Influence of Different Build Directions on the Fracture Load and Surface Roughness of Additively Manufactured Three-unit Provisional Restoration and Comparison with Conventional Methods of Provisional Fabrication.

Shubhi Sahni, Pragati Kaurani, Shweta Bhambhu, Anuja Yadav
{"title":"Influence of Different Build Directions on the Fracture Load and Surface Roughness of Additively Manufactured Three-unit Provisional Restoration and Comparison with Conventional Methods of Provisional Fabrication.","authors":"Shubhi Sahni, Pragati Kaurani, Shweta Bhambhu, Anuja Yadav","doi":"10.11607/ijp.8813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the influence of 0, 45 and 90 degrees build direction on fracture load and surface roughness of additively manufactured three-unit fixed provisional restoration, and to compare with provisionals fabricated using conventional materials.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Mandibular typodont right second molar and premolar were prepared for missing mandibular first molar to receive three-unit fixed partial denture. Six groups of 10 samples each, 3-unit provisionals were fabricated using additional manufacturing at 0,45 and 90 degrees, heat polymerized polymethyl methacrylate, auto polymerizing resin and bis-acryl composites resins and tested for fracture load and surface roughness. One way ANOVA and Tukey tests were used to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For fracture load, lowest mean value was obtained for auto polymerizing bis-acrylic resin (464.9N) and highest value for 0 degree (596 N), while surface roughness values were lowest for heat polymerized polymethyl methacrylate (0.132μm), and the highest for auto polymerizing polymethyl methacrylate (0.836 μm). Significant differences were obtained between three build directions for fracture load and surface roughness (p=0.001); in all pairwise comparisons except between 0 and 90 degrees (p=0.502) for fracture load; and between all three build directions for surface roughness (p=0.01). On comparing with other provisional materials, significant difference (p=0.001) was observed between all groups. Conclusion- Build direction affected the mechanical properties of additively manufactured three-unit provisionals with 0 degree printed provisionals showing highest fracture load and lowest surface roughness. On comparing with other provisional materials, 0 degree showed highest fracture load, with surface roughness similar to heat polymerized provisionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the influence of 0, 45 and 90 degrees build direction on fracture load and surface roughness of additively manufactured three-unit fixed provisional restoration, and to compare with provisionals fabricated using conventional materials.

Material and methods: Mandibular typodont right second molar and premolar were prepared for missing mandibular first molar to receive three-unit fixed partial denture. Six groups of 10 samples each, 3-unit provisionals were fabricated using additional manufacturing at 0,45 and 90 degrees, heat polymerized polymethyl methacrylate, auto polymerizing resin and bis-acryl composites resins and tested for fracture load and surface roughness. One way ANOVA and Tukey tests were used to analyze the data.

Results: For fracture load, lowest mean value was obtained for auto polymerizing bis-acrylic resin (464.9N) and highest value for 0 degree (596 N), while surface roughness values were lowest for heat polymerized polymethyl methacrylate (0.132μm), and the highest for auto polymerizing polymethyl methacrylate (0.836 μm). Significant differences were obtained between three build directions for fracture load and surface roughness (p=0.001); in all pairwise comparisons except between 0 and 90 degrees (p=0.502) for fracture load; and between all three build directions for surface roughness (p=0.01). On comparing with other provisional materials, significant difference (p=0.001) was observed between all groups. Conclusion- Build direction affected the mechanical properties of additively manufactured three-unit provisionals with 0 degree printed provisionals showing highest fracture load and lowest surface roughness. On comparing with other provisional materials, 0 degree showed highest fracture load, with surface roughness similar to heat polymerized provisionals.

不同构建方向对添加式制造三单元临时修复体的断裂载荷和表面粗糙度的影响以及与传统临时制造方法的比较
目的:比较0度、45度和90度构建方向对加成法制造的三单位固定临时修复体的断裂负荷和表面粗糙度的影响,并与使用传统材料制造的临时修复体进行比较:材料和方法:为缺失的下颌第一磨牙准备下颌正中右第二磨牙和前磨牙,以接受三单位固定局部义齿。使用热聚合聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯、自动聚合树脂和双丙烯酸复合树脂在 0 度、45 度和 90 度额外制造 3 个单位的临时义齿,并对断裂负荷和表面粗糙度进行测试。采用单因素方差分析和 Tukey 检验对数据进行分析:在断裂荷载方面,自动聚合双丙烯酸树脂的平均值最低(464.9N),而 0 度树脂的平均值最高(596N);在表面粗糙度方面,热聚合聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯的表面粗糙度值最低(0.132μm),而自动聚合聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯的表面粗糙度值最高(0.836μm)。在断裂载荷和表面粗糙度方面,三个构建方向之间存在显著差异(p=0.001);在断裂载荷方面,除 0 度和 90 度之间(p=0.502)外,所有成对比较均存在显著差异;在表面粗糙度方面,所有三个构建方向之间均存在显著差异(p=0.01)。在与其他临时材料比较时,所有组别之间均存在显著差异(p=0.001)。结论--堆积方向会影响加成法制造的三单位临时牙的机械性能,0 度印刷临时牙显示出最高的断裂载荷和最低的表面粗糙度。与其他临时材料相比,0 度印刷临时材料的断裂载荷最大,表面粗糙度与热聚合临时材料相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信