Influence of Different Build Directions on the Fracture Load and Surface Roughness of Additively Manufactured Three-Unit Provisional Restorations: An In Vitro Study.
{"title":"Influence of Different Build Directions on the Fracture Load and Surface Roughness of Additively Manufactured Three-Unit Provisional Restorations: An In Vitro Study.","authors":"Shubhi Sahni, Pragati Kaurani, Shweta Bhambhu, Anuja Yadav","doi":"10.11607/ijp.8813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the influence of 0-, 45-, and 90-degree build directions on the fracture load and surface roughness of additively manufactured three-unit fixed provisional restorations and to compare the additively manufactured provisionals to provisionals fabricated using conventional methods.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Mandibular typodont right second molars and premolars were prepared for a missing mandibular first molar to receive a three-unit fixed partial denture. For six groups of 10 samples each, three-unit provisionals were fabricated using additive manufacturing at 0, 45, and 90 degrees; heat polymerized PMMA; autopolymerizing resin; and bis-acryl composites resins-and tested for fracture load and surface roughness. One-way ANOVA and Tukey tests were used to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For fracture load, the lowest mean value was for autopolymerizing bis-acryl resin (464.9 N), and the highest value was for additive manufacturing at 0 degrees (596 N). Surface roughness values were lowest for heat-polymerized PMMA (0.132 µm), and the highest value was for autopolymerizing PMMA (0.836 µm). Significant differences were found between the three build directions for fracture load and surface roughness (P = .001); in all pairwise comparisons except between 0 and 90 degrees (P = .502) for fracture load; and between all three build directions for surface roughness (P = .01). Compared to other provisional materials, a significant difference (P = .001) was observed between all groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Build direction affected the mechanical properties of additively manufactured three-unit provisionals, with provisionals printed at 0 degrees showing the highest fracture load and lowest surface roughness. Compared to other provisional materials, additively manufactured three-unit provisionals printed at 0 degrees also showed the highest fracture load, with surface roughness similar to heat-polymerized provisionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"307-314"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the influence of 0-, 45-, and 90-degree build directions on the fracture load and surface roughness of additively manufactured three-unit fixed provisional restorations and to compare the additively manufactured provisionals to provisionals fabricated using conventional methods.
Materials and methods: Mandibular typodont right second molars and premolars were prepared for a missing mandibular first molar to receive a three-unit fixed partial denture. For six groups of 10 samples each, three-unit provisionals were fabricated using additive manufacturing at 0, 45, and 90 degrees; heat polymerized PMMA; autopolymerizing resin; and bis-acryl composites resins-and tested for fracture load and surface roughness. One-way ANOVA and Tukey tests were used to analyze the data.
Results: For fracture load, the lowest mean value was for autopolymerizing bis-acryl resin (464.9 N), and the highest value was for additive manufacturing at 0 degrees (596 N). Surface roughness values were lowest for heat-polymerized PMMA (0.132 µm), and the highest value was for autopolymerizing PMMA (0.836 µm). Significant differences were found between the three build directions for fracture load and surface roughness (P = .001); in all pairwise comparisons except between 0 and 90 degrees (P = .502) for fracture load; and between all three build directions for surface roughness (P = .01). Compared to other provisional materials, a significant difference (P = .001) was observed between all groups.
Conclusions: Build direction affected the mechanical properties of additively manufactured three-unit provisionals, with provisionals printed at 0 degrees showing the highest fracture load and lowest surface roughness. Compared to other provisional materials, additively manufactured three-unit provisionals printed at 0 degrees also showed the highest fracture load, with surface roughness similar to heat-polymerized provisionals.