Differential expression of epidermal growth factor receptor in various pathological types of salivary gland cancers

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Hajime Fujiwara , Yoshinori Kodama , Hikari Shimoda , Masanori Teshima , Hirotaka Shinomiya , Ken-ichi Nibu
{"title":"Differential expression of epidermal growth factor receptor in various pathological types of salivary gland cancers","authors":"Hajime Fujiwara ,&nbsp;Yoshinori Kodama ,&nbsp;Hikari Shimoda ,&nbsp;Masanori Teshima ,&nbsp;Hirotaka Shinomiya ,&nbsp;Ken-ichi Nibu","doi":"10.1016/j.anl.2024.05.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>While several studies reported epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression in salivary gland cancer (SGC), results varied due to a lack of unified definition of EGFR positivity. In this study, we assessed the EGFR expression level using both EGFR positive score and cumulative EGFR score in the patients with SGC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Between January 2010 and April 2021, 102 patients with SGC who underwent surgical resection were reviewed retrospectively by immunohistochemistry. The membrane staining intensity was scored as follows: no staining (0), weak staining (1+), intermediate staining (2+), and strong staining (3+). The cumulative EGFR score was determined on a continuous scale of 0–300 using the formula:1 × (1+: percentage of weakly stained cells) + 2 × (2+: percentage of moderately stained cells) + 3 × (3+: percentage of strongly stained cells).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>EGFR expression in SGC varied widely even among the same as well as different histopathological types. The average EGFR positive scores were 46.0 %, 55.7 %, 51.6 %, 1.0 %, 26.8 %, 50 %, and 76.8 % for mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC), salivary duct carcinoma (SDC), adenoid cystic carcinoma (AdCC), acinic cell carcinoma (AcCC), adenocarcinoma NOS (ACNOS), carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma (CAexPA), and squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC), respectively. The average cumulative EGFR scores were 82, 91, 80, 1, 52, 93, and 185 for MEC, SDC, AdCC, AcCC, ACNOS, CAexPA, and SqCC, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>EGFR positive scores and cumulative EGFR scores in SGCs varied among the various histological types, and even in the same histological type. These scores may predict the clinical outcome of SGC treated with EGFR-targeting therapies, such as head and neck photoimmunotherapy, and need to be evaluated in future studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55627,"journal":{"name":"Auris Nasus Larynx","volume":"51 4","pages":"Pages 755-760"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auris Nasus Larynx","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0385814624000671","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

While several studies reported epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression in salivary gland cancer (SGC), results varied due to a lack of unified definition of EGFR positivity. In this study, we assessed the EGFR expression level using both EGFR positive score and cumulative EGFR score in the patients with SGC.

Methods

Between January 2010 and April 2021, 102 patients with SGC who underwent surgical resection were reviewed retrospectively by immunohistochemistry. The membrane staining intensity was scored as follows: no staining (0), weak staining (1+), intermediate staining (2+), and strong staining (3+). The cumulative EGFR score was determined on a continuous scale of 0–300 using the formula:1 × (1+: percentage of weakly stained cells) + 2 × (2+: percentage of moderately stained cells) + 3 × (3+: percentage of strongly stained cells).

Results

EGFR expression in SGC varied widely even among the same as well as different histopathological types. The average EGFR positive scores were 46.0 %, 55.7 %, 51.6 %, 1.0 %, 26.8 %, 50 %, and 76.8 % for mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC), salivary duct carcinoma (SDC), adenoid cystic carcinoma (AdCC), acinic cell carcinoma (AcCC), adenocarcinoma NOS (ACNOS), carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma (CAexPA), and squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC), respectively. The average cumulative EGFR scores were 82, 91, 80, 1, 52, 93, and 185 for MEC, SDC, AdCC, AcCC, ACNOS, CAexPA, and SqCC, respectively.

Conclusions

EGFR positive scores and cumulative EGFR scores in SGCs varied among the various histological types, and even in the same histological type. These scores may predict the clinical outcome of SGC treated with EGFR-targeting therapies, such as head and neck photoimmunotherapy, and need to be evaluated in future studies.

表皮生长因子受体在不同病理类型唾液腺癌中的差异表达
目的虽然有多项研究报道了唾液腺癌(SGC)中表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)的表达情况,但由于缺乏对EGFR阳性的统一定义,结果各不相同。方法在2010年1月至2021年4月期间,对102例接受手术切除的SGC患者进行了免疫组化回顾性研究。膜染色强度评分如下:无染色(0)、弱染色(1+)、中度染色(2+)和强染色(3+)。表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)的累积得分按 0-300 连续计分,计算公式为:1 ×(1+:弱染色细胞的百分比)+ 2 ×(2+:中度染色细胞的百分比)+ 3 ×(3+:强染色细胞的百分比)。平均 EGFR 阳性率分别为 46.0%、55.7%、51.6%、1.0%、26.8%、50% 和 76.8%。粘液表皮样癌(MEC)、唾液腺导管癌(SDC)、腺样囊性癌(AdCC)、针状细胞癌(AcCC)、腺癌NOS(ACNOS)、多形性腺瘤癌(CAexPA)和鳞状细胞癌(SqCC)的平均表皮生长因子受体阳性率分别为46.0%、55.7%、51.6%、1.0%、26.8%、50%和76.8%。MEC、SDC、AdCC、AcCC、ACNOS、CAexPA和SqCC的平均累积EGFR评分分别为82、91、80、1、52、93和185。这些评分可预测头颈部光免疫疗法等表皮生长因子受体靶向疗法治疗的SGC的临床结果,需要在今后的研究中进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Auris Nasus Larynx
Auris Nasus Larynx 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
169
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: The international journal Auris Nasus Larynx provides the opportunity for rapid, carefully reviewed publications concerning the fundamental and clinical aspects of otorhinolaryngology and related fields. This includes otology, neurotology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, allergology, head and neck medicine and oncologic surgery, maxillofacial and plastic surgery, audiology, speech science. Original papers, short communications and original case reports can be submitted. Reviews on recent developments are invited regularly and Letters to the Editor commenting on papers or any aspect of Auris Nasus Larynx are welcomed. Founded in 1973 and previously published by the Society for Promotion of International Otorhinolaryngology, the journal is now the official English-language journal of the Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Society of Japan, Inc. The aim of its new international Editorial Board is to make Auris Nasus Larynx an international forum for high quality research and clinical sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信