions can help in preventing these undesirable side effects. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effect of nanohydroxyapatite (nHAp) and sodium fluoride (NaF) application on enamel remineralization after IPR and to evaluate changes in surface roughness, composition, and microhardness of the treated enamel.

Methods

A total of 25 patients with Angle’s Class I malocclusion, requiring 4 premolar extractions, were selected and randomly divided into 5 groups (n = 5). Group 1 served as the control. In group 2, the extraction of premolars was done immediately after IPR, and in group 3, the extraction of premolars was done 3 months after IPR. In group 4, the extraction of premolars was performed 3 months after IPR with weekly application of nHAp serum. In group 5, the extraction of premolars was performed 3 months after IPR, along with once-a-month application of NaF varnish. The proximal reduction of premolars in all the groups was done using Strauss IPR burs (Strauss Diamond Instruments, Palm Coast, Fla). The extracted teeth were sectioned, and the enamel surfaces were subjected to energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy to evaluate elemental composition. Vicker’s microhardness test was used to evaluate enamel hardness and atomic force microscopy for enamel surface roughness. Descriptive statistics were calculated for the 5 groups using a 1-way analysis of variance, and Tukey’s multiple post-hoc test was used for intergroup comparison.

Results

Calcium-to-phosphorous ratio, enamel microhardness, and surface roughness were found to be closest to untouched enamel in patients treated with nHAp, followed by patients who were treated with NaF. A lower calcium-to-phosphorous ratio and weakened and roughest enamel surface was seen in teeth, which were extracted immediately after IPR.

Conclusions

Among the remineralizing agents tested, nHAp serum can be recommended for better remineralization of enamel surfaces after IPR.

釉质表面粗糙度的定性和定量评估以及近端间磨削后的再矿化:活体研究
简介近端磨削术(IPR)会破坏釉质的龋坏保护表层,使釉质表面粗糙度增加,容易发生龋坏。再矿化溶液有助于防止这些不良副作用。因此,本研究旨在比较纳米羟基磷灰石(nHAp)和氟化钠(NaF)对 IPR 后釉质再矿化的影响,并评估治疗后釉质表面粗糙度、成分和微硬度的变化:选取 25 名需要拔除 4 颗前磨牙的 Angle's I 级错颌畸形患者,随机分为 5 组(n = 5)。第一组为对照组。第 2 组在 IPR 后立即拔除前磨牙,第 3 组在 IPR 后 3 个月拔除前磨牙。第 4 组在 IPR 后 3 个月拔除前磨牙,每周使用 nHAp 血清。第 5 组在 IPR 后 3 个月拔除前磨牙,同时每月涂抹一次 NaF 光油。所有组的前臼齿近端缩小均使用 Strauss IPR 车针(Strauss Diamond Instruments, Palm Coast, Fla)完成。对拔出的牙齿进行切片,并对釉质表面进行能量色散 X 射线光谱分析,以评估元素组成。维氏硬度测试用于评估珐琅质硬度,原子力显微镜用于评估珐琅质表面粗糙度。采用单因素方差分析计算 5 组的描述性统计数字,并采用 Tukey 多重事后检验进行组间比较:结果发现:接受 nHAp 治疗的患者的钙磷比、牙釉质微硬度和表面粗糙度最接近未处理的牙釉质,接受 NaF 治疗的患者次之。在 IPR 后立即拔除的牙齿中,钙磷比更低,釉质表面更薄弱、更粗糙:结论:在测试的再矿化剂中,推荐使用 nHAp 血清,以更好地再矿化 IPR 后的牙釉质表面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
432
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Published for more than 100 years, the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics remains the leading orthodontic resource. It is the official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, the American Board of Orthodontics, and the College of Diplomates of the American Board of Orthodontics. Each month its readers have access to original peer-reviewed articles that examine all phases of orthodontic treatment. Illustrated throughout, the publication includes tables, color photographs, and statistical data. Coverage includes successful diagnostic procedures, imaging techniques, bracket and archwire materials, extraction and impaction concerns, orthognathic surgery, TMJ disorders, removable appliances, and adult therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信