Fire season matters for midstory hardwood control: Impacts of fire season and firing technique on plant communities

IF 8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Luke Resop, Steve Demarais, Bronson K. Strickland, Raymond B. Iglay
{"title":"Fire season matters for midstory hardwood control: Impacts of fire season and firing technique on plant communities","authors":"Luke Resop,&nbsp;Steve Demarais,&nbsp;Bronson K. Strickland,&nbsp;Raymond B. Iglay","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the southeastern USA<strong>,</strong> lack of historical fire regimes often leads to hardwood encroachment into early successional plant communities and managed pine stands, reducing wildlife value and timber yields. Land managers lack information on how firing technique interacts with fire season to influence plant communities. We designed an experiment to quantify these interactions in east-central Mississippi with pairs of 4 m × 8 m plots randomly assigned a backing and heading fire in each of three seasons: February (Feb), May–June (May/Jun), and September–October (Sep/Oct). We used thermocouples to monitor fire temperature and tagged midstory trees to monitor response. We lit heading fires with an 18–25 kph wind generated by a backpack blower and backing fires into the ambient wind. Despite backing fires producing longer residence times than heading fires and raising temperature above the lethal threshold of 60 °C an average of 54 s longer, firing technique did not influence midstory response one growing season post-fire. Backing and heading fires produced similar maximum temperatures. For both firing techniques, May/Jun resulted in the highest midstory mortality rates which were 3-fold greater than Sep/Oct and 4-fold greater than Feb. Among all three fire seasons, trees with a 2.5 cm diameter at breast height (DBH) had approximately a 75% chance of top-kill which decreased to &lt;20% as trees approached 6.5 cm DBH. We found no effects of fire season on fire temperature, rate of spread, flame height, or percent crown scorch. We found no significant interactions between fire season and firing technique. Understory analysis revealed Sep/Oct produced the greatest increase in forb coverage, May/Jun resulted in the most grass coverage, and Feb produced the most brambles (<em>Rubus</em> spp.). On sites with similar species, weather, and fuel conditions to ours, land managers should emphasize fire season over firing technique for midstory control and understory manipulation. Where midstory hardwood control with fire is a priority, fire return intervals should be frequent enough to prevent trees from exceeding 2.5 cm DBH to avoid trees escaping fire's reach. These data can help managers reduce midstory competition with crop trees and promote understory development for wildlife.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"363 ","pages":"Article 121297"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479724012830/pdfft?md5=a07067d05e7e65e54c0102518978fed8&pid=1-s2.0-S0301479724012830-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479724012830","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the southeastern USA, lack of historical fire regimes often leads to hardwood encroachment into early successional plant communities and managed pine stands, reducing wildlife value and timber yields. Land managers lack information on how firing technique interacts with fire season to influence plant communities. We designed an experiment to quantify these interactions in east-central Mississippi with pairs of 4 m × 8 m plots randomly assigned a backing and heading fire in each of three seasons: February (Feb), May–June (May/Jun), and September–October (Sep/Oct). We used thermocouples to monitor fire temperature and tagged midstory trees to monitor response. We lit heading fires with an 18–25 kph wind generated by a backpack blower and backing fires into the ambient wind. Despite backing fires producing longer residence times than heading fires and raising temperature above the lethal threshold of 60 °C an average of 54 s longer, firing technique did not influence midstory response one growing season post-fire. Backing and heading fires produced similar maximum temperatures. For both firing techniques, May/Jun resulted in the highest midstory mortality rates which were 3-fold greater than Sep/Oct and 4-fold greater than Feb. Among all three fire seasons, trees with a 2.5 cm diameter at breast height (DBH) had approximately a 75% chance of top-kill which decreased to <20% as trees approached 6.5 cm DBH. We found no effects of fire season on fire temperature, rate of spread, flame height, or percent crown scorch. We found no significant interactions between fire season and firing technique. Understory analysis revealed Sep/Oct produced the greatest increase in forb coverage, May/Jun resulted in the most grass coverage, and Feb produced the most brambles (Rubus spp.). On sites with similar species, weather, and fuel conditions to ours, land managers should emphasize fire season over firing technique for midstory control and understory manipulation. Where midstory hardwood control with fire is a priority, fire return intervals should be frequent enough to prevent trees from exceeding 2.5 cm DBH to avoid trees escaping fire's reach. These data can help managers reduce midstory competition with crop trees and promote understory development for wildlife.

火灾季节对中层硬木控制很重要:放火季节和放火技术对植物群落的影响
在美国东南部,由于历史上缺乏防火制度,硬木往往会蚕食早期演替植物群落和受管理的松林,从而降低野生动植物的价值和木材产量。土地管理者缺乏有关燃烧技术如何与火灾季节相互作用以影响植物群落的信息。我们在密西西比州中东部设计了一项实验,在三个季节中的每个季节随机分配一对 4 m × 8 m 的地块,分别进行背烧和顶烧,以量化这些相互作用:分别在二月(2 月)、五月至六月(5 月/6 月)和九月至十月(9 月/10 月)进行。我们使用热电偶监测火温,并对中层树木进行标记以监测反应。我们在背负式鼓风机产生的每小时 18-25 千米的风力下点火,在环境风力下点火。尽管背风点火比迎风点火产生更长的停留时间,并且使温度高于致命阈值 60 °C 的时间平均延长了 54 秒,但点火技术并不影响中层树木在火后一个生长季的反应。背烧和顶烧产生的最高温度相似。在所有三个火灾季节中,胸径(DBH)为 2.5 厘米的树木顶端死亡的几率约为 75%,当树木胸径(DBH)接近 6.5 厘米时,顶端死亡的几率降至 20%。我们没有发现火灾季节对火灾温度、蔓延速度、火焰高度或树冠烧焦百分比有任何影响。我们没有发现火灾季节与燃烧技术之间有明显的交互作用。林下分析表明,9 月/10 月草本植物覆盖率增幅最大,5 月/6 月草本植物覆盖率最高,2 月灌木丛(Rubus spp.)最多。在物种、天气和燃料条件与我们类似的地点,土地管理者应在中层控制和林下控制方面强调火烧季节而非火烧技术。在中层硬木控制以火烧为主的地方,火烧的间隔时间应足够频繁,以防止树木的DBH超过2.5厘米,从而避免树木逃离火烧范围。这些数据可以帮助管理人员减少中层林木与作物树木的竞争,并促进林下野生动物的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信