Capturing longer term surgical outcome measures as part of routine care of breast cancer patients

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Astrid E. Leusink , Amy R. Godden , Nihal Yildirim , Antonia Randawa , Rebekah Law , Jennifer E. Rusby
{"title":"Capturing longer term surgical outcome measures as part of routine care of breast cancer patients","authors":"Astrid E. Leusink ,&nbsp;Amy R. Godden ,&nbsp;Nihal Yildirim ,&nbsp;Antonia Randawa ,&nbsp;Rebekah Law ,&nbsp;Jennifer E. Rusby","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2024.103758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The transition away from routine clinical follow up after breast cancer towards imaging surveillance and patient-initiated contact limits opportunities for patients and doctors to communicate about the long-term effects of treatment. The ABS oncoplastic guidelines (2021) recommend that post-operative 2D images and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) are routinely collected but give no guidance as to how best to implement this.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>From December 2019 until March 2024, women due for their year 3 or 5 surveillance mammogram at The Royal Marsden Sutton site were invited to complete a BREAST-Q questionnaire and attend medical photography. Panel assessment of photographs was undertaken. Results were presented to the oncoplastic MDT, including summary PROMs and illustrative case presentations. Free-text comments were shared with the relevant teams. Associations between demographic or clinic-pathological factors and uptake were investigated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 1211 women invited, 246 patients (20.3 %) completed BREAST-Q questionnaires, 182 (15.0 %) attended for medical photography and 114 (9.4 %) completed both. Uptake was not associated with age, ethnicity or surgical factors but patients with higher BMI were less likely to respond to the questionnaire. Patients who had undergone complex oncoplastic procedures were more likely to respond than those who had simple procedures. Patient-reported outcome results were in line with the published literature.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Reviewing images with their paired PROMs and discussing free-text feedback was instructive for the team. Work is needed to identify barriers to patient participation and improve uptake to be representative of the overall patient population. Quantifying appearance in photographs would help summarise aesthetic outcome data.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 103758"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977624000894/pdfft?md5=55405325370c3ad8c79e496ab2237601&pid=1-s2.0-S0960977624000894-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977624000894","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The transition away from routine clinical follow up after breast cancer towards imaging surveillance and patient-initiated contact limits opportunities for patients and doctors to communicate about the long-term effects of treatment. The ABS oncoplastic guidelines (2021) recommend that post-operative 2D images and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) are routinely collected but give no guidance as to how best to implement this.

Methods

From December 2019 until March 2024, women due for their year 3 or 5 surveillance mammogram at The Royal Marsden Sutton site were invited to complete a BREAST-Q questionnaire and attend medical photography. Panel assessment of photographs was undertaken. Results were presented to the oncoplastic MDT, including summary PROMs and illustrative case presentations. Free-text comments were shared with the relevant teams. Associations between demographic or clinic-pathological factors and uptake were investigated.

Results

Of the 1211 women invited, 246 patients (20.3 %) completed BREAST-Q questionnaires, 182 (15.0 %) attended for medical photography and 114 (9.4 %) completed both. Uptake was not associated with age, ethnicity or surgical factors but patients with higher BMI were less likely to respond to the questionnaire. Patients who had undergone complex oncoplastic procedures were more likely to respond than those who had simple procedures. Patient-reported outcome results were in line with the published literature.

Conclusion

Reviewing images with their paired PROMs and discussing free-text feedback was instructive for the team. Work is needed to identify barriers to patient participation and improve uptake to be representative of the overall patient population. Quantifying appearance in photographs would help summarise aesthetic outcome data.

作为乳腺癌患者常规护理的一部分,获取较长期的手术疗效指标
导言乳腺癌术后常规临床随访向影像监测和患者主动联系过渡,限制了患者和医生就治疗的长期效果进行交流的机会。ABS 肿瘤整形指南(2021 年)建议常规收集术后 2D 图像和患者报告结果 (PROM),但没有就如何最好地实施该指南提供指导。方法从 2019 年 12 月到 2024 年 3 月,皇家马斯登萨顿医院邀请应进行第 3 年或第 5 年乳房 X 线照相监测的女性填写 BREAST-Q 问卷并参加医学摄影。小组对照片进行评估。结果提交给肿瘤整形 MDT,包括 PROMs 摘要和说明性病例介绍。自由文本评论与相关小组共享。结果 在受邀的 1211 名妇女中,246 名患者(20.3%)填写了 BREAST-Q 问卷,182 名患者(15.0%)接受了医学摄影,114 名患者(9.4%)同时完成了这两项工作。问卷接受率与年龄、种族或手术因素无关,但体重指数(BMI)较高的患者不太可能回答问卷。接受过复杂肿瘤整形手术的患者比接受过简单手术的患者更有可能回答问卷。患者报告的结果与已发表的文献一致。我们需要努力找出患者参与的障碍,提高患者的参与率,使其能够代表整个患者群体。对照片中的外观进行量化将有助于总结美学效果数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Breast
Breast 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
165
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Breast is an international, multidisciplinary journal for researchers and clinicians, which focuses on translational and clinical research for the advancement of breast cancer prevention, diagnosis and treatment of all stages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信