Tummy Time Tracking: Examining Agreement Between Parent Recall and Direct Observation in Infants.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Ketaki Inamdar, Stacey C Dusing, Leroy Thacker, Peter E Pidcoe, Sheryl Finucane, Virginia Chu
{"title":"Tummy Time Tracking: Examining Agreement Between Parent Recall and Direct Observation in Infants.","authors":"Ketaki Inamdar, Stacey C Dusing, Leroy Thacker, Peter E Pidcoe, Sheryl Finucane, Virginia Chu","doi":"10.5014/ajot.2024.050521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Parent recall is the primary method for measuring positioning practices such as tummy time in infants. Concerns regarding the accuracy of parent recall have been raised in the literature. To date, no study has examined the agreement of tummy time recall measures with gold-standard methods.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the agreement between parental recall versus direct observation of tummy time in infants, and to explore the impact of prematurity on this relationship.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional observational study, spanning 1 yr.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Participants' homes Participants: Thirty-two infant-parent dyads (19 full-term, 13 preterm), with infants ages 3 to 6 mo and caregivers ages older than 18 yr.</p><p><strong>Outcome and measures: </strong>Home-recorded videos of infant play across 3 days were used as a proxy for direct observation of tummy time and compared with a 12-item parent recall survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Parent recall had a significant moderate correlation (ρ = .54, p = .002) with direct observation in full-term infants but was not correlated (p = .23) with direct observation in preterm infants. On average, parents of preterm infants overestimated tummy time by 2.5 times per day compared with direct observation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>For full-term infants, parent recall measures of tummy time exhibit an acceptable level of agreement with direct observation and can be reliably used over shorter periods. Parents of preterm infants may display a bias in recalling tummy time, leading to overestimations. To accurately assess tummy time in this population, a combination of subjective and objective measures should be explored. Plain-Language Summary: Tummy time is an essential movement experience for infants, especially for preterm infants, who are at a higher risk for motor delays. The most common way to track tummy time is through parent reports, or recall, versus a practitioner directly observing tummy time in the home. Despite the widespread use of parent recall to track tummy time, no study has examined the accuracy of parent recall versus direct observation in the home. Accurately assessing tummy time is crucial for improving and supporting health outcomes for infants. This study found that prematurity may affect the accuracy of parent recall for assessing tummy time in young infants. The authors discuss the implications of this finding and provide suggestions to guide the selection of appropriate methods to measure tummy time in clinical practice and research studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":48317,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11312063/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2024.050521","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Parent recall is the primary method for measuring positioning practices such as tummy time in infants. Concerns regarding the accuracy of parent recall have been raised in the literature. To date, no study has examined the agreement of tummy time recall measures with gold-standard methods.

Objective: To assess the agreement between parental recall versus direct observation of tummy time in infants, and to explore the impact of prematurity on this relationship.

Design: Cross-sectional observational study, spanning 1 yr.

Setting: Participants' homes Participants: Thirty-two infant-parent dyads (19 full-term, 13 preterm), with infants ages 3 to 6 mo and caregivers ages older than 18 yr.

Outcome and measures: Home-recorded videos of infant play across 3 days were used as a proxy for direct observation of tummy time and compared with a 12-item parent recall survey.

Results: Parent recall had a significant moderate correlation (ρ = .54, p = .002) with direct observation in full-term infants but was not correlated (p = .23) with direct observation in preterm infants. On average, parents of preterm infants overestimated tummy time by 2.5 times per day compared with direct observation.

Conclusions and relevance: For full-term infants, parent recall measures of tummy time exhibit an acceptable level of agreement with direct observation and can be reliably used over shorter periods. Parents of preterm infants may display a bias in recalling tummy time, leading to overestimations. To accurately assess tummy time in this population, a combination of subjective and objective measures should be explored. Plain-Language Summary: Tummy time is an essential movement experience for infants, especially for preterm infants, who are at a higher risk for motor delays. The most common way to track tummy time is through parent reports, or recall, versus a practitioner directly observing tummy time in the home. Despite the widespread use of parent recall to track tummy time, no study has examined the accuracy of parent recall versus direct observation in the home. Accurately assessing tummy time is crucial for improving and supporting health outcomes for infants. This study found that prematurity may affect the accuracy of parent recall for assessing tummy time in young infants. The authors discuss the implications of this finding and provide suggestions to guide the selection of appropriate methods to measure tummy time in clinical practice and research studies.

腹部时间追踪:研究父母回忆与直接观察婴儿之间的一致性。
重要性:家长回忆是测量婴儿翻身时间等定位做法的主要方法。有文献对家长回忆的准确性表示担忧。迄今为止,还没有研究考察过仰卧时间回忆测量与黄金标准方法的一致性:评估父母回忆与直接观察婴儿翻身时间之间的一致性,并探讨早产对这种关系的影响:设计:横断面观察研究,时间跨度为 1 年:地点:参与者家中32对婴儿-家长组合(19对足月儿,13对早产儿),婴儿年龄为3至6个月,照顾者年龄为18岁以上:使用家庭录制的 3 天婴儿游戏视频作为直接观察腹部时间的替代物,并与 12 项家长回忆调查进行比较:结果:在足月婴儿中,家长回忆与直接观察有明显的中度相关性(ρ = .54,p = .002),但在早产儿中,家长回忆与直接观察没有相关性(p = .23)。与直接观察相比,早产儿父母平均每天高估了2.5次腹部时间:对于足月婴儿,家长对翻身时间的回忆与直接观察的一致程度可以接受,而且可以在较短时间内可靠地使用。早产儿的父母在回忆宝宝的翻身时间时可能会出现偏差,从而导致高估宝宝的翻身时间。要准确评估早产儿的翻身时间,应将主观和客观测量相结合。通俗易懂的摘要:翻身时间是婴儿必不可少的运动体验,尤其是早产儿,他们运动迟缓的风险更高。最常见的方法是通过家长的报告或回忆,以及从业人员在家中直接观察宝宝的翻身时间来跟踪宝宝的翻身时间。尽管家长回忆法被广泛用于跟踪宝宝的腹部时间,但还没有研究对家长回忆法与在家中直接观察法的准确性进行研究。准确评估坐月子时间对于改善和支持婴儿的健康状况至关重要。本研究发现,早产儿可能会影响家长回忆评估幼儿翻身时间的准确性。作者讨论了这一发现的意义,并提出了一些建议,以指导临床实践和研究选择适当的方法来测量婴儿的翻身时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
406
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT) is an official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. and is published 6 times per year. This peer reviewed journal focuses on research, practice, and health care issues in the field of occupational therapy. AOTA members receive 6 issues of AJOT per year and have online access to archived abstracts and full-text articles. Nonmembers may view abstracts online but must purchase full-text articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信