Multidisciplinary re-evaluation of neuropsychiatric events to confirm the neuropsychiatric lupus diagnosis at an Indonesian tertiary hospital.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Riwanti Estiasari, Syairah Banu, Alvina Widhani, Fitri Octaviana, Kartika Maharani, Tiara Aninditha, Muthia Huda Islami, Darma Imran, Diatri Nari Lastri
{"title":"Multidisciplinary re-evaluation of neuropsychiatric events to confirm the neuropsychiatric lupus diagnosis at an Indonesian tertiary hospital.","authors":"Riwanti Estiasari, Syairah Banu, Alvina Widhani, Fitri Octaviana, Kartika Maharani, Tiara Aninditha, Muthia Huda Islami, Darma Imran, Diatri Nari Lastri","doi":"10.1136/lupus-2024-001163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Neuropsychiatric SLE (NPSLE) has a broad spectrum and to date, there is no gold-standard biomarker. The diagnosis relies on clinical assessment, supporting examinations and exclusion of other possible aetiologies. One method that can be used to establish NPSLE is to conduct a re-evaluation by involving several fields of medical science. This study aims to reassess SLE cases with neuropsychiatric (NP) manifestations through multidisciplinary re-evaluation and determine the final diagnosis of NPSLE or non-NPSLE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional study used medical record data from patients with SLE with NP manifestations. Inclusion criteria included patients diagnosed with SLE, who had clinical manifestations of NP and were >18 years old. Multidisciplinary re-evaluation was conducted and agreed upon the diagnosis of NPSLE or non-NPSLE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 94 subjects with a total of 132 NP events consisting of 69 NPSLE and 63 non-NPSLE. After re-evaluating NPSLE events, 33.3% were still concluded to be NPSLE. Meanwhile, from the non-NPSLE group, 22.2% were then declared as NPSLE. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the NPSLE and non-NPSLE groups. The proportion of NP events in both groups was almost the same except for cerebrovascular disease manifestations which were more common in the NPSLE group. Higher Mexican SLE Disease Activity Index scores with (p<0.001) or without NP (p=0.02) were observed in the NPSLE group compared with the non-NPSLE group, as well as higher proportion of active disease (p=0.03), higher anti-double-stranded DNA titres (p<0.001) and lower values of C3 (p=0.018) and C4 (p=0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multidisciplinary re-evaluation can be used as a method to confirm the diagnosis of NPSLE. There is a tendency for overdiagnosis of NPSLE when clinicians are faced with NP events in patients with SLE. Complete clinical and supporting data are needed to determine the final diagnosis of NPSLE.</p>","PeriodicalId":18126,"journal":{"name":"Lupus Science & Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11163663/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lupus Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2024-001163","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Neuropsychiatric SLE (NPSLE) has a broad spectrum and to date, there is no gold-standard biomarker. The diagnosis relies on clinical assessment, supporting examinations and exclusion of other possible aetiologies. One method that can be used to establish NPSLE is to conduct a re-evaluation by involving several fields of medical science. This study aims to reassess SLE cases with neuropsychiatric (NP) manifestations through multidisciplinary re-evaluation and determine the final diagnosis of NPSLE or non-NPSLE.

Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study used medical record data from patients with SLE with NP manifestations. Inclusion criteria included patients diagnosed with SLE, who had clinical manifestations of NP and were >18 years old. Multidisciplinary re-evaluation was conducted and agreed upon the diagnosis of NPSLE or non-NPSLE.

Results: We included 94 subjects with a total of 132 NP events consisting of 69 NPSLE and 63 non-NPSLE. After re-evaluating NPSLE events, 33.3% were still concluded to be NPSLE. Meanwhile, from the non-NPSLE group, 22.2% were then declared as NPSLE. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the NPSLE and non-NPSLE groups. The proportion of NP events in both groups was almost the same except for cerebrovascular disease manifestations which were more common in the NPSLE group. Higher Mexican SLE Disease Activity Index scores with (p<0.001) or without NP (p=0.02) were observed in the NPSLE group compared with the non-NPSLE group, as well as higher proportion of active disease (p=0.03), higher anti-double-stranded DNA titres (p<0.001) and lower values of C3 (p=0.018) and C4 (p=0.001).

Conclusions: Multidisciplinary re-evaluation can be used as a method to confirm the diagnosis of NPSLE. There is a tendency for overdiagnosis of NPSLE when clinicians are faced with NP events in patients with SLE. Complete clinical and supporting data are needed to determine the final diagnosis of NPSLE.

印尼一家三甲医院对神经精神事件进行多学科再评估,以确诊神经精神狼疮。
目的:神经精神系统性红斑狼疮(NPSLE)的发病范围很广,迄今为止还没有金标准生物标志物。诊断依赖于临床评估、辅助检查和排除其他可能的病因。用于确定非系统性红斑狼疮的一种方法是通过多个医学领域的参与进行重新评估。本研究旨在通过多学科重新评估,对有神经精神(NP)表现的系统性红斑狼疮病例进行重新评估,并确定NPSLE或非NPSLE的最终诊断:这项回顾性横断面研究使用了有NP表现的系统性红斑狼疮患者的病历数据。纳入标准包括确诊为系统性红斑狼疮、有非狼疮临床表现且年龄大于18岁的患者。研究人员进行了多学科再评估,并就非系统性红斑狼疮或非系统性红斑狼疮的诊断达成一致:我们共纳入了94名受试者,他们共发生了132起NP事件,其中69起为非NPSLE,63起为非NPSLE。对非淋巴系统性红斑狼疮事件进行重新评估后,33.3%仍被认定为非淋巴系统性红斑狼疮。同时,在非 NPSLE 组中,有 22.2% 被宣布为 NPSLE。NPSLE组和非NPSLE组在人口统计学特征方面没有明显差异。除了脑血管疾病表现在非系统性红斑狼疮组中更为常见外,两组中发生非系统性红斑狼疮事件的比例几乎相同。墨西哥系统性红斑狼疮疾病活动指数(SLE Disease Activity Index)评分越高,非系统性红斑狼疮发病率越高:多学科再评估可作为确诊非系统性红斑狼疮的一种方法。当临床医生面对系统性红斑狼疮患者的NP事件时,有过度诊断NPSLE的倾向。要确定非系统性红斑狼疮的最终诊断,需要完整的临床和辅助数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lupus Science & Medicine
Lupus Science & Medicine RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
88
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Lupus Science & Medicine is a global, peer reviewed, open access online journal that provides a central point for publication of basic, clinical, translational, and epidemiological studies of all aspects of lupus and related diseases. It is the first lupus-specific open access journal in the world and was developed in response to the need for a barrier-free forum for publication of groundbreaking studies in lupus. The journal publishes research on lupus from fields including, but not limited to: rheumatology, dermatology, nephrology, immunology, pediatrics, cardiology, hepatology, pulmonology, obstetrics and gynecology, and psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信