Optimization of Extraction of Four Components from Radix Scrophulariae with Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents and Evaluation of Extract's Antioxidant Activity.

IF 1.5 4区 化学 Q4 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Ping Huang, Yanxia Zhou, Fei Ruan, Jianyu Sun, Jinglin Shen, Hongmei Chen
{"title":"Optimization of Extraction of Four Components from Radix Scrophulariae with Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents and Evaluation of Extract's Antioxidant Activity.","authors":"Ping Huang, Yanxia Zhou, Fei Ruan, Jianyu Sun, Jinglin Shen, Hongmei Chen","doi":"10.1093/chromsci/bmae037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this research, eight natural deep eutectic solvents (NaDESs) consisting of food-grade ingredients were screened for the extraction of four bioactive compounds (acteoside, cinnamic acid, angoroside C and harpagoside) from radix scrophulariae (RS). Among these NaDESs, Proline-Glycerol NaDES with higher comprehensive score was selected. The Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) was applied to calculate the information entropy and the weight of indexes, and figured out a comprehensive score. The weights of acteoside, cinnamic acid, angoroside C and harpagoside were 0.369, 0.172, 0.241 and 0.218, respectively. Response surface methodology (RSM) mathematical model was used to optimize the extraction parameters. The optimal extraction parameters were as follows: extraction time with 42.21 min, NaDES concentration with 52.89%, solid-to-liquid ratio with 1 : 37.05 g/mL and the predicted value of comprehensive score was 0.885. Under the optimal condition, the comprehensive score was 0.903 ± 0.005. Finally, the antioxidant activity experiment revealed that the 1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl · radical scavenging activity and hydroxyl radical scavenging activity of the extract at 2.0 mg/mL and 1.5 mg/mL were approximately equal to those of ascorbic acid, respectively. The results showed that the extraction condition optimized by RSM combined with CRITIC was reasonable and dependable, and the extract of radix scrophulariae exhibited good antioxidant activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":15430,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chromatographic science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chromatographic science","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/bmae037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this research, eight natural deep eutectic solvents (NaDESs) consisting of food-grade ingredients were screened for the extraction of four bioactive compounds (acteoside, cinnamic acid, angoroside C and harpagoside) from radix scrophulariae (RS). Among these NaDESs, Proline-Glycerol NaDES with higher comprehensive score was selected. The Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) was applied to calculate the information entropy and the weight of indexes, and figured out a comprehensive score. The weights of acteoside, cinnamic acid, angoroside C and harpagoside were 0.369, 0.172, 0.241 and 0.218, respectively. Response surface methodology (RSM) mathematical model was used to optimize the extraction parameters. The optimal extraction parameters were as follows: extraction time with 42.21 min, NaDES concentration with 52.89%, solid-to-liquid ratio with 1 : 37.05 g/mL and the predicted value of comprehensive score was 0.885. Under the optimal condition, the comprehensive score was 0.903 ± 0.005. Finally, the antioxidant activity experiment revealed that the 1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl · radical scavenging activity and hydroxyl radical scavenging activity of the extract at 2.0 mg/mL and 1.5 mg/mL were approximately equal to those of ascorbic acid, respectively. The results showed that the extraction condition optimized by RSM combined with CRITIC was reasonable and dependable, and the extract of radix scrophulariae exhibited good antioxidant activity.

用天然深共晶溶剂优化萃取樟芝中的四种成分并评估萃取物的抗氧化活性
本研究筛选了八种由食品级成分组成的天然深共晶溶剂(NaDESs),用于从樟芝(RS)中提取四种生物活性化合物(放线菌苷、肉桂酸、血管苷 C 和哈巴苷)。在这些 NaDES 中,脯氨酸-甘油 NaDES 的综合得分较高。应用 "标准重要性与标准间相关性"(CRITIC)计算信息熵和指标权重,得出综合得分。结果表明,猕猴桃苷、肉桂酸、血管苷 C 和哈巴苷的权重分别为 0.369、0.172、0.241 和 0.218。采用响应面法(RSM)数学模型对提取参数进行了优化。最佳萃取参数为:萃取时间为 42.21 分钟,NaDES 浓度为 52.89%,固液比为 1 : 37.05 g/mL,综合得分预测值为 0.885。在最佳条件下,综合得分为 0.903 ± 0.005。最后,抗氧化活性实验表明,在 2.0 毫克/毫升和 1.5 毫克/毫升条件下,提取物的 1,1-二苯基-2-苦基肼自由基清除活性和羟自由基清除活性分别与抗坏血酸大致相当。结果表明,RSM结合CRITIC优化的提取条件合理可靠,蟾酥提取物具有良好的抗氧化活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
94
审稿时长
5.6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chromatographic Science is devoted to the dissemination of information concerning all methods of chromatographic analysis. The standard manuscript is a description of recent original research that covers any or all phases of a specific separation problem, principle, or method. Manuscripts which have a high degree of novelty and fundamental significance to the field of separation science are particularly encouraged. It is expected the authors will clearly state in the Introduction how their method compares in some markedly new and improved way to previous published related methods. Analytical performance characteristics of new methods including sensitivity, tested limits of detection or quantification, accuracy, precision, and specificity should be provided. Manuscripts which describe a straightforward extension of a known analytical method or an application to a previously analyzed and/or uncomplicated sample matrix will not normally be reviewed favorably. Manuscripts in which mass spectrometry is the dominant analytical method and chromatography is of marked secondary importance may be declined.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信