{"title":"Differential expression of epidermal growth factor receptor in various pathological types of salivary gland cancers","authors":"Hajime Fujiwara , Yoshinori Kodama , Hikari Shimoda , Masanori Teshima , Hirotaka Shinomiya , Ken-ichi Nibu","doi":"10.1016/j.anl.2024.05.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>While several studies reported epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression in salivary gland cancer (SGC), results varied due to a lack of unified definition of EGFR positivity. In this study, we assessed the EGFR expression level using both EGFR positive score and cumulative EGFR score in the patients with SGC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Between January 2010 and April 2021, 102 patients with SGC who underwent surgical resection were reviewed retrospectively by immunohistochemistry. The membrane staining intensity was scored as follows: no staining (0), weak staining (1+), intermediate staining (2+), and strong staining (3+). The cumulative EGFR score was determined on a continuous scale of 0–300 using the formula:1 × (1+: percentage of weakly stained cells) + 2 × (2+: percentage of moderately stained cells) + 3 × (3+: percentage of strongly stained cells).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>EGFR expression in SGC varied widely even among the same as well as different histopathological types. The average EGFR positive scores were 46.0 %, 55.7 %, 51.6 %, 1.0 %, 26.8 %, 50 %, and 76.8 % for mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC), salivary duct carcinoma (SDC), adenoid cystic carcinoma (AdCC), acinic cell carcinoma (AcCC), adenocarcinoma NOS (ACNOS), carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma (CAexPA), and squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC), respectively. The average cumulative EGFR scores were 82, 91, 80, 1, 52, 93, and 185 for MEC, SDC, AdCC, AcCC, ACNOS, CAexPA, and SqCC, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>EGFR positive scores and cumulative EGFR scores in SGCs varied among the various histological types, and even in the same histological type. These scores may predict the clinical outcome of SGC treated with EGFR-targeting therapies, such as head and neck photoimmunotherapy, and need to be evaluated in future studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55627,"journal":{"name":"Auris Nasus Larynx","volume":"51 4","pages":"Pages 755-760"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auris Nasus Larynx","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0385814624000671","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
While several studies reported epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression in salivary gland cancer (SGC), results varied due to a lack of unified definition of EGFR positivity. In this study, we assessed the EGFR expression level using both EGFR positive score and cumulative EGFR score in the patients with SGC.
Methods
Between January 2010 and April 2021, 102 patients with SGC who underwent surgical resection were reviewed retrospectively by immunohistochemistry. The membrane staining intensity was scored as follows: no staining (0), weak staining (1+), intermediate staining (2+), and strong staining (3+). The cumulative EGFR score was determined on a continuous scale of 0–300 using the formula:1 × (1+: percentage of weakly stained cells) + 2 × (2+: percentage of moderately stained cells) + 3 × (3+: percentage of strongly stained cells).
Results
EGFR expression in SGC varied widely even among the same as well as different histopathological types. The average EGFR positive scores were 46.0 %, 55.7 %, 51.6 %, 1.0 %, 26.8 %, 50 %, and 76.8 % for mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC), salivary duct carcinoma (SDC), adenoid cystic carcinoma (AdCC), acinic cell carcinoma (AcCC), adenocarcinoma NOS (ACNOS), carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma (CAexPA), and squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC), respectively. The average cumulative EGFR scores were 82, 91, 80, 1, 52, 93, and 185 for MEC, SDC, AdCC, AcCC, ACNOS, CAexPA, and SqCC, respectively.
Conclusions
EGFR positive scores and cumulative EGFR scores in SGCs varied among the various histological types, and even in the same histological type. These scores may predict the clinical outcome of SGC treated with EGFR-targeting therapies, such as head and neck photoimmunotherapy, and need to be evaluated in future studies.
期刊介绍:
The international journal Auris Nasus Larynx provides the opportunity for rapid, carefully reviewed publications concerning the fundamental and clinical aspects of otorhinolaryngology and related fields. This includes otology, neurotology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, allergology, head and neck medicine and oncologic surgery, maxillofacial and plastic surgery, audiology, speech science.
Original papers, short communications and original case reports can be submitted. Reviews on recent developments are invited regularly and Letters to the Editor commenting on papers or any aspect of Auris Nasus Larynx are welcomed.
Founded in 1973 and previously published by the Society for Promotion of International Otorhinolaryngology, the journal is now the official English-language journal of the Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Society of Japan, Inc. The aim of its new international Editorial Board is to make Auris Nasus Larynx an international forum for high quality research and clinical sciences.